Feminist History of Philosophy > Bibliography of Feminist Philosophers Writing about the History of Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Supplement to Feminist History of Philosophy

Bibliography of Feminist Philosophers Writing about the History of Philosophy

This bibliography was first constructed by Abigail Gosselin, who maintained it until 2006. In 2015, it was revised and restructured by Rosalind Chaplin and Emily Hodges. In 2021 it was revised and restructured by Alin Varciu.

The bibliography begins with a general section of sources that span historical periods. The sections that follow are organized by historical period, and by philosophical traditions (for the Twentieth Century). Each section begins with a set of general sources for the period. It then lists philosophers from the period in chronological order (by year of birth) with sources proper to those figures. With respect to secondary sources, this bibliography focuses on material written in English.

The 2015 revision includes substantial additions through the Eighteenth Century. Some annotations are provided, especially for general sources. These annotations, however, may not include complete information regarding the figures covered in the volume.

The 2021 revision includes a chronological reordering of the philosophers included in each historical period (by year of birth), and a restructuring of the Twentieth Century section according to the philosophical traditions of the time. While the bibliography was revised overall, substantial additions have been added especially to the sections on Medieval Philosophy, Eighteenth Century Philosophy, Nineteenth Century Philosophy, and Twentieth Century Philosophy.

General
Ancient Philosophy
Medieval Philosophy
Renaissance and Sixteenth Century Philosophy
Seventeenth Century Philosophy
Eighteenth Century Philosophy
Nineteenth Century Philosophy
Twentieth Century Philosophy: General
Twentieth Century Philosophy: Classical Phenomenology
Twentieth Century Philosophy: Early Analytic Philosophy
Twentieth Century Philosophy: Existentialism
Twentieth Century Philosophy: Social and Political Philosophy
Twentieth Century Philosophy: Psychoanalysis
Twentieth Century Philosophy: Other

General

Books

Abensour, Léon, 1921. Histoire générale du féminisme, Paris: Delagrave.
Alanen, Lilli and Charlotte Witt (eds.), 2004. Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy, Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Allen, Ann Taylor, 1991. Feminism and Motherhood in Germany, 1800–1914, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Allen, Prudence, 2006. The Concept of Woman, Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Anderson, Bonnie S., and Judith P. Zinsser, 1999. A History of Their Own: Women in Europe from Prehistory to the Present, Oxford UP.
Antony, Louise and Charlotte Witt (eds.), 1993. A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Boulder: Westview Press.
Atherton, Margaret, 1994. Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period, Hackett Publishing Co. [Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, Margaret Cavendish, Anne Viscountess Conway, Damaris Cudworth (Lady Masham), Mary Astell, Catherine Trotter Cockburn, and Lady Mary Shepherd.]
Bar On, Bat-Ami (ed.), 1994. Modern Engendering: Critical Feminist Readings in Modern Western Philosophy, Albany: SUNY Press.
Becker-Cantarino, Barbara, 1987. Der lange Weg zur Mündigkeit: Frau und Literatur (1500–1800), Stuttgart: Metzler.
Becker-Cantarino, Barbara, 2000. Schriftstellerinnen der Romantik. Epoche–Werk – Wirkung, Hamburg: Beck.
Broad, Jacqueline and Karen Green, 2009. A history of women’s political thought in Europe, 1400–1700, Cambridge University Press. [Explicitly focuses on Pizan, de Beaujeu, de Navarre, Queen Elizabeth of England, de Gournay, Scudery, Cavendish, Astell. Other sections are on groups of women.]
Broad, Jacqueline and Karen Green (eds.), 2007. Virtue, Liberty, and Toleration: Political Ideals of European Women (1400–1800), Netherlands: Springer. [Includes chapters specifically dedicated to Margaret Cavendish, Damaris Cudworth Masham, Mary Astell, Elizabeth Carter, Catherine Macauley, and Mary Wollstonecraft.]
Bürger, Christa, 1990. Leben Schreiben: Die Klassik, die Romantik, und der Ort der Frauen, Stuttgart: Metzler.
Case, Bettye Anne and Anne M. Leggett (eds.), 2005. Complexities: Women in Mathematics, Princeton University Press.
Coole, Diana H., 1988. Women in Political Theory: From Ancient Misogyny to Contemporary Feminism, Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.
Couchman, Jane and Ann Crabb (eds.), 2005. Women’s Letters Across Europe, 1400–1700: Form and Persuasion, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Churchill, L.J., P.R. Brown and J. E. Jeffrey (eds.), 2002. Women Writing Latin: From Roman Antiquity to Early Modern Europe, New York: Routledge. [Also listed under Isotta Nagarola]
Cornell, Drucilla, 1993. Transformations: Recollective Imagination and Sexual Difference, New York: Routledge.
Daley, Margaretmary, 1998. Women of Letters. A Study of Self and Genre in the Personal Writings of Caroline Schlegel-Schelling, Rahel Levin Varnhagen, and Bettina von Arnim, Rochester: Camden House.
Deutscher, Penelope, 1997. Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction, and the History of Philosophy, London and New York: Routledge.
Duran, Jane, 2006. Eight Women Philosophers: Theory, Politics, and Feminism, Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press. [Includes chapters on Hildegard of Bingen, Anne Conway, Mary Astell, Mary Wollstonecraft, plus some later women.]
Dykeman, Therese Boos (ed.), 1999. The Neglected Canon: Nine Women Philosophers from the First to the Twentieth Century, Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Includes discussions of Astell, de la Cruz, de Gourney, van Schurman, and others.]
Dykeman, Therese Boos (ed.), 1993. American Women Philosophers 1650–1930: Six Exemplary Thinkers, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press. [Anne Bradstreet, Mercy Otis Warren, Mary Whiton Calkins, Judith Sargent Murray, Frances Wright, Ednah Dow Cheney.]
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (ed.), 1982. The Family in Political Thought, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Ferguson, Moira, 1993. Colonialism and Gender Relations from Mary Wollstonecraft to Jamaica Kincaid: East Caribbean Connections, New York: Columbia University Press.
Frye, Marilyn, 1992. The Possibility of Feminist Theory, Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.
Fuss, Diana, 1989. Essentially Speaking, New York: Routledge.
Gardner, Catherine Villanueva, 2006. Historical Dictionary of Feminist Philosophy, Metuchen: Scarecrow Press.
Gatens, Moira, 1991. Feminism and Philosophy: Perspectives on Difference and Equality, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gössmann, Elisabeth (ed.), 1984. Archiv für philosophie- und theologiegeschichtliche Frauenforschung, Vol. 1: Das Wohlgelahrte Frauenzimmer, Munich: iudicium Verlag.
Gould, Carol C. and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), 1976. Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Groenhout, Ruth F., 2002. Philosophy, Feminism and Faith. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Grimshaw, Jean, 1986. Feminist Philosophers: Women’s Perspectives on Philosophical Traditions, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Harding, Sandra and Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.), 1983. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Harding, Sandra, 1986. The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Heyes, C. J. (ed.), 2012. Philosophy and Gender (Critical Concepts in Philosophy Series), Routledge. [Has a Section on Ancient and Medieval Philosophy.]
Holland, Nancy J., 1998. The Madwoman’s Reason: The Concept of the Appropriate in Ethical Thought, University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
Hunter, Lynette and Sarah Hutton (eds.), 1997. Women, science and medicine 1500–1700: mothers and sisters of the Royal Society, Sutton Publishing.
Inglis, Laura Lyn and Peter K. Steinfeld, 2000. Old Dead White Men’s Philosophy, Amherst: Humanity Books.
Jones, Gregory L. and Stephen E. Fowl (eds.), 1995. Rethinking Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell.
Kale, S, 2004. French salons: high society and political sociability from the Old Regime to the Revolution of 1848, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kelly, J., 1984. Women, History and Theory: The Essays of Joan Kelly, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kersey, Ethel M., 1989. Women Philosophers: A Bio-Critical Sourcebook. Greenwood Press, in Lilly Library, REF/B/105/.W6/K4.7/1989. [Briefly describes 170 women from before 1920.]
King, M.L. and A. Rabil Jr., 1983. Her Immaculate Hand: Selected Works by and about the Women Humanists of Quattrocento Italy, Binghamton, N.Y.: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies. [Includes many primary texts of Cassandra Fedele and Laura Cereta among others.]
Kittay, Eva Feder and Linda Martín Alcoff (eds.), 2008. The Blackwell guide to feminist philosophy, John Wiley and sons.
Kleinau, Elke and Claudia Opitz (eds.), 1996. Geschichte der Mädchen-und Frauenbildung, 2 vols., Frankfurt: Campus.
Korsmeyer, Carolyn, 2004. Gender and Aesthetics: An Introduction, New York: Routledge.
Kourany, Janet A., 1998. Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [available online] [Includes Astell, de Gourney, de Grouchy, Guyon, Marie Huber, Amalia Holst, Bathsua Makin, Panckoucke, Sister Jacqueline Pascal, Gabrielle Suchon, Fanny Raoul, and others.]
LeDoeuff, Michele, 1991. Hipparchia’s Choice: An Essay Concerning Women, Philosophy, Etc, Trista Selous (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Lloyd, Genevieve, 1993. The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lloyd, Genevieve (ed.), 2002. Feminism and History of Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Mahowald, Mary, 1983. The Philosophy of Woman, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Matthes, Melissa M., 2000. The Rape of Lucretia and the Founding of Republics: Readings in Livy, Machiavelli, and Rousseau, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
McAlister, Linda Lopez (ed.) 1996. Hypatia’s Daughters: Fifteen Hundred Years of Women Philosophers, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Menage, Gilles, 1984. The History of Women Philosophers, Beatrice H. Zedler (trans.), Lanham: University Press of America.
Moscovici, Claudia, 1996. From Sex Objects to Sexual Subjects, New York: Routledge.
Nye, Andrea, 1988. Feminist Theory and the Philosophies of Man, London: Croom Helm.
Nye, Andrea, 1995. Feminism and Modern Philosophy. New York: Prentice Hall International.
Okin, Susan Moller, 1979. Women in Western Political Thought, Princeton: University of Princeton Press.
O’Neill, Eileen and M. Lascano (eds.), 2014. Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, Dordrecht:Springer.
Osen, Lynn, 1974. Women in Mathematics, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [Includes chapters on de Agnesi, Marquise du Chatelet, Caroline Herschel, Sophie Germain, Mary Fairfax Somerville, Sonya Corvin-Krukovsky Kovalevsky, and Amy (Amalie) Noether.]
Pande, Rekha, 2010. Divine Sounds from the Heart-Singing Unfettered in Their Own Voices: The Bhakti Movement and Its Women Saints (12th to 17th Century), Cambridge Scholars Pub.
Panizza, L. and S. Wood., 2000. A History of Women’s Writing in Italy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [From the early Renaissance to 2000.]
Rorty, Richard, J. B. Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner (eds.), 1984. Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rossi, Alice S., 1984. Essays on Sex Equality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Scheman, Naomi, 1993. Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege, New York: Routledge.
Schiebinger, Londa, 1991. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science, Harvard University Press.
Schwartz, Agatha, 2008. Shifting Voices. Feminist Thought and Women’s Writing in Fin-de- Siècle Austria and Hungary, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Soper, Kate, 1995. What is Nature? Culture, Politics, and the Non Human, Oxford: Blackwell.
Spalding-Andréolle, Donna and Véronique Molinari (eds.), 2011. Women and Science, 17th Century to Present: Pioneers, Activists and Protagonists, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Spelman, Elizabeth, 1988. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought, Boston: Beacon Press.
Tong, Rosemarie, 1995. Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction, London: Routledge.
Tuana, Nancy, 1993. The Less Noble Sex: Scientific, Religious, and Philosophical Conceptions of Woman’s Nature, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Tuana, Nancy, 1992. Woman and the History of Philosophy, New York: Paragon House.
Tuana, Nancy (ed.), 1994–. Re-Reading the Canon Series, Pennsylvania State University Press.
Waithe, Mary Ellen (ed.), 1987–1991. A History of Women Philosophers, Vol. 1–3, Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Warnock, Mary (ed.), 1996. Women Philosophers, London: J. M. Dent.
Warren, Mary Anne, 1980. The Nature of Woman: An Encyclopaedia and Guide to the Literature, Reyes, CA: Edgepress.
Warren, Karen (ed.), 2009. An unconventional history of Western philosophy: conversations between men and women philosophers, Rowman & Littlefield. [Includes primary sources for Hildegard of Bingen, as well as Princess Elisabeth, Macualay, Masham, Conway, Wollstonecraft, van Schurman.]
Watanabe-O’Kelly, Helen, 2010. Beauty or Beast? The Woman Warrior in the German Imagination from the Renaissance to the Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woloch, Nancy, 1994. Women and the American Experience, 2^nd ed., NY: McGraw.
Zinsser, Judith P (ed.), 2005. Men, Women, and the Birthing of Modern Science, DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

Articles

Atherton, Margaret, n.d. “Doing the History of Philosophy as a Feminist,” American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, L. Antony and D. Meyers (eds.).
Bell, Linda A., 1984. “Gallantry: What it is and Why it Should Not Survive,” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 22: 165–174.
Bock, Gisele and Margarete Zimmerman, 1997. “Die Querelle des Femmes in Europa. Eine begriffs- und forschungsgeschichtliche Einführung,” Querelles. Jahrbuch für Frauenforschung, 2: 9–38.
Code, Lorraine, 1986. “Simple Equality is Not Enough,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Supp., 64.
Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina, 2020. “From a ‘memorable place’ to ‘drops in the ocean’: on the marginalization of women philosophers in German historiography of philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28(3): 442–462.
Finucci, V., 2005. “In the Footsteps of Petrarch,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 35(3): 457–466. [Discusses Isotta Nogarola as well as Renaissance women such as Laura Cereta.]
Gössmann, Elisabeth, 1985. “Die Rezeption von Frauengelehrsamkeit aus Antike, Mittelalter und Renaissance im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert,” in Archiv für philosophie- und theologiegeschichtliche Frauenforschung, Vol. 2: Eva Gottes Meisterwerk, Elisabeth Gössmann (ed.), Munich: iudicium Verlag, 7–21.
Hebard, Barbara A., 2009. “The Role of Women at the Boston Athenaeum,” The Boston Athenaeum Bicentennial Essays, Richard Wendorf (ed.), Hanover/London: University Press of New England, 69–97.
Kelly, Joan, 1988. “Early Feminist Theory and the Querelle des Femmes: 1400–1789,” in Women, History, Theory: The Essays of Joan Kelly, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 65–109.
Jose, Jim, 2004. “No More Like Pallas Athena: Displacing Patrilineal Accounts of Modern Feminist Political Theory,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(4): 1–22.
Lloyd, Genevieve, 1979. “The Man of Reason,” Metaphilosophy, 10(1): 18–37.
Lloyd, Genevieve, 1993. “Maleness, Metaphor, and the ‘Crisis’ of Reason,” in A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Antony and Witt (eds.), Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 69–84.
Monter, E. William, 1980. “Women in Calvinist Geneva (1550–1800),” Signs, 6(2): 189–209. [available online].
Olkowski, Dorothea, 1997. “Materiality and Language: Butler’s Interrogation of the History of Philosophy,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 23(3): 37–53.
Parsons, Susan Frank, 2004. “To Be or Not To Be: Gender and Ontology,” Heythrop Journal: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, 45(3): 327–343.
Potter, Elizabeth, 1988. “Modeling the Gender Politics in Science,” Hypatia, 3: 19–33.
Rang, Brita, 1998. “A ‘learned wave’: Women of Letters and Science from Renaissance to the Enlightenment,” Perspectives on Feminist Political Thought in European History. From the Middle Ages to the Present, Tjitske Akkerman and Siep Stuurman (eds.), London: Routledge, 50–66.
Rooney, Phyllis, 1991. “Gendered Reason: Sex, Metaphor and Conceptions of Reason,” Hypatia, 6(2): 77–103.
Rooney, Phyllis, 1994. “Recent Work in Feminist Discussions of Reason,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(1): 1–21.
Schwartz, Agatha, 2005. “Austrian Fin-de-Siècle Gender Heteroglossia: The Dialogism of Misogyny, Feminism, and Viriphobia,” German Studies Review, 28(2): 347–366.
Schwartz, Agatha, 2007. “The Crisis of the Female Self in Fin de Siècle Austrian Women Writers’ Narratives,” Modern Austrian Literature, 40(3): 1–19.
Scheman, Naomi, 1993. “Though This Be Method, Yet There Is Madness in It: Paranoia and Liberal Epistemology,” in A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Antony and Witt (eds.), Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 177–207.
Shapiro, Lisa, 2016. “Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2(3): 365–383.
Tuana, Nancy, 1988. “The Weaker Seed: The Sexist Bias of Reproductive Theory,” Hypatia, 3: 35–59.
Witt, Charlotte, 1993. “Feminist Metaphysics,” in A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Antony and Witt (eds.), Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 273–288.
Witt, Charlotte, 2006. “Feminist Interpretations of the Philosophical Canon,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(2): 537–552.
Wolff, Robert Paul, 1976. “There’s Nobody Here But Us Persons,” Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

Ancient Philosophy

General Ancient

Books

Allen, P., 1997. The concept of woman: The Aristotelian Revolution, 750 BC-AD 1250, Vol. 1, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. [Discusses the concept of women in the writings of philosophers of the time.]
Archer, L. S. Fischler and M. Wyke (eds.), 1994. Women in Ancient Societies, London: Routledge.
Bar-On, Bat Ami (ed.), 1994. Engendering Origins: Critical Feminist Readings in Plato and Aristotle, Albany: SUNY Press.
DuBois, Page, 1998. Sowing the Body: Psychoanalysis and Ancient Representations of Women, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mahowald, Mary Briody (ed.), 1983. Philosophy of Woman: An Anthology of Classic and Current Concepts, Second Edition, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Nussbaum, Martha, 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peradotto, J. and J. P. Sullivan (eds.), 1984. Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers, Albany: SUNY Press.
Pomeroy, Sarah, 1975. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity, New York: Schocken Books.
Pomeroy, Sarah, 1984. Women in Hellenistic Egypt: From Alexander to Cleopatra, New York: Schocken Books.
Rabinowitz, Nancy, 1993. Anxiety Veiled: Euripides and the Traffic in Women, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Rabinowitz, Nancy, 1993. Feminist Theory and the Classics, New York and London: Routledge.
Snyder, Jane, 1988. The Women and the Lyre: Women Writers in Classical Greece and Rome, Carbondale: South Illinois University Press.
Ward, Julie K., 1996. Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, New York and London: Routledge.
Wright, F. A., 1969. Feminism in Greek Literature: From Homer to Aristotle, Port Washington: Kennikat Press.

Articles

Arthur, Marilyn, 1984. “Early Greece: The Origin of the Western Attitude Toward Women,” Women and the Ancient World: The Arethusa Paper, J. Perradotto and J. P. Sullivan (eds.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Asmis, Elizabeth, 1996. “The Stoics on Women,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Brumbaugh, Robert and John Burnham, 1989. “Coins and Classical Philosophy,” Teaching Philosophy, 12: 243–255.
Connell, Sophia M., 2000. “Aristotle and Galen on Sex Difference and Reproduction: A New Approach to an Ancient Rivalry,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31A(3): 405–427.
Freeland, Cynthia, 2000. “Feminism and Ideology in Ancient Philosophy,” Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 33(4): 365–406.
Gottner Abendroth, Heide, 1991. The Dancing Goddess: Principles of a Matriarchal Aesthetic, Maureen T. Krause (trans.), Boston: Beacon Press.
Hawkesworth, Mary E., 1987. “Re/Vision: Feminist Theory Confronts the Polis,” Social Theory and Practice, 13: 155–186.
Katz, Marilyn, 1992. “Ideology and ‘The Status of Women’ in Ancient Greece,” History and Theory, 31(4): 70–97.
Kotzin, Rhoda Hadassah, 1998. “Ancient Greek Philosophy,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Molinaro, Ursule, 1989. “A Christian Martyr in Reverse Hypatia: 370–415 A.D.,” Hypatia, 4: 6–8.
Nussbaum, Martha, 1996. “Therapeutic Arguments and Structures of Desire,” Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Perez-Estevez, Antonio, 1986. “Feminidad Y Racionalidad En El Pensamiento Griego,” Rev. Filosof (Venezuela), 9: 167–199.
Skinner, Marilyn (ed.), 1987. “Rescuing Creusa: New Methodological Approaches to Women in Antiquity,” Special Issue of Helios, 13(2).
Smith, Nicholas, 1983. “Plato and Aristotle on the Nature of Women,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 21: 467–478.
Spelman, Elizabeth, 1984. “Anger and Insubordination,” in Beyond Domination: New Perspectives on Women and Philosophy, Carol Gould (ed.), Totowa NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
Spelman, Elizabeth V., 1982. “Woman as Body: Ancient and Contemporary View,” Feminist Studies, 8: 109–131.
Thompson, Patricia J., 1996. “Re-Claiming Hestia: Goddess of Everyday Life,” Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 3(4): 20–28.
Thompson, Patricia J., 2000. “Hestian Thinking in Antiquity and Modernity: Pythagorean Women Philosophers and 19^th Century Domestic Scientists,” Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 7(2–3): 71–82.
Wartenberg, Thomas E., 1988. “Teaching Women Philosophy,” Teaching Philosophy, 11: 15–24.
Whitbeck, Caroline, 1976. “Theories of Sex Difference,” Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Wider, Kathleen, 1986. “Women Philosophers in the Ancient World: Donning the Mantle,” Hypatia, 1: 21–62.
Wiseman, Mary Bittner, 1993. “Beautiful Exiles in Aesthetics,” Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective, Hilde Hein (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 169–178.

Diotima of Mantinea (ca. 440 BCE)

Plato, 1971. Symposium, Jowett, B. (transl.), in The dialogues of Plato, Hutchins, R. M. (ed.) (Great books of the western world, vol. 7), Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 149–173.
Waithe, Mary Ellen 1987. “Diotima of Mantinea,” in Waithe, Mary Ellen (ed.): A history of women philosophers. 600 BC–500 AD, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 83–116.
Wawrytko, Sandra A., 2018. “Women on love — Idealization in the philosophies of Diotima (Symposium) and Murasaki Shikibu (The Tale of Genji),” Philosophy East and West, 69 (1): 1314–1344.

Plato (429?–347 BCE)

Books

Bluestone, Natalie Harris, 1987. Women and the Ideal Society: Plato’s Republic and Modern Myths of Gender, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Buchan, Morag, 1999. Women in Plato’s Political Theory, New York: Routledge.
Tuana, Nancy (ed.), 1994. Feminist Interpretations of Plato, University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.

Articles

Allen, Christine Garside, 1975. “Plato on Women,” Feminist Studies, 2(2–3): 132.
Annas, Julia, 1996. “Plato’s Republic and Feminism,” Philosophy, 51: 309. Reprinted in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), 1996, New York and London: Routledge.
Bowery, Anne-Marie, 1996. “Diotima Tells a Story: A Narrative Analysis of Plato’s ‘Symposium,’” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Bowery, Anne-Marie, 1995. “Plato Visits Postmodernity,” Southwest Philosophy Review, 11: 135–142.
Brown, Wendy, 1988. “‘Supposing Truth Were a Woman’: Plato’s Subversion of Masculine Discourse,” Political Theory, 16: 594–616.
Calvert, Brian, 1975. “Plato and the Equality of Women,” Phoenix, 29(3).
Cappelletti, Angel J., 1980.“Sobre El Feminismo De Platon,” Revista de Filosofio (Venezuela), 12: 87–96.
Darling, John, 1986. “Are Women Good Enough: Plato’s Feminism Re-Examined,” Journal of Philosophy in Education, 20: 123–128.
De Pater, W. and W. Van Langendonck, 1989. “Natuurlijkheid Van De Taal En Iconiciteit: Plato En Hedendaagse Taaltheorieen,” Tijdschr Filosof, 51: 256–297.
Dickason, Anne, 1976. “Anatomy and Destiny: The Role of Biology in Plato’s Views of Women,” The Philosophical Forum, V (Fall-Winter 1973–1974). Reprinted in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), 1976. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Fortenbaugh, W. W., 1975. “On Plato’s Feminism in ‘Republic V,’,” Apeiron, IX(2).
Freeman, Barbara, 1988. “(Re)writing Patriarchal Texts: The Symposium,” in Postmodernism and Continental Philosophy, Hugh J. Silverman and Donn Welton (eds.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Gardner, Catherine, 2000. “The Remnants of the Family: The Role of Women and Eugenics in Republic V” in History of Philosophy Quarterly, 17(3): 217–235.
Genova, Judith, 1994. “Feminist Dialectics: Plato and Dualism,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Gould, Timothy, 1982. “Intensity and its Audiences: Notes Towards a Feminist Perspective,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12: 287–302.
Hampton, Cynthia, 1994. “Overcoming Dualism: The Importance of the Intermediate in Plato’s Philebus,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Hawthorne, Susan, 1994. “Diotima Speaks Through the Body,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On, (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press, 1994.
Irigaray, Luce, 1995. “Sorcerer’s Love: A Reading of Plato’s ‘Symposium,’” Eleanor H. Kuykendall (trans.), in Feminism and Philosophy: Essential Readings in Theory, Reinterpretation, and Application, Boulder: Westview Press.
Jacobs, William, 1978. “Plato on Female Emancipation and the Traditional Family,” Apeiron, 12: 24–31.
Joo, Maria, 1996. “The Platonic ‘Eros’ and Its Feminist Interpretations,” Magyar Filozofiai Szemle, 1–2–3: 1–30 (Hungarian).
Kofman, Sarah, 2002. “Socrates and his Twins (The Socrates(es) of Plato’s Symposium)” in Feminism and History of Philosophy, Genevieve Lloyd (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 41–67.
Lange, Lynda, 1979. “The Function of Equal Education in Plato’s ‘Republic’ and ‘Laws,’” in The Sexism of Social and Political Theory, L. Clark and L. Lange (eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lesser, Harry, 1979. “Plato’s Feminism,” Philosophy, 54: 113–117.
Levin, Susan B., 1996. “Women’s Nature and Role in the Ideal Polis: ‘Republic V’ Revisited,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Levin, Susan B., 2000. “Plato’s On Women’s Nature: Reflections on the Laws” in Ancient Philosophy, 20(1): 81–97.
Lovibond, Sabina, 1994. “An Ancient Theory of Gender: Plato and the Pythagorean Table,” in Women in Ancient Societies, Archer, Fischler, and Wyke (eds.), London: Routledge), 88–101.
Mansfeld, Jaap, 1987. “Plato Over De Vrouw,” Alg. Ned. Tijdschr Wijs, 79: 199–120,.
Marquez, Alvaro, 1986. “El Tema De Lo Femenino En Platon,” Revista de Filosofio (Venezuela), 9: 33–41.
Martin, Jane R, 1977. “Equality and Education in Plato,” in Feminism and Philosophy, M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. A. Elliston, J. English (eds.), Totowa, NJ: Littlefield.
Nye, Andrea, 1989. “The Hidden Host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato’s Symposium,” Hypatia, 3: 45–61.
Okin, Susan Moller, 1977. “Philosopher Queens and Private Wives: Plato on Women and the Family,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(Summer).
Osborne, Martha Lee, 1975. “Plato’s Unchanging View of Woman: A Denial That Anatomy Spells Destiny,” The Philosophical Forum, Summer.
Pierce, Christine, 1973. “Equality: ‘Republic V,’” The Monist, 57(January).
Pierce, Christine, 1994. “Eros and Epistemology,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Pomeroy, Sarah, 1974. “Feminism in Book V of Plato’s ‘Republic,’” Apeiron, VIII(1).
Santas, Gerasimos, 2005. “Justice, Law, and Women in Plato’s Republic” in Philosophical Inquiry: International Quarterly, 27(1–2): 25–37.
Saxenhouse, Arlene W., 1984. “Eros and the Female in Greek Political Thought: An Interpretation of Plato’s ‘Symposium,’” Political Theory, 12: 5–27.
Saxenhouse, Arlene W., 1976. “The Philosopher and the Female in the Political Thought of Plato,” Political Theory, 4(May): 195–212.
Senter, Nell W., 1977. “Plato on Women,” Southwest Philosophical Studies, 2: 4–13.
Smith, Janet Farrell, 1983. “Plato, Irony and Equality,” Hypatia, WSIF 1: 597–607.
Smith, Nicholas, 1980. “The Logic of Plato’s Feminism,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 11: 5–11.
Tress, Daryl McGowan, 1994. “Relations in Plato’s ‘Timaeus,’” Journal of Neoplatonic Studies, 3: 93–139.
Tuana, Nancy and William Cowling, 1994. “The Presence and Absence of the Feminine in Plato’s Philosophy” in Feminist Interpretations of Plato, Nancy Tuana (ed)., University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 243–269.
Vlastos, Gregory, 1989. “Was Plato a Feminist?” Times Literary Supplement, 276: 288–289. Cited from Studies in Greek Philosophy, ed. Daniel W. Graham, 1995. Volume 2: Socrates, Plato, and Their Tradition, Princeton: Princeton University Press), 133–143.
Wender, Dorothea, 1973. “Plato: Misogynist, Paedophile and Feminist,” Arethusa, VI (Spring).

Aesara of Lucania (ca. 400–300 BCE)

Stobeaus, 1987. Eclogae Physicae Dialecticae et Ethicae, Harper, Vicki Lynn (transl.), in A History of Women Philosophers (Volume 1), Mary Ellen Waithe (ed.), Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Waithe, Mary Ellen (ed.), 1987. A History of Women Philosophers, vol. 1, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Haskins, Ekaterina, 2005. “Pythagorean Women,” Classical Rhetorics and Rhetoricians, 315–19.
Lefkowitz, M., 1996. “Separate but Equal?” Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, 4 (2): 172–184.
Thesleff, Holger, 1965. Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period (part of Acta Academiae Aboensis, Humanoira. Series A, Vol. 30, 1).

Aristotle (384–322 BCE)

Books

Bickford, Susan, 1996. The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, and Citizenship, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Fortenbaugh, W. W., 1975. Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology, Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics, New York: Harper & Row.
Freeland, Cynthia, 1998. Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
Holland, Nancy, 1998. The Madwoman’s Dream: The Concept of the Appropriate in Ethical Thought, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Tessman, Lisa, 2005. Burdened Virtues: Virtue Ethics for Liberatory Struggles (Studies in Feminist Philosophy), New York: Oxford University Press.

Articles

Achtenberg, Deborah, 1996. “Aristotelian Resources for Feminist Thinking,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Achtenberg, Deborah, 1989. “The Role of the Ergon Argument in Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics,” Ancient Philosophy, 9(1).
Allen, Christine Garside, 1971. “Can a Woman be Good in the Same Way as a Man?” Dialogue, 10: 534–544.
Berman, Ruth, 1989. “From Aristotle’s Dualism to Materialist Dialectics: Feminist Transformation of Science and Society,” in Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing, Alison M. Jaggar and Susan R. Bordo (eds.), New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Cavarero, Adriana, 1992. “Equality and Sexual Difference,” in Beyond Equality and Difference, Gisela Bock (ed.), New York: Routledge.
Cole, Eve Browning, 1994. “ ‘Women, Slaves, and Love of Toil’ in Aristotle’s Moral Philosophy,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Cook, Kathleen C., 1996. “Sexual Inequality in Aristotle’s Theories of Reproduction and Inheritance,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.),New York and London: Routledge.
Curd, Patricia, 1996. “Aristotelian Visions of Moral Character in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Deslauriers, Marguerite, 2009. “Sexual Difference in Aristotle’s Politics and His Biology,” Classical World, 102(3): 215–231.
Fememias, Maria Luisa, 1994. “Women and Natural Hierarchy in Aristotle,” Hypatia, 9(1): 164–172.
Fortenbaugh, W. W., 1977. “Aristotle on Slaves and Women,” in Articles on Aristotle: 2, Ethics and Politics, J. Barnes, J. Schofield, and R. Sorabji (eds.), London: Duckworth.
Freeland, Cynthia A., 1994. “Nourishing Speculation: A Feminist Reading of Aristotelian Science,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Freeland, Cynthia A., 1988. “On Irigaray on Aristotle,” in Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, Cynthia A. Freeland (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania University Press, 1998.
Green, Judith, 1992. “Aristotle on Necessary Verticality, Body Heat, and Gendered Proper Places in the Polis: A Feminist Critique,” Hypatia, 7(1): 70–96.
Halwani, Raja, 2003. “Care Ethics and Virtue Ethics,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 18(3): 160–192.
Hein, Hilde, 1989. “Liberating Philosophy: An End to the Dichotomy of Spirit and Matter,” in Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, Ann Garry and Marilyn Pearsall (eds.), Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Henry, Devin M., 2007. “How Sexist is Aristotle’s Developmental Biology?,” Phronesis, 52: 251–269.
Hirschman, Linda Redlick, 1998. “The Book of ‘A,’” in Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, Cynthia A. Freeland (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
Nielsen, Karen, 2008. “The Private Parts of Animals: Aristotle on the Teleology of Sexual Difference,” Phronesis, 53: 373–405.
Homiak, Marcia, 1996. “Feminism and Aristotle’s Rational Ideal,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Horowitz, Maryanne Cline, 1976. “Aristotle and Women,” Journal of the History of Biology, 9: 183–213.
Krebs, Angelika, 2000. “Freundschaft und Liebe bei Aristoteles und Hugh LaFollette,” Dialektik: Zeitschrift fuer kulturphilosophie, 1: 149–166.
Lange, Lynda, 1983. “Woman is Not a Rational Animal: On Aristotle’s Biology of Reproduction,” in Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel.
Matthews, Gareth B., 1986. “Gender and Essence in Aristotle,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Supp., 64: 16–25.
Merleau, Chloe Taylor, 2003. “Bodies, Genders, and Causation in Aristotle’s Biological and Political Theory,” Ancient Philosophy, 23(1): 125–151.
Modrak, Deborah, 1994. “Aristotle: Women, Deliberation, and Nature,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Morsink, Johannes, 1979. “Was Aristotle’s Biology Sexist?” Journal of the History of Biology, 12(1): 83–112.
Mulgan, Richard, 1994. “Aristotle and the Political Role of Women,” History of Political Thought, 15(2): 179–202.
Reutsche, Laura, 2004. “Virtue and Contingent History: Possibilities for Feminist Epistemology” in Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(1): 73–101.
Rosenberg, Rosalind, 1975. “In Search of Woman’s Nature, 1850–1920,” Feminist Studies, 3: 141–154.
Sakezles, Priscilla K., 1999. “Feminism and Aristotle,” Apeiron, 32(1): 67–74.
Schollmeier, Paul, 2003. “Aristotle and Women: Household and Political Roles,” Polis: The Journal of the Society for the Study of Greek Political Thought, 20(1–2): 22–42.
Senack, Christine M., 1994. “Aristotle on the Woman’s Soul,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Spelman, Elizabeth V., 1983. “Aristotle and the Politicization of the Soul,” in Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.), Dordrecht: Reide.
Stiehm, Judith Hicks, 1983. “The Unit of Political Analysis: Our Aristotelian Hangover,” in Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel.
Thom, P., 1976. “Stiff Cheese For Women,” Philosophical Forum, 8(1): 94–107.
Tress, Daryl McGowan, 1992. “The Metaphysical Science of Aristotle’s ‘Generation of Animals,’ and It Feminist Critics,” Review of Metaphysics, 46(2): 307–341. Reprinted in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), 1996, New York and London: Routledge.
Tuana, Nancy, 1994. “Aristotle and the Politics of Reproduction,” in Engendering Origins, Bat-Ami Bar On (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Tumulty, Peter, 1981. “Aristotle, Feminism, and Natural Law Theory,” New Scholars, 55: 450–464.
Ward, Julia K., 1996. “Aristotle on Philia: The Beginning of a Feminist Ideal of Friendship,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Julie K. Ward (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
Whitbeck, Caroline, 1976. “Theories of Sex Difference,” in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Zack, Naomi, 2001. “Intra-Feminist Criticism and Intellectual Virtue,” in Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy (American Philosophical Association Newsletters), 00(2): 83–84.

Ban Zhao (5–116? CE)

Chiang, Ch’ung-yue, 1992. Ju lin no sheng Pan Chao. Liao-Ling: Min-Zu.
Dykeman, Therese Boos, 1999. The Neglected Canon: Nine Women Philosopher, First to the Twentieth Century, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.
Idema, Wilt and Beata Grant, 2004. “Needle and Thread,” in The Red Brush: Writing Women of Imperial China, Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Legge, James, 1861–1872. Chinese Classics: With a Translation, Critique, and Exegetical Notes, Prolegomena, and Copius Indexes, 5 vols, London: Trubner.
Swann, N.E., 1932. Pan Chao: Foremost Woman Scholar of China. New York: Century.

Medieval Philosophy

General Medieval

Books

Allen, P., 2002–2005. The Concept of Woman: The Early Humanist Reformation, 1250–1500, parts 1–2 (Vols. 2–3), William B. Eerdmans Publishing. [Discusses the concept of women in the writings of philosophers of the time]
Bennett, J. M. and Karras, R. M. (eds.), 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Women and Gender in Medieval Europe, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Benson, P. J. and Kirkham, V. (eds.), 2005. Strong voices, weak history: early women writers & canons in England, France, & Italy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Includes Isotta Nogarola and Christine de Pizan, among others.]
Borresen, Kari Elisabeth (ed.), 1991. Images of God and Gender Models: in Judaeo-Christian Tradition, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
Brabant, Margaret (ed.), 1992. Politics, Gender, and Genre: The Political Thought of Christine de Pizan, Boulder: Westview Press.
Burns, J.H., (ed.), 1988 The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought C. 350-c.1450, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bynum, Caroline Walker, 1984. Jesus as Mother: Studies in the Spirituality of the High Middle Ages, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bynum, Caroline Walker, 1988. Holy Feast and Holy Fast: The Religious Significance of Food to Medieval Women, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bynum, Caroline Walker, 1991. Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion, New York: Zone Books.
Bynum, C. W., 2013. Resurrection of the Body, New York: Columbia University Press. [Includes extensive sections on Herrad of Hohenbourg and Hildegard von Bingen]
Dinshaw, C. and Wallace, D. (eds.), 2003. The Cambridge companion to medieval women’s writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Includes Christine de Pizan and Julian of Norwich, among others.]
Flora, Holly, 2009. The Devout Belief of the Imagination. The Paris Meditationes Vitae Christi and Female Franciscan Spirituality in Trecento Italy. Disciplina Monastica, Vol. 6, Turnhout: Brepols, 2009.
Furlong, Monica, 2013. Visions & Longings, Medieval Women Mystics, Boston: Shambhala Publications.
Gracia, J. J. & Noone, T. B. (eds.), 2008. A companion to philosophy in the Middle Ages, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. [Includes Hildegard of Bingen, among others]
Griffiths, F. J., 2011. The garden of delights: reform and renaissance for women in the twelfth century, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Includes Hildegard von Bingen]
Grundmann, Herbert, 1995. Religiöse Bewegungen im Mittelalter: Untersuchungen über die geschichtlichen Zusammenhänge zwischen der Ketzerei, Den Bettelorden und der religiösen Frauenbegegung im 12. Und 13 Jahrhundrent (1935), translated and republished as Religious Movements in the Middle Ages: The Historical Links between Heresy, the Mendicant Orders, and the Women’s Religious Movement in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Century, with the Historical Foundations of German Mysticism, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hollywood, Amy, 2002. Sensible Ecstasy: Mysticism, Sexual Difference, and the Demands of History, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jantzen, Grace, 1995. Power, Gender, and Christian Mysticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, Gertrud Jaron, 1996. By Women, for Women, about Women: the Sister-Books of Fourteenth-Century Germany, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
McGinn, Bernard (ed.), 1994. Meister Eckhart and the Beguine Mystics: Hadewijch of Brabant, Mechtild of Magdeburg, and Marguerite Porete, New York: Continuum.
McGinn, Bernard, 1998. The Flowering of Mysticism: Men and Women in the New Mysticism – 1200–1350. Vol. III of The Presence of God: A History of Western Christian Mysticism, New York: Crossroad Publishing Co.
Minnis, A. J. and Voaden, R. (eds.), 2010. Medieval Holy Women in the Christian Tradition, C. 1100-c. 1500, Belgium: Brepols Publishing.
Newman, Barbara, 1995. From Virile Woman to Woman Christ: Studies in Medieval Religion and Literature, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Newman, Barbara, 2003. God and the Goddesses: Vision, Poetry, and Belief in the Middle Ages, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Niebrzydowski, S. (ed.), 2011. Middle-aged Women in the Middle Ages (Vol. 7 in the Gender in the Middle Ages Series), Cambridge: DS Brewer.
Suydam, Mary A. and Joanne E. Zeigler, 1999. Performance and Transformation: New Approaches to Late Medieval Spirituality, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Ward, Jennifer, 2016. Women in Medieval Europe 1200–1500, 2^nd edn., London: Routledge.
Winston-Allen, Anne, 2004. Convent Chronicles: Women Writing about Women and Reform in the Late Middle Ages, University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Articles

Bornstein, Daniel, 1996. “Women and Religion in Late Medieval Italy: History and Historiography” Women and Religion in Medieval and Renaissance Italy, D. Bornstein and R. Rusconi (eds.), Margery Schneider (transl.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–27.
Frugoni, Chiara, 1996. “Female Mystics, Visions, and Iconography,” Women and Religion on Medieval and Renaissance Italy, D. Bornstein and R. Rusconi (eds.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 130–164.
Grundmann, Herbert, 1936. “Die Frauen und die Literatur im Mittelalter: Ein Beitrag zur Frage nach der Entstehung des Schrifttums in der Volkssprache,” Archiv fur Kulturgeschichte (26): 129–61.
King, M. L., 2005. “Petrarch, the self-conscious self, and the first women humanists,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 35(3): 537–558.
McLaughlin, Eleanor, 1974. “Equality of Souls, Inequality of Sexes: Women in Medieval Theology,” Religion and Sexism, Rosemary Ruether (ed.), New York: Simon & Schuster.
Megan McLaughlin, 1990. “The woman warrior: gender, warfare and society in medieval Europe,” Women’s Studies, 17: 193–209.
McNamara, Jo Ann, 1994. “The Herrenfrage: The Restructuring of the Gender System, 1050–1150,” Medieval Masculinities: Regarding Men in the Middle Ages, Clare A. Lees (ed.), University of Minnesota Press.
McNamara, Jo Ann, and Suzanne Wemple, 1973. “The Power of Women Through the Family in Medieval Europe, 500–1100,” Feminist Studies, 1: 126–141
Newman, Barbara, 2016. “Annihilation and Authorship: Three Women Mystics of the 1290s,” Speculum 91 (3): 591–630. [includes sections on Mechthild of Hackeborn, Angela of Foligno, and Marguerite Porete]
Petroff, Elizabeth Alvilda, 1994. Body and Soul: Essays on Medieval Women and Mysticism, New York: Oxford UP.
Ruether, Rosemary, 1974. “Misogynism and Virginal Feminism in the Fathers of the Church,” in Religion and Sexism, Rosemary Ruether (ed.), New York: Simon & Schuster.
Scott, Karen, 1982. “’This is why I have put you among your neighbors’: St. Bernard’s and St. Catherine’s Understanding of the Love of God and Neighbor,” in Atti del Simposio Internazionale Cateriniano-Bernardiniano, D. Maffei and P. Nardi (eds.), Siena: Accademia Senese degli Intronati, 279–294.
Van Dyke, Christina, forthcoming. “From Meditation to Contemplation: Broadening the Borders of Philosophy in the 13^th-15^th Centuries,” in Pluralizing Philosophy’s Past – New Reflections in the History of Philosophy, A. Griffioen and M. Backmann (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Dyke, Christina, 2020. “Taking the ‘Dis’ out of ‘Disability’: Martyrs, Mothers, and Mystics in the Middle Ages” in Disability in Medieval Christian Philosophy and Theology, S. Williams (ed.), New York: Routledge, 203–232.

Murasaki Shikibu (973?–1020?)

Books

Goff, Janet, 1991. Noh drama and the Tale of Genji. The art of allusion in fifteen classical plays, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kato, Shuichi, 1979. A History of Japanese Literature: The First Thousand Years, David Chibbett (trans.), London: The Macmillan Press.
Kawabata, Yasunari, 1969. Japan the beautiful and myself, Tokyo: Kodansaha International.
Shikibu, Murasaki, 2002. The Tale of Genji, Royall Tyler (transl.), Penguin Classics.
Shikibu, Murasaki, 1996. The Diary of Lady Murasaki, R. Bowring (transl.), Penguin Classics.
Shikibu, Murasaki, 1982. Murasaki Shikibu, Her Diary and Poetic Memoirs: A Translation and Study, R. Bowring (transl.), New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Articles

Fujiwara No Teika and Meigetsuki, Nanba Hiroshi (ed.), 1972. “Murasaki Shikibu shu no Kenkyu: Koihen, denpon kenkyuhen,” Kasama Sosho, 31.
Miner, Earl, 1982. “The Heroine: Identity, Recurrence, Destiny,” in Ukifune: Love in The Tale of Genji, Andrew Pekarik (ed.), New York: Columbia University Press.
Miyamoto, Shoson, 1967. “Relation of Philosophical Theory to Practical Affairs in Japan,” in The Japanese Mind, Essentials of Japanese Philosophy and Culture, Charles A. Moore (ed.), Honolulu: East-West Center Press, University of Hawai‘i Press, 5–6.
Wawrytko, Sandra A., 2018. “Women on love — Idealization in the philosophies of Diotima (Symposium) and Murasaki Shikibu (The Tale of Genji),” Philosophy East and West, 69(1): 1314–1344.

Hildegard of Bingen (1098–1179)

Books

Hildegard of Bingen, 1882. Analecta Sanctae Hildegardis, J.B Pitra (ed.), Monte Cassino.
Hildegard of Bingen, 1991, 1993. Epistolarium, Lieven Van Acker (ed.), CCCM 91-91a. Turnhout.
Hildegard of Bingen, 1993. Vita Sanctae Hildegardis, M. Klaes (ed.), Turnhout: Brepols.
Hildegard of Bingen, 1996. Liber divinorum operum, Albert Derolez and Peter Dronke (eds.), CCCM 92. Turnhout: Brepols.
Hildegard of Bingen, 2005. Hildegard von Bingen: Selected Writings, Mark Atherton (transl.), Penguin Classics.
Flanagan, S., 2002. Hildegard of Bingen: A visionary life, London: Routledge.
Newman, B., 1989. Sister of Wisdom: St. Hildegard’s Theology of the Feminine, With a New Preface, Bibliography, and Discography, Oakland: University of California Press.
Newman, Barbara (ed.), 1998. Voice of the Living Light: Hildegard of Bingen and Her World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Silvas, Anna, 1998. Jutta and Hildegard: The Biographical Sources, Turnhout: Brepols.

Articles

Corrigan, V. J., 2012. “Hildegard of Bingen,” Icons of the Middle Ages: Rulers, Writers, Rebels, and Saints, Vol 1, Greenword Publishing: 355.
John, Helen J., 1992. “Hildegard of Bingen: A New Medieval Philosopher?” Hypatia, 7(1): 115–123.
Lerius, Julia, 2018. “Hildegard von Bingen on Autonomy” in Women Philosophers on Autonomy: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, S. Berges and A. Sinai (eds.), New York: Routledge, 9–23.
Milem, B., 2002. “Hildegard of Bingen,” A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, Jorge JE Gracia and Timothy B Noone (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 318–319.
Newman, Barbara, 1985. “Hildegard of Bingen: Visions and Validation,” Church History, 54: 163–75.

Heloise (1100-01?–1163-64?)

Hamilton, Elizabeth, 1966. Heloise, London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Newman, Barbara, 1992. “Authority, Authenticity, and the Repression of Heloise,” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 22: 121–157.
Radice, Betty, 1974. The Letters of Abelard and Heloise, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
Wheeler, Bonnie (ed.), 2000. Listening to Heloise: The Voice of a Twelfth-Century Woman, New York: St. Martin’s.

Akka Mahadevi (c. 1130–1160)

Mudaliar, C. Y., 1991. “Religious Experiences of Hindu Women: A study of Akka Mahadevi,” Mystics Quarterly, 17(3): 137–146.
Narayanan, Vasudha, 2005. “Gender and Priesthood in the Hindu Traditions,” Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies, 18(8).
Prackash, Shiva, 2010. Songs for Siva: Vacanas of Akka Mahadevi (Sacred Literature Trust Series), Vinaya Chaitanya (trans.), Connecticut: Yale University Press.

Herrad of Hohenburg/Landsberg (1130–1195)

Gibson, J., 1989. Herrad of Hohenbourg, Springer Netherlands.
Gibson, J., 1991. “Herrad of Hohenbourg,” A History of Women Philosophers, vol 2, Mary Ellen Waithe (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Clare of Assisi (1194–1253)

Clare of Assisi, 1986. Francis and Clare: The Complete Works, Armstrong, Regis J. and Brady (transl.), Ignatius C. Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Mooney, Catherine M., 2016. Clare of Assisi and the Thirteenth-Century Church. Religious Women, Rules, and Resistance, University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mueller, Joan, 2006. The Privilege of Poverty: Clare of Assisi, Agnes of Prague, and the Struggle for a Franciscan Rule for Women, University Park: Penn State University Press.

Hadewijch (fl. 13^th c.)

Hadewijch, 1980. The Complete Works, Mother Columba Hart (ed. & transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Hadewijch. Visioenen, 1924–1925, 2 vols., Jozef Van Mierlo (ed.), Louvain: Vlaamsch Boekenhalle.
Hadewijch. Brieven, 1924–1925, 2 vols, Jozef Van Mierlo (ed.), Louvain: Vlaamsch Boekenhalle.
McGinn, Bernard (ed.), 1994. Meister Eckhart and the Beguine Mystics: Hadewijch of Brabant, Mechtild of Magdeburg, and Marguerite Porete, New York: Continuum.
Suydam, Mary, 1996. “The Politics of Authorship: Hadewijch of Antwerp and the Mengeldichten,” Mystics Quarterly, 22(1): 2–20.
Suydam, Mary, 1996. “The Touch of Satisfaction: Visions and Religious Experience According to Hadewijch of Antwerp,” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 12: 5–27.

The Beguines

Field, S. L., 2012. The Beguine, the Angel, and the Inquisitor: The Trials of Marguerite Porete and Guiard of Cressonessart, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Marin, J., 2010. “Annihilation and Deification in Beguine Theology and Marguerite Porete’s Mirror of Simple Souls,” Harvard Theological Review, 103: 89–109.
McDonnell, E.W., 1954. The Beguines and Beghards in Medieval Culture: With Special Emphasis on the Belgian Scene, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Murk-Jansen, S., 2004. Brides in the Desert: the spirituality of the Beguines, Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Neel, C., 1989. “The origins of the beguines,” Signs, 14: 321–341.
Simons, Walter, 2001. Cities of Ladies: Beguine Communities in the Medieval Low Countries, 1200–1565, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978–0-8122–1853–4.

Mechthild of Magdeburg (1207?–1282/1294)

Mechthild of Magdeburg, 1998. Mechthild of Magdeburg, The Flowing Light of the Godhead, Frank Tobin (transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Duran, Jane 2005. “Mechthild of Magdeburg: Women Philosophers and the Visionary Tradition,” New Blackfriars, 87 (1007): 43–49.
Hollywood, Amy, 1995. The Soul as Virgin Wife: Mechthild of Magdeburg, Marguerite of Porete, and Meister Eckhart, Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Poor, Sara, 2004. Mechthild of Magdeburg and Her Book: Gender and the Making of Textual Authority, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Roberts, Michelle Voss, 2009. “Retrieving Humility: Rhetoric, Authority, and Divinization in Mechthild of Magdeburg,” Feminist Theology 18 (1):50–73.
Tobin, Frank, 1995. Mechthild von Magdeburg: A Medieval Mystic in Modern Eyes, Columbia SC: Camden House.

Margaret of Oingt (1240?–1310)

Margaret of Oingt, 1990. The Writings of Margaret of Oingt, Medieval Prioress and Mystic (d. 1310), translated with an introduction, essay, and notes by Renate Blumenfeld-Kosinski, Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Margaret of Oingt, 1965. Les Oeuvres de Marguerite d’Oingt (Publications de l’Institut de Linguistique Romane de Lyon 21), Duraffour, A., Gardette, P. & Durdilly, P. (eds. and transl.), Paris: Belles Lettres.
Paulsell, Stephanie, 1991. “Writing and Mystical Experience in Marguerite d’Oingt and Virginia Woolf,” Comparative Literature 44 (3): 249–267.

Angela of Foligno (1248–1309)

Angela of Foligno, 1993. Angela of Foligno: Complete Works, Paul Lachance (transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Angela of Foligno, 2013. Angela da Foligno, Memoriale, Enrico Menestò (ed.), Spoleto: Fondazione Centro Italiano di Studi sull’alto Medioevo.
Judge, Jennifer, 2007. “Female as Flesh in the Latter Middle Ages and the ‘Bodily Knowing’ of Angela of Foligno,” in The Catholic Church and Unruly Women Writers, Jeana DelRosso et al. (eds.), NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 9–23.
Mazzoni, Cristina M., 1991. “Feminism, Abjection, Transgression: Angela of Foligno and the Twentieth Century,” Mystics Quarterly 17 (2): 61–70.
Newman, Barbara, 2016. “Annihilation and Authorship: Three Women Mystics of the 1290s,” Speculum 91 (3): 591–630. [includes sections on Mechthild of Hackeborn, Angela of Foligno, and Marguerite Porete]

Marguerite Porete (1250–1310)

Books

Porete, Marguerite, 1993. Marguerite Porete: The Mirror of Simple Souls, E.L. Babinsky (transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Porete, Marguerite, 1986. Le Mirouer des simple ames, Romana Guarnieri (ed.), Turnhout: Brepols.
Field, S. L., 2012. The Beguine, the Angel, and the Inquisitor: The Trials of Marguerite Porete and Guiard of Cressonessart, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Articles

King, Peter, 2018. “Marguerite Porete and Godfrey of Fontaines: Detachable Will, Discardable Virtue, Transformative Love,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 6 (1): 168–188.
Marin, Juan, 2010. “Annihilation and Deification in Beguine Theology and Marguerite Porete’s Mirror of Simple Souls,” The Harvard Theological Review 103 (1): 89–102.
Newman, Barbara, 2016. “Annihilation and Authorship: Three Women Mystics of the 1290s,” Speculum 91 (3): 591–630. [includes sections on Mechthild of Hackeborn, Angela of Foligno, and Marguerite Porete]

Gertrude of Helfta (1256–1302)

Gertrude of Helfta, 1993. The Herald of Divine Love, trans. and ed. Margaret Winkworth (ed. & transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
St Gertrude the Great and the Religious of her Monastery, 2002. Life and Revelations of Saint Gertrude the Great, Charlotte, North Carolina: TAN Books.

Julian of Norwich (1343–1416?)

Books

Julian of Norwich, 1978. Julian of Norwich: Showings, Edmund Colledge and James Walsh (transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Julian of Norwich, 2013. The Showings of Julian of Norwich: A New Translation, Mirabai Starr (transl.), Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing Company, Inc.
Julian of Norwich, 1978. A Book of Showings to the Anchoress Julian of Norwich (Studies and Texts 35), E. Colledge and J. Walsh (eds.), 2 vols., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
Turner, Denys, 2013. Julian of Norwich: Theologian, New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

Articles

Adams, Marilyn, 2011. “Julian of Norwich: Problems of Evil and the Seriousness of Sin,” Philosophia, 39(3): 433–447.
Bauerschmidt, Frederick Christian, 1997. “Julian of Norwich-Incorporated,” Modern Theology, 13(1): 75–100.
Hartmann, J., 1962. “The Revelations of Divine Love of Julian of Norwich,” Augustinianum, 2(2): 446–447.
Hide, Kerrie, 2000. “As verily as God is our Father as verily God is our Mother: the doctrine of the Fatherhood and Motherhood of God in the Showings of Julian of Norwich,” Australasian Catholic Record, 77(3): 259–268.
Johnson, Lynn Staley, 1991. “The trope of the scribe and the question of literary authority in the works of Julian of Norwich and Margery Kempe,” Speculum, 66(4): 820–838.
Logarbo, Mona, 1986. “Salvation Theology in Julian of Norwich,” Thought, 61(3): 370–380.
Park, M. L. Del Mastro, 1989. “Julian of Norwich,” Thought, 64(4): 415–416.
Robertson, Elizabeth, 1993. “Medieval Medical Views of Women and Female Spirituality in the Ancrene Wisse and Julian of Norwich’s Showings,” in Feminist Approaches to the Body in Medieval Literature, L. Lomperis and S. Stanbury (eds.), Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 142 – 167.
Turner, Denys, 2004. “ ‘Sin is behovely’ in Julian of Norwich's revelations of divine love 1,” Modern Theology, 20(3): 407–422.
Watson, Nicholas, 1993. “The Composition of Julian of Norwich’s Revelation of Love,” Speculum, 68(3): 637–683.

Catherine of Siena (1347–1380)

Catherine of Siena, 1980. Catherine of Siena: The Dialogue, Suzanne Noffke (transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Catherine of Siena. Libro della divina dottrina volgarmente detto Dialogo della divina Provvidenza [available online]
Butler, Josephine E., 1878. Catharine of Siena: A Biography. London: Horace Marshall.
Larson, J., 1999. “Josephine Butler’s Catharine of Siena: Writing (Auto)Biography as a Feminist Spiritual Practice,” Christianity and Literature 48 (4): 445–471.

Christine de Pizan (1364–1430?)

Books

de Pizan, Christine, 1989. A Medieval Woman’s Mirror of Honor, Charity Cannon Willard (transl.), New York: Persea Books.
de Pizan, Christine, 1997. The selected writings of Christine de Pizan: new translations, criticism, Renate Blumenfeld-Kosinski (trans. and ed.) and Kevin Brownlee (ed.), New York: WW Norton & Company.
de Pizan, Christine, 1998. The Book of the City of Ladies, Earl Richards (transl.), New York: Persea Books.
de Pizan, Christine, 1999. The Book of the City of Ladies, Rosalind Brown-Grant (transl.), London: Penguin.
Altmann, B. K., and McGrady, D. L. (eds.), 2003. Christine de Pizan: a casebook, Vol. 34, Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Bell, S. G., 2004. The lost tapestries of the City of ladies: Christine de Pizan’s Renaissance legacy, California: University of California Press.
Birk, B. A., 2004. Christine de Pizan and biblical Wisdom: A feminist-theological point of view (Marquette Studies in Theology: 47), Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Brabant, Margaret (ed.), 1992. Politics, Gender, and Genre: The Political Thought of Christine de Pizan, Boulder: Westview Press.
Desmond, M., 1998. Christine de Pizan and the Categories of Difference, University of Minnesota Press.
Forhan, K. L., 2002. The political theory of Christine de Pizan, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zimmermann, M. & De Rentiis, D. (eds.), 1994. The city of scholars: new approaches to Christine de Pizan, Walter de Gruyter Inc.

Articles

Bell, S. G., 1976. “Christine de Pizan (1364–1430): Humanism and the Problem of a Studious Woman,” Feminist Studies, 3(3/4): 173–184.
Berges, Sandrine, 2013. “Teaching Christine de Pizan in Turkey,” Gender and Education, 25(5):595–605.
Blumenfeld-Kosinski, Renate, 2000. “Saintly Scenarios in Christine de Pizan’s Livre des trios vertus,” Mediaeval Studies, 62(1): 255–292.
Bornstein, Diane, 1977. “French Influence on Fifteenth-Century English Prose as Exemplified by the Translation of Christine de Pisan’s Livre du corps de policie,” Mediaeval Studies, 39(1): 369–386.
Dudash, Susan J., 2003. “Christine de Pizan and the ‘menu peuple’,” Speculum, 78(3): 788–831.
Margolis, Nadia, 1996. “The Cry of the Chameleon: Evolving Voices in the Epistles of Christine de Pizan,” Disputatio, 1: 37–70.
Margolis, Nadia, 1986. “Christine De Pizan: The Poetess as Historian,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 47(3): 361–375.
Martínez, María Lara, 2011. “La emancipación de la mujer en la obra de Christine de Pisan,” Astrolabio: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 11: 239–245.
Green, Karen, 1994. “Christine de Pisan and Thomas Hobbes,” Philosophical Quarterly, 44(177): 456–475.
Green, Karen, 2010. “What Were the Ladies in the City of Ladies Reading? The Libraries of Christine de Pizan’s Contemporaries,” Medievalia Et Humanistica, 36: 77–100.
Green, Karen, 2011. “Isolated individual or member of a Feminine Courtly Community? Christine de Pizan’s milieu,” in Communities of Learning: Networks and the Shaping of Intellectual Identity in Europe 1100–1500, Constant J. Mews & Crossley John (eds.), Belgium: Brepols.
Green, Karen, 2019. “Virtue Ethics and the Origins of Feminism: The Case of Christine de Pizan,” in E. O’Neill and M. Lascano (eds.), Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 261–279.
Kirshner, Julius, 2012. “Was bartolo da sassoferrato a source for Christine de pizan?” Mediaeval Studies, 74: 263–282.
König-Pralong, Catherine, 2012. “Métaphysique, théologie et politique culturelle chez Christine de Pizan,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie, 59(2).
Paakkinen, Ilse, 2010. “The case of widows: Christine de Pizan on defending the rights of widows,” in The Nature of Rights: Moral and Political Aspects of Rights in Late Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, Virpi Mäkinen (ed.), The Philosophical Society of Finland.
Primi, Alice, 2011. “Écrits féministes de Christine de Pizan à Simone de Beauvoir, anthologie réunie et présentée par Nicole Pellegrin,” Clio, 2:15–15.
Rudan, Paola, 2016. “Riscrivere la storia, fare la storia. Sulla donna come soggetto in Christine de Pizan e Margeret Cavendish,” Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 28 (54): 21–41.

Other Medieval Philosophy

Primary sources

Ebner, Margaret, 1993. Margaret Ebner: Major Works. Leonard Hindsely (ed. & transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.
Mechthild of Hackeborn, 2017. The Book of Special Grace, Barbara Newman (transl.), Mahwah: Paulist Press.

Secondary sources

Borresen, Kari Elisabeth, 1994. “Patristic ‘Feminism’: The Case of Augustine,” Augustinian Studies, 25: 139–152.
de Töth, Pietro Tommaso, 1908. Storia di S. Chiara da Montefalco secondo un antico documento dell’anno 1308. Siena: tip. pont. S. Bernardino.
Hartel, Joseph, 1996. “The Integral Feminism of St. Thomas Aquinas,” Gregorianum, 77(3): 527–547.
Hollywood, Amy M., 1994. “Beauvoir, Irigaray, and the Mystical,” Hypatia, 9(4): 158–185.
McLaughlin, Mary M., 1975. “Peter Abelard and the Dignity of Women: Twelfth-Century ‘Feminism’ in Theory and Practice,” in Pierre Abélard, Pierre le Vénérable: les courants philosophiques, littéraires et artistiques en Occident au milieu du XIIe siècle: [actes et mémoires du colloque international], Abbaye de Cluny, 2 au 9 juillet 1972, Paris: Editions du centre national de la recherche scientifique.

Renaissance and Sixteenth Century Philosophy

General Renaissance and Sixteenth

Books

Benson, P. J., 2010. Invention of the Renaissance Woman: The Challenge of Female Independence in the Literature and Thought of Italy and England, Penn State Press.
Cohn, S. K., 1996. Women in the streets: essays on sex and power in Renaissance Italy, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Colonna, Vittoria, Chiara Matraini, and Lucrezia Marinella, 2008. Who is Mary?: Three Early Modern Women on the Idea of the Virgin Mary, Susan Haskins (ed. and trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Includes Vittoria Colonna, Chiara Matraini, and Lucrezia Marinella.]
Ferguson, M. W., M. Quilligan, and N. J. Vickers, 1986. Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, F. H., 1997. Defining the Renaissance virtuosa: women artists and the language of art history and criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, C., 1990. Renaissance Feminism: Literary Texts and Political Models, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kuehn, T. 1994. Law, Family, and Women: Toward a Legal Anthropology of Renaissance Italy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, M. L., 1997. Her Immaculate Hand: Selected Works by and about the Women Humanists of Quattrocento Italy, Medieval & and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 20, Binghamton, New York: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.
King, M. L., 1991. Women of the Renaissance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maclean, I., 1980. The Renaissance Notion of Woman: A Study in the Fortunes of Scholasticism and Medical Science in European Intellectual Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merchant, Carolyn, 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Richardson, Lula McDowell, 1928. The Forerunners of Feminism in French Literature of the Renaissance: From Christine of Pisa to Marie de Gournay, Johns Hopkins studies in Romance Literatures and Languages, 12, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ross, S. G., 2009, The Birth of Feminism: Woman as Intellect in Renaissance Italy and England, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. [Sections are organized by topic, not women. Focus is on 19 women writers from 1400–1700, including interesting discussions about “the intellectual family”. Includes Marinella and Isotta Nogarola.]

Articles

Banic-Pajnic, Erna, 2004. “Women in Renaissance Philosophy,” Prilozi za Istrazivanje Hrvatske Filozofske Bastine, 59–60(1–2): 69–89.
Cox, V., 1995. “The Single Self: Feminist Thought and the Marriage Market in Early Modern Venice,” Renaissance Quarterly, 48(3): 513–81.
Gibson, Joan, 1989. “Educating for Silence: Renaissance Women and the Language Arts,” Hypatia, 4: 9–27.
Hurlburt, H. S., 2007. “A Renaissance for Renaissance Women?” Journal of Women’s History, 19(2): 193–201.
King, M., 1980. “Book-Lined Cells: Women and Humanism in the Early Italian Renaissance,” in Beyond Their Sex: Learned Women of the European Past, P. H. Labalme (ed.), New York and London: New York University Press, 66–90.
Kraye, J., 1994. “The Transformation of Plato in the Renaissance,” in Platonism and the English Imagination, A. Baldwin and S. Hutton (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Isotta Nogarola (1418–1466)

Nogarola, Isotta, 1886. Opera quae supersunt omnia; accedunt Angelae et Zeneverae Nogarolae epistolae et carmna, 2 vols, Abel, Eugenius and Alexander Apponyi (eds.), Vienna: Gerold et socii; Budapest: Fridericus Kilian.
Nogarola, Isotta, 2004. Complete Writings: Letterbook, Dialogue on Adam and Eve, Orations, King, Margaret L. and Diana Robin (eds. & transl.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Boršić, Luka and Ivana Skuhala Karasman, 2015. “Isotta Nogarola–the Beginning of Gender Equality in Europe,” The Monist (98): 43–52.
Jardine, Lisa 1983. “Isotta Nogarola: Women humanists – Education for what?” in History of Education 12 (4): 231–244.
Jardine, Lisa 1985. “ ‘O Decus Italiae Virgo’, or The Myth of the Learned Lady in the Re-naissance,” The Historical Journal (28): 799–819.
King, Margaret L., 1978. “The Religious Retreat of Isotta Nogarola (1418–1466): Sexism and Its Consequences in the Fifteenth Century,” Signs 3 (4): 807–822.
Parker, Holt, 2002. “Angela Nogarola (ca. 1400) and Isotta Nogarola (1418–1466): Thieves of Language,” in Women Writing Latin: From Roman Antiquity to Early Modern Europe, Laurie J. Churchill, Phyllis R. Brown, and Jane E. Jeffrey (eds.), New York: Routledge, 11–30.

Cassandra Fedele (1465–1558)

Fedele, C., 2007. Letters and orations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, Margaret L., and Albert Rabil Jr. (transl. and eds.), 1983. Her Immaculate Hand: Selected Works by and about the Women Humanists of Quattrocento Italy, Binghamton, N.Y.: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies. [contains Fedele’s “Oration for Bertucio Lamberto, Receiving the Honors of the Liberal Arts,” “Letters: (a) Alessandra Scala to Cassandra; (b) Cassandra to Alessandra,” “Oration in praise of letters,” and “Oration to the Ruler of Venice, Francesco Venerio, on the arrival of the Queen of Poland.”]
Mayer, T. F. and Woolf, D. R., 1995. The rhetorics of life-writing in early modern Europe: forms of biography from Cassandra Fedele to Louis XIV, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ross, S. G., 2007. “Her Father’s Daughter: Cassandra Fedele, Woman Humanist of the Venetian Republic,” in COLLeGIUM: Studies Across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Volume 2: The Trouble with Ribs: Women, Men and Gender in Early Modern Europe, Anu Korhonen and Kate Lowe (eds.).

Laura Cereta (1469–1499)

Cereta, L., 1997. Collected letters of a Renaissance feminist, Diane Robin (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gill, A. M., 2009. “Fraught Relations in the Letters of Laura Cereta: Marriage, Friendship, and Humanist Epistolarity,” Renaissance Quarterly, 62(4): 1098–1129.
Rabil, A., 1981. “Laura Cereta: Quattrocento Humanist,” Renaissance Quarterly, 36(2): 231–33.

Veronica Gambara (1485–1550)

Gambara, V., 1890. Sonetti amorosi inediti o rari, L. Battei.
Gambara, V., 1995. Le rime, Alan Bullock (ed.), Firenze: Leo S. Olschki.
Gambara, V., 2012. Rime E Lettere Di Veronica Gambara, Nabu Press.
Bozzetti, C., P. Gibellini & E. Sandal (eds.), 1989. Veronica Gambara e la poesia del suo tempo nell’Italia settentrionale: atti del convegno, Brescia-Correggio 17–19 ottobre 1985, Olschki.

Henricus Cornelius Agrippa (1486–1535)

Agrippa, Henricus Cornelius, 1540. Vom Adel und Fürtreffen weibliches Geschlechts, Johannes Heroldt (transl.).
Agrippa, Henricus Cornelius, 1996. Declamation on the Nobility and Preeminence of the Female Sex, Albert Rabil Jr. (ed. & transl.), Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Newman, Barbara, 1993. “Renaissance Feminism and Esoteric Theology: The Case of Cornelius Agrippa”, Viator (24): 337–56.

Francis Bacon (1561–1626)

Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1980. “Baconian Science: A Hermaphroditic Birth,” Philosophical Forum, 11(3): 299–308.
Landau, Iddo, 1998. “Feminist Criticisms of Metaphors in Bacon’s Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, 73(283): 47–61.

Oliva Sabuco de Nantes (1562–1626?)

Books

Sabuco de Nantes Barerra, Oliva, 1981. Nueva filosofía de la naturaleza del hombre y otros escritos, Tomé, A. M. (ed.), Madrid: Editora Nacional.
Sabuco de Nantes Barerra, Oliva, 2007. New philosophy of human nature neither known to nor attained by the great ancient philosophers, which will improve human life and health, M.E. Waithe, M. Vintró, C.A. Zorita (eds. & transl.), Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Sabuco de Nantes Barerra, Oliva, 2010. The true medicine, Gianna Pomata (ed. & transl.). Toronto: Iter Inc.

Articles

Barbone, Steven, 2015. “Oliva Sabuco and the matter of the matter,” Society and politics 9 (1): 25–37.
Barona, J. L., 1993. “The body republic: social order and human body in Renaissance medical thought,” History of philosophical life sciences 15 (2): 165–80.
Talamo, P., 2002. “Passioni e malattie nella Nueva filosofía di Oliva Sabuco de Nantes,” Bruniana e campanelliana; ricerche filosofique e materiali storico-testuali 12 (1): 201–6.
Vintró, Maria and Mary Ellen Waithe, 2003. “Fué Oliva o fué Miguel: el caso del Sabuco,” Boletín de biblioteca nacional de México, (Ciudad México) primer y segundo semestres de 2002 nueva época (1–2): 11–37.
Waithe, Mary Ellen, 1989. “Oliva Sabuco de Nantes Barrera,” in Waithe, Mary Ellen (ed.): A history of women philosophers. Volume 2, 500–1600. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 261–83.
Waithe, Mary Ellen & Vintró, Maria 2003. “Posthumously plagiarizing Oliva Sabuco: an appeal to cataloguing librarians,” Cataloguing and classification quarterly 35 (3–4): 525–40.

Lucrezia Marinella (1571–1653)

Books

Marinella, L., 1999. The Nobility and Excellence of Women, and the Defects and Vices of Men, Anne Dunhill (trans.), Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Colonna, V., Chiara Matraini, and Lucrezia Marinella, 2008. Who is Mary?: Three early modern women on the idea of the Virgin Mary, Susan Haskins (transl.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marinella, L., 2009. Enrico; or, Byzantium Conquered: A Heroic Poem, Maria Galli Stampino (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Articles

Chemello, A, 2000. “The rhetoric of eulogy in Marinella’s La nobiltà e l’eccelenza delle donne,” in Women in Italian Renaissance Culture and Society, Panniza, L. (ed.), London: Legenda, 463–77.
Kolsky, S., 2001. “Moderata Fonte, Lucrezia Marinella, Guiseppe Passi: An Early Seventeenth-Century Feminist controversy,” The Modern Language Review, 96(4): 973–89.
Malpezzi Price, P., and C. Ristaino, 2008. “Lucrezia Marinella and the ‘Querelle des Femmes’,” in Seventeenth-Century Italy, Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

Other Renaissance and Sixteenth Century Philosophy

Primary sources

[anon.] Disputatio nova contra mulieres, qua probatur eas Homines non esse (1595); translated in “Women Are Not Human”: An Anonymous Treatise and Responses, Theresa M. Kenney ed. and transl. (Lexington: Crossroad Publishing, 1998)
Gediccus, Simon, 1595. Defensio sexus muliebris, opposita futilissimae disputationi recens editae, qua suppresso authoris & typographi nomine blashpehme contenditur, Mulieres homines non esse, Leipzig (transl. in “Women Are Not Human”: An Anonymous Treatise and Responses, Theresa M. Kenney ed. and transl., Lexington: Crossroad Publishing, 1998, 43–88).

Secondary sources

Curtis-Wendlandt, Lisa, 2004. “Conversing on Love: Text and Subtext in Tullia d’Aragona’s Dialogo della Infinita d’Amore,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(4): 77–98.
Fleischer, Manfred, 1981. “ ‘Are Women Human?’—The Debate of 1595 between Valens Acidalius and Simon Gediccus,” The Sixteenth Century Journal 12 (2): 107–120.

Seventeenth Century Philosophy

General Seventeenth

Books

Adam, Antoine, 1986. Les Libertins au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.
Atherton, Margaret (ed.), 1994. Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Boros, Gábor, Herman De Dijn, and Martin Moors (eds.), 2007. The concept of love in 17th and 18th century philosophy, Leuven University Press. [Includes a chapter on the Masam-Astell exchange. Also included in the 18th Century Philosophers Section]
Broad, Jacqueline, 2002. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Focuses on Elizabeth of Bohemia, Cavendish, Conway, Astell, Masham, Cockburn]
Conley, John J., 2002. The Suspicion of Virtue: Women Philosophers in Neoclassical France, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [Includes Madame de Sablé, Madame Deshoulières, Madame de la Sabliére, Mlle de la Vallière, and Madame de Maintenon]
Courtney, William Leonard, 1888. Studies new and old, London: Chapman and Hall. [Includes an entire chapter dedicated to Jacqueline. Also includes a chapter on Princess Elisabeth and Descartes.]
Craveri, Benedetta and Teresa Waugh, 2005. The Age of Conversation, New York: New York Review Books. [Includes chapters dedicated to de Sable, de la Sabliere, de Maintenon, and others. Spans 17th and 18th Centuries.]
Fara, P, 2004. Pandora’s breeches: Women, science and power in the enlightenment, London: Random House. [Sections dedicated to Elisabeth/Descartes, Conway/Leibniz, Chatelet/Newton, among others. Spans 17th and 18th Centuries]
Lougee, Carolyn, 1976. Le paradis des femmes: Women, Salons, and Social Stratification in Seventeenth-Century France, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pal, Carol, 2012. Republic of Women: Rethinking the Republic of Letters in the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Includes chapters on Elisabeth of Bohemia, Anna Maria van Schurman, Dorothy Moore, Katherine Jones, and Bathsua Makin.]
Smith, Hilda L., 1982. Reason’s Disciples: Seventeenth-Century English Feminists, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Spalding-Andréolle, Donna and Véronique Molinari (eds.), 2011, Women and Science, 17th Century to Present: Pioneers, Activists and Protagonists, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. [Chapter 2 is on d’Arconville, chapter 1 is on Margaret Cavendish and Anne Conway]

Articles

Deckard, Michael Funk, 2012. “Acts of Admiration: Wondrous Women in Early Modern Philosophy,” Journal of Early Modern Studies, 1(1). [Elisabeth, Anne Finch/Conway,Mary Astell, and others]
Findlen, Paula, 2002. “Ideas in the Mind: Gender and Knowledge in the Seventeenth Century,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 17(1): 183–196.
Giglioni, Guido, 2003. “Between Exclusion and Seclusion: The Precarious and Elusive Place of Women in Early-Modern Thought,” Configurations, 11(1): 111–122.
James, Susan, 2002. “The Passions and Philosophy,” in Feminism and History of Philosophy, Genevieve Lloyd (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 131–159.
Lascano, Marcy, forthcoming. “Early Modern Women on the Cosmological Argument: A Case Study in Feminist History of Philosophy,” in Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, E. O’Neill and M. Lascano (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer.
O’Neill, Eileen, 1998. “Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Philosophers and Their Fate in History,” in Philosophy in a Feminist Voice, Janet Kourany (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, Eileen, 1999. “Women Cartesians, ‘Feminine Philosophy,’ and Historical Exclusion,” in Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes, Susan Bordo (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
O’Neill, Eileen, 2005. “Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy,” Hypatia, 20(3): 185–197. [Interesting overview that orients many of the women on the list into a conceptual map.]
Pateman, Carole, 1988. “Patriarchal Confusions,” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 3: 127–143.
Rogers, G.A.J., 2004. “Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century,” Philosophical Books, 45(4): 335–339.
Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 1982. “Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth Century English Political Thought,” in The Family in Political Thought, Jean Bethke Elshtain (ed.), Brighton: Harvester Press.
Shapiro, Lisa, 2004. “Some Thoughts on the Place of Women in Early Modern Philosophy,” in Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy, L. Alanen and C. Witt (eds.), Klewer Academic Publishing, 219–250.
Watts, R., 2005. “Gender, science and modernity in seventeenth‐century England,” Paedagogica historica, 41(1–2), 79–93.
Zedler, Beatrice H., 1989. “The three princesses,” Hypatia, 4(1): 28–63.

Marie de Gournay (1565–1645)

Books

Devincenzo, Giovanna, 2002. Marie de Gournay: Un cas littéraire, Fasano: Schena Editore/Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
Fogel, Michèle, 2004. Marie de Gournay: itinéraries d’une femme savante, Paris: Fayard.
Franchetti, Anna Lia, 2006. L’ombre discourante de Marie de Gournay, Paris: Honoré Champion Éditeur.
Gournay, Marie de, 1993. Égalité des hommes et des femmes, Grief des dames, suivi du Proumenoir de Monsieur de Montaigne, Texte établi, annoté et commenté par Constant Venesoen, Genève: Librairie Drozsa.
Gournay, Marie le Jars de, 1997–2002 [1641]. Les Advis, ou, les Presens de la Demoiselle de Gournay, 2 volumes, J. P. Beaulieu and H. Fournier (eds.), Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA.
Gournay, Marie le Jars de, 1998. Preface to the Essays of Montaigne, Richard Hollman and Colette Quesnel (eds. and transl.), Tempe, AZ: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.
Gournay, Marie le Jars de, 2002. Apology for the Woman Writing and Other Works, R. Hillman and C. Quesnel (eds. and trans.), Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Gournay, Marie le Jars de, 2002. Oeuvres complètes, Jean-Claude Arnould, Évelyne Berriot, Claude Blum, Anna Lia Franchetti, Marie-Claire Thomine and Valerie Worth-Stylianou (eds.), Paris: Champion.
Butterworth, Emily, 2006. Poisoned Words: Slander and Satire in Early Modern France, London: Legenda. [includes a chapter dedicated to de Gournay on moral issues of slander.]
Clarke, Desmond M., 2013. The Equality of the Sexes: Three Feminist Texts of the Seventeenth Century, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Includes de Gournay, van Schurman, and Franҫoise Poulain de la Barre.]
Ilsley, Marjorie Henry, 1963. A Daughter of the Renaissance: Marie le Jars de Gournay, Her Life and Works, The Hague: Mouton.
Noiset, Marie-Thérèse, 2004. Marie de Gournay et son oeuvre, Jambes, Belgique: Les éditions namuroises.
Schiff, Mario, 1910. Marie de Gournay, Paris: Honoré Champion.

Articles

Bauschatz, Cathleen M., 1995. “Marie de Gournay’s Gendered Images for Language and Poetry,” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 25: 489–500.
Bijvoet, Maya, 1989. “Marie de Gournay: Editor of Montaigne,” in Women Writers of the Seventeenth Century, Katharina M. Wilson and Frank J. Warnke (eds.), Athens/London: University of Georgia Press.
Cholakian, Patricia Francis, 1995. “The Economics of Friendship: Gournay’s Apologie pour celle qui escrit,” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 25: 407–17.
Deslauriers, Marguerite, 2008. “One Soul in Two Bodies: Marie de Gournay and Montaigne,” Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 13(2): 5–15.
Dotoli, Giovanni, 1997. “Montaigne et les libertins via Mlle de Gournay,” in Montaigne et Marie de Gournay: actes du Colloque international de Duke, réunis et présentés par Marcel Tetel, Paris: Honoré Champion Éditeur.
Lewis, Douglas, 1999. “Marie de Gournay and the Engendering of Equality,” Teaching Philosophy, 22(1): 53–76.
Mathieu-Castellani, Gisèle, 1997. “La quenouille ou la lyre: Marie de Gournay et la cause des femmes,” in Montaigne et Marie de Gournay: actes du Colloque international de Duke, réunis et présentés par Marcel Tetel, Paris: Honoré Champion Éditeur.
O’Neill, Eileen, 2007. “Justifying the Inclusion of Women in our Histories of Philosophy: The Case of Marie de Gournay,” in The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy, L. M. Alcoff and E. F. Kittay (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Zedler, Beatrice H., 1989. “Marie le Jars de Gournay,” in A History of Women Philosophers, Volume II: Medieval, Renaissance and Enlightenment, A. D. 500–1600, Norwell: Kluwer.

Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679)

Dalitz, Renée J., 1993. “The Subjection of Women in the Contractual Society,” in Empirical Logic and Public Debate, Erik C. W. Krabbe (ed.), Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Duran Forero, Rosalba, 2000. “Hobbes y Spinoza: Un contrapunto sobre la igualdad,” Apuntes Filosoficos, 16: 9–19.
Green, Karen, 1994. “Christine de Pisan and Thomas Hobbes,” Philosophical Quarterly, 44(177): 456–475.
Hiaschmann, Nancy J. and Joanne H. Wright (eds.), 2012. Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Stefano, Christine Di, 1983. “Masculinity as Ideology in Political Theory: Hobbesian Man Considered,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 6(6).

Angelique Arnauld (1591–1661)

Arnauld, Angélique, 1757. Entretiens ou conférences de la Révérende Mère Angélique Arnauld, abbesse et réformatrice de Port-Royal, Brussels: A. Boudet.
Arnauld, Angélique, 1742–44. Lettres de la Révérende Mère Marie-Angélique Arnauld, abbesse et réformatrice de Port-Royal, 3 vols., Utrecht: Aux dépens de la Compagnie.
Bugnion-Secrétan, Perle 1991. La Mère Angélique Arnauld, 1591–1661, après ses écrits, Paris: Cerf.
Kostroun, Daniella 2011. Feminism, Absolutism, and Jansenism: Louis XIV and the Port-Royal Nuns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Agnes Arnauld (1593–1671)

Arnauld, Agnès, 1665. L’image d’une religieuse parfaite et d’une imparfaite, avec les occupations intérieures pour toute la journée, Paris: Charles Savreux.
Arnauld, Agnès, 1718. Avis donnés par la Mère Cathérine Agnès de Saint-Paul, Sur la conduite que les religieuses doivent garder, au cas qu’ill arrivât du changement dans le government de sa maison.
Arnauld, Agnès 1858. Lettres de la Mère Agnès Arnauld, abbesse de Port-Royal, Faugère, Prosper and Rachel Gillet (eds.), 2 vols. Paris: Benjamin Duprat.
Armogathe, Robert, 1990. “Le chapelet secret de Mère Agnès Arnauld,” XVIIe siècle (170): 77–86.
Bugnion-Secrétan, Perle, 1996. Mère Agnès Arnauld, 1593–167, Abbesse de Port-Royal. Paris: Cerf.
Carr, Thomas M., 2006. La Voix des abbesses du Grand Siècle: Le prédication au féminin à Port-Royal, Tübingen: Narr.
Mesnard, Jean 1994. “Mère Agnès femme d’action,” Chroniques de Port-Royal (43): 57–80.

Rene Descartes (1596–1650) and Cartesianism

Books

Bordo, Susan, 1987. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture, Albany: SUNY Press.
Bordo, Susan (ed.), 1999. Feminist Interpretations of Rene Descartes, University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
Harth, Erica, 1992. Cartesian Women: Versions and Subversions of Rational Discourse in the Old Regime, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [TOC identifies Elisabeth, du Chatelet, de Gouges.]

Articles

Amoros, Celia, 1994. “Cartesianism and Feminism: What Reason has Forgotten; Reasons for Forgetting,” Hypatia, 9(1): 147–163.
Atherton, Margaret, 1993. “Cartesian Reason and Gendered Reason,” in A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.), Boulder: Westview Press, 19–34.
Berman, Ruth, 1989. “From Aristotle’s Dualism to Materialist Dialectics: Feminist Transformation of Science and Society,” in Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing, Alison M. Jaggar and Susan R. Bordo (eds.), New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Bordo, Susan, 1986. “The Cartesian Masculinization of Thought,” Signs, 11: 439–456.
Cantrell, Carol H., 1990. “Analogy as Destiny: Cartesian Man and the Woman Reader,” Hypatia, 5(2): 7–19.
David, Anthony, 1997. “Le Doeuff and Irigaray on Descartes,” Philosophy Today, 41(3–4), 367–382.
Gatens, Moira, 1998. “Modern Rationalism,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Gertler, Brie, 2002. “Can Feminists Be Cartesians?” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 41(1): 91–112.
Hodge, Joanna, 1998. “Subject, Body, and the Exclusion of Women from Philosophy,” in Feminist Perspectives in Philosophy, Morwenna Griffiths (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 152–168.
LaCaze, Marguerite, 2002. “The Encounter between Wonder and Generosity,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 17(30): 1–19.
Thompson, J., 1983. “Women and the High Priests of Reason,” Radical Philosophy, 34(Summer): 10–14.
Watson, Richard A, 2009. “Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes,” International Studies in Philosophy, 35(1): 133–135.
Wiseman, Mary Bittner, 1993. “Beautiful Exiles in Aesthetics,” in Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective, Hilde Hein (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Bathsua Makin (1600–1675)

Books

Makin, Bathsua, 1993. An essay to revive the antient education of gentlewomen, No. 202. AMS Press.
Ratcliff, Melissa, 2004. The Influence of Bathsua Makin and Puritan Ideals on the Issue of Women’s Education in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century England, Diss. Eckerd College.
Teague, Frances N, 1998. Bathsua Makin: Woman of Learning, Bucknell Univ Press.
Westonia, Elizabetha Johanna, 2000. Neo-Latin Women Writers: Elizabeth Jane Weston and Bathsua Reginald [Makin], Ashgate.

Articles

Brink, Jean R., 1991. “Bathsua Reginald Makin: ‘Most Learned Matron,’” Huntington Library Quarterly, 54(4): 313–326.
Schillace, B. L., 2013. “Reproducing Custom: Mechanical Habits and Female Machines in Augustan Women’s Education,” Feminist Formations, 25(1): 111–137.
Watts, R., 2005. “Gender, science and modernity in seventeenth‐century England,” Paedagogica historica, 41(1–2), 79–93.

Anna Maria van Schurman (1607–1678)

Books

Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1638. Amica Dissertatio inter Annam Mariam Schurmanniam et Andraeam Rivetum, De ingenii muliebris ad scientias, et meliores literas capacitate, Paris.
Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1639. Paelsteen van den tijd onses levens, Dordrecht: Jasper Gorissz.
Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1641. Dissertatio de ingenii muliebris ad doctrinam, et meliores litteras aptitudine, Leiden.
Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1648. Opuscula Hebraea, Graeca, Latina. Gallica. Prosaica et Metrica, Leiden.
Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1673. Eukleriaseu Melioris Partis Electio. Tractatus brevem vitae ejus Delineationem exhibens, Altona and Albim: Cornelis van der Meulen.
Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1728. Geleerde Brieven van de Edele, Deugt- en Konstryke Juffrouw, Anna Maria van Schuurman; gewisselt met de Geleerde en Beroemde Heeren Samuel Rachelius, professor in de Rechten te Kiel en Johan van Beverwijck, Med. Doct. tot Dordrecht, Amsterdam: Johannes van Septeren.
Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1730. Lettres traduites du Hollandois par madame de Zoutelande. Paris: Rebuffé.
Schurman, Anna Maria van, 1998. Whether a Christian Woman Should Be Educated and Other Writings from her Intellectual Circle, Joyce Irwin (ed. and trans.), Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
de Baar, Mirjam, 1986. Choosing the better part: Anna Maria van Schurman (1607–1678), Vol. 146. International Archives of the History of Ideas, Kluwer Academic Pub.
Clarke, Desmond M., 2013. The Equality of the Sexes: Three Feminist Texts of the Seventeenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Includes de Gournay, van Schurman, and Franҫoise Poulain de la Barre.]

Articles

Baar, Mirjam de, 2011. “Gender, Genre and Authority in Seventeenth-Century Religious Writing: Anna Maria van Schurman and Antoinette Bourignon as Contrasting Examples,” in Ein Platz für sich selbst: Schreibende Frauen und ihre Lebenswelten, 1450–1700, A. Bollmann (ed.), Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Bloem, Jeanette, 2004. “The Shaping of a ‘Beautiful’ Soul: The Critical Life of Anna Maria van Schurman,” in Feminism and the Final Foucoult, Dianna Taylor and Karen Vintges (eds.), University of Illinois Press.
Bo, Karen Lee, 2008. “I wish to be nothing: the role of self-denial in the mystical theology of A. M. van Schurman,” in Women, Gender and Radical Religion in Early Modern Europe, Sylvia Brown (ed.), Leiden.
Bulckaert, Barbara, 1997. “L’éducation de la femme dans la correspondance d’Anna Maria van Schurman (1607–1678) et André Rivet (1572–1651),” in La femme lettrée à la Renaissance: Actes du colloque international Bruxelles, 27–29 mars 1996, Michel Bastiaensen (ed.), Brussels: Peeters, 197–209.
Clarke, Desmond M., 2013. “Anna Maria van Schurman and Women’s Education,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 3: 347–360.
Duran, Jane, 2014. “Christianity and Women’s Education: Anna Maria van Schurman and Mary Astell,” Philosophy and Theology: Marquette University Quarterly 26(1): 3–18.
Eck, Caroline van, 1996. “The First Dutch Feminist Tract?: Anna Maria van Schurman’s Discussion of Women’s Aptitude for the Study of Arts and Sciences,” in Choosing the Better Part, Mirjam de Baar et al. (eds.), Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic, 43–54.
Irwin, Joyce, 1977. “Anna Maria van Schurman: From Feminism to Pietism,” Church History (46): 48–62.
Irwin, Joyce, 1991. “Anna Maria van Schurman and Antoinette Bourignon: contrasting examples of seventeenth-century pietism,” Church History, 60(3): 301–15.
Uckelman, Sara L., 2018. “Bathsua Makin and Anna Maria van Schurman: Education and the Metaphysics of Being a Woman,” in Early Modern Women on Metaphysics, Emily Thomas (ed.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 95–110.

Madeleine de Scudery (1607–1701)

Scudéry, Madeleine de, 1644. Les femmes illustres, ou Les harangues héroïques, 2 vols., Paris: Quiney et de Sercy.
Scudéry, Madeleine de, 1684. Conversations Nouvelles sur divers sujets, 2 vols., Paris: Barbin.
Scudéry, Madeleine de 2003. The Story of Sapho, K. Newman (ed. & transl.), Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Scudéry, Madeleine de, 2004. Selected Letters, Orations, and Rhetorical Dialogues, J. Donawerth and J. Strongson (eds. & transl.), Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Aronson, Nicole, 1978. Mademoiselle de Scudéry. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
Green, Karen, 2009. “Madeleine de Scudéry on Love and the Emergence of the ‘Private Sphere,’” History of Political Thought, 30(2): 272–285.
Green, Karen, 2010. “The Amazons and Mademoiselle de Scudéry’s Refashioning of Female Virtue,” in Expanding the Canon of Early Modern Women’s Writing, P. Salzman (ed.), Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars, 150–167.
Niderst, Alain, 1976. Madeleine de Scudéry, Paul Pellisson et leur monde. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Margaret Fell Fox (1614–1702)

Books

Bruyneel, Sally, 2010. Margaret Fell and the End of Time: The Theology of the Mother of Quakerism, Baylor University Press.
Glines, E. F. (ed.), 2003. Undaunted Zeal: The Letters of Margaret Fell, Richmond, IN: Friends United Press.
Kunze, B. Y., 1994. Margaret Fell and the Rise of Quakerism, New York: Macmillan.
Ross, I., 1996. Margaret Fell: Mother of Quakerism, third edition, York: The Ebor Press.
Wallace, T. S. (ed.), 1992. A Sincere and Constant Love: An Introduction to the Work of Margaret Fell, Richmond, IN: Friends United Press.

Articles

Donawerth, J, 2006. “Women’s Reading Practices in Seventeenth-Century England: Margaret Fell’s Women’s Speaking Justified,” Sixteenth Century Journal: Journal of Early Modern Studies, 37(4): 985–1005.
Gardiner, J. K., 1994. “Margaret Fell Fox and Feminist Literary History: ‘A Mother in Israel’ Calls to the Jews,” Prose Studies, 17(3): 42–56.
Guibbory, A., 2000. “Conversation, Conversion, Messianic Redemption: Margaret Fell, Menasseh ben Israel, and the Jews,” in Literary Circles and Cultural Communities in Renaissance England, C. J. Summers and T.-L. Pebworth (eds.), Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 210–234.
Kunze, B. Y., 1988. “Religious Authority and Social Status in Seventeenth-Century England: The Friendship of Margaret Fell, George Fox, and William Penn,” Church History, 57(2): 170–86.
Leucke, M. S., 1997. “‘God Hath Made No Difference Such as Men Would’: Margaret Fell and the Politics of Women’s Speech,” Bunyan Studies, 7: 73–95.
Thickstun, M. O., 1995. “Writing the Spirit: Margaret Fell’s Feminist Critique of Pauline Theology,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 63(2): 269–79.

Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia (1618–1680)

Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia, 2007. Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes, L. Shapiro (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [also see here Elisabeth’s letters to Descartes: [available online]
Courtney, William Leonard, 1888. Studies new and old, London, Chapman and Hall. [Includes an entire chapter dedicated to Jacqueline Pascal, and another on Elisabeth and Descartes.]
Godfrey, Elizabeth (Jessie Bedford), 1909. A Sister of Prince Rupert, Elizabeth Princess Palatine and Abbess of Herford, London: John Lane the Bodley Head.
Nye, Andrea, 1999. The Princess and the Philosopher: Letters of Elisabeth of the Palatine to René Descartes, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Articles

Alanen, Lilli, 2004. “Descartes and Elisabeth: A Philosophical Dialogue?” in Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy, Lilli Alanen and Charlotte Witt (eds.), New York/Dordrecht: Kluwer, 193–218.
Alexandrescu, Vlad, 2012. “What Someone May Have Whispered in Elizabeth’s Ear,” in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4, Daniel Garber and Donald Rutherford (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Apostalova, Iva, 2010. “Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia and Margaret Cavendish: The Feminine Touch in Seventeenth-Century Epistemology,” Maritain Studies (26): 83–97.
Garber, Daniel, 2001. “Understanding Interaction: What Descartes Should Have Told Elisabeth,” in Descartes Embodied: Reading Cartesian Philosophy through Cartesian Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–88.
Hutton, Sarah, 2005. “Women Philosophers and the Early Reception of Descartes: Anne Conway and Princess Elisabeth,” in Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe, Tad M. Schmaltz (ed.), London; New York: Routledge.
Koch, Erec R., 2005. “Cartesian Aesth/Ethics: The Correspondence with Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia,” The Tulane Review, Spring/Summer: 10–15.
Jeffery, Renee, 2017. “The Origins of the Modern Emotions: Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and the Embodied Mind,” History of European Ideas (43): 547–559.
Lee, Kyoo, 2011. “‘Cogito Interruptus’: The Epistolary Body in the Elisabeth-Descartes Correspondence, June 22, 1645-November 3, 1645,” in philoSophia: A Journal of Continental Feminism (1): 173–194.
Lloyd, Genevieve, 2006. “Busy Lives: Descartes and Elisabeth on Time Management and the Philosophical Life,” Australian Feminist Studies, 21(51): 303–311.
Mattern, Ruth, 1978. “Descartes’s correspondence with Elizabeth: concerning both the union and distinction of mind and body,” in Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays, Michael Hooker (ed.), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 212–222.
Nye, Andrea, 1996. “Polity and Prudence: The Ethics of Elisabeth, Princess Palatine,” in Hypatia’s Daughters: Fifteen Hundred Years of Women Philosophers, Linda Lopez McAlister (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pellegrin, M-F. and D. Kolesnik (eds.), 2013. Elisabeth de Boheme face a Descartes: Deux Philosophes, Paris: Vrin, 155–169.
Schmaltz, Ted, 2019. “Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia on the Cartesian Mind: Interaction, Happiness, Freedom,” in Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, Eileen O’Neill and Marcy Lascano (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 155–173.
Shapiro, Lisa, 1999. “Princess Elisabeth and Descartes: The Union of Soul and Body and the Practice of Philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(3): 503–520. Reprinted in Feminism and History of Philosophy, Genevieve Lloyd (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, 182–203.
Shapiro, Lisa, 2013. “Elisabeth, Descartes, et la psychologie morale du regret,” in Elisabeth de Boheme face a Descartes: Deux Philosophes, M-F. Pellegrin and D. Kolesnik (eds.), Paris: Vrin, 155–169.
Sievert, Don, 2002. “Elizabeth and Descartes on the Possibility of Mind-Body Interaction,” Southwest Philosophy Review, 18: 149–54.
Tollefsen, Deborah, 1999. “Princess Elisabeth and the Problem of Mind-Body Interaction,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(3): 59–77.
Wartenberg, Thomas E., 1999. “Descartes’s Mood: The Question of Feminism in the Correspondence with Elisabeth,” in Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes, Susan Bordo (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
Yandall, David, 1997. “What Descartes Really Told Elisabeth: Mind-Body Union as a Primitive Notion,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, (5): 249–73.

Margaret Cavendish (1623–1673)

Books

Cavendish, Margaret, 1653. Philosophical Fancies. London: Printed by Tho. Roycroft for J. Martin and J. Allestrye.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1655. Philosophical and Physical Opinions. London: Printed for J. Martin and J. Allestrye at the Bell in St. Pauls Church-Yard.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1655. The World’s Olio. London: Printed for J. Martin and J. Allestrye.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1662. Orations of Divers Sorts, Accommodated to Divers Places. London: Printed by William Wilson.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1664. CCXI Sociable Letters. London: Printed by William Wilson.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1664. Philosophical Letters. London.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1666. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. To Which is Added, the Description of a New Blazing World. London: Printed by A. Maxwell.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1668. Grounds of Natural Philosophy. London: Printed by A. Maxwell.
Cavendish, Margaret, 1992. Description of a new world, called the Blazing World, and other writings, Kate Lilley (ed.), New York: NYU Press.
Cavendish, Margaret, 2000. Paper Bodies, A Margaret Cavendish Reader, Sylvia Bowerblank and Sara Mendelson (eds.), Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
Cavendish, Margaret, 2001. Observations on the Experimental Philosophy, Eileen O’Neill (ed.), New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Battigelli, Anna, 1998. Margaret Cavendish and The Exiles of the Mind, Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
Cottegnies, Line, and Nancy Weitz (eds.), 2003. Authorial Conquests: Essays on Genre in the Writings of Margaret Cavendish, Fairleigh Dickinson.
Clucas, Stephen (ed.), 2003. A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, Hampshire (England) and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
James, Susan (ed.), Margaret Cavendish: Political Writings, Cambridge University Press.
Rees, Emma LE, 2003. Margaret Cavendish, Manchester University Press.
Sarasohn, Lisa T, 2010. The Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and Fancy During the Scientific Revolution, Vol 2 , John Hopkins University Press.
Walters, Lisa. 2014. Margaret Cavendish: Gender, Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitaker, Katie, 2002. Mad Madge: The Extraordinary Life of Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, the First Woman to Live by Her Pen, New York: Basic Books.

Articles

Bonin, Erin Lang, 2000. “Margaret Cavendish’s Dramatic Utopias and the Politics of Gender,” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 40(2): 339–354.
Boyle, Deborah, 2006. “Fame, Virtue, and Government: Margaret Cavendish on Ethics and Politics,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(2): 251–289.
Boyle, Deborah, 2013. “Margaret Cavendish,” Philosophers’ Magazine, 60 (1):63–65.
Boyle, Deborah, 2013. “Margaret Cavendish on Gender, Nature, and Freedom,” Hypatia, 28(3):516–532.
Broad, Jacqueline, 2007. “Margaret Cavendish and Joseph Glanvill: Science, Religion and Witchcraft,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 38: 493–505.
Broad, Jacqueline, 2011. “Is Margaret Cavendish Worthy of Study Today?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42(3):457–461.
Clucas, Stephen, 1994. “The Atomism of the Cavendish Circle: A Reappraisal,” The Seventeenth Century, 9: 247–273.
Clucas, Stephen, 2000. “The Duchess and Viscountess: Negotiations between Mechanism and Vitalism in the Natural Philosophies of Margaret Cavendish and Anne Conway,” In-Between: Essays and Studies in Literary Criticism, 9(1): 125–36. [also listed under Anne Conway]
Clucas, Stephen, 2003. “Variation, Irregularity and Probabilism: Margaret Cavendish and Natural Philosophy as Rhetoric,” in A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, Stephen Clucas (ed.), Hampshire (England) and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 199–209.
Detlefsen, Karen, 2006. “Atomism, Monism, and Causation in the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish,” in Daniel Garber and Steven Nadler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 3: 199–240.
Detlefsen, Karen, 2007. “Reason and Freedom: Margaret Cavendish on the Order and Disorder of Nature,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 89: 157–81.
Detlefsen, Karen, 2009. “Margaret Cavendish on the Relation between God and World,” Philosophy Compass, 4(3): 421–438.
Duncan, Stewart, 2012. “Debating Materialism: Cavendish, Hobbes, and More,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 29(4):391–409.
Gregoriou, Zelia, 2013. “Pedagogy and Passages: The Performativity of Margaret Cavendish’s Utopian Fiction,” Journal of Philosophy of Education.
Hutton, Sarah, 1996. “In Dialogue with Thomas Hobbes: Margaret Cavendish’s Natural Philosophy,” Women’s Writing, 4: 421–32.
Hutton, Sarah, 1997. “Anne Conway, Margaret Cavendish and Seventeenth-Century Scientific Thought,” in Women, Science, and Medicine 1500–1700, L. Hunter and S. Hutton (eds.), Stroud/Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing. [Also listed under Anne Conway].
Hutton, Sarah, 2003. “Science and Satire: the Lucianic Voice of Margaret Cavendish’s Description of a New World Called the Blazing World,” in Authorial Conquests: Essays on Genre in the Writings of Margaret Cavendish, Line Cottegnies and Nancy Weitz (eds.), Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press; London: Associated University Presses.
Ingram, Randall, 2000. “First Words and Second Thoughts: Margaret Cavendish, Humphrey Moseley, and ‘the Book’,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 30(1): 101–124.
James, Susan, 1999. “The Philosophical Innovations of Margaret Cavendish,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(2):219–244.
Lewis, Eric, 2001. “The Legacy of Margaret Cavendish,” Perspectives on Science, 9(3): 341–365.
Michaelian, Kourken, 2009. “Margaret Cavendish’s Epistemology,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(1): 31–53.
Nate, Richard, 2001. “’Plain and Vulgarly Express’d’: Margaret Cavendish and the Discourse of the New Science,” Rhetorica, 19(4): 403–417.
O’Neill, Eileen, 2001. “Introduction.” in Margaret Cavendish: Observations upon Experimental Philosophy, Eileen O’Neill (ed.), Cambridge/NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sarasohn, Lisa T, 1984. “A Science Turned Upside Down: Feminism and the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 47: 299–307.
Smith, Hilda, 1997. “’A general war amongst the men’: Political differences between Margaret and William Cavendish,” in Politics and the Political Imagination in Later Stuart Britain: Essays presented to Lois Schwoerer, Howard Nenner (ed.), Rochester, NY.
Starr, G. Gabrielle, 2006. “Cavendish, Aesthetics, and the Anti-Platonic Line,” Eighteenth-century Studies, 39(3): 295–308.

Jane Lead[e] (1624–1704)

Juster, Susan, 2006. Doomsayers: Anglo-American Prophecy in the Age of Revolution, University of Pennsylvania Press. [See especially Chapter 3: Body and Soul: The Epistemology of Revelation.]
Lead, Jane, 1981 [1683]. The Revelation of Revelations, Edinburgh: Magnum Opus Hermetic Sourceworks.
Lead, Jane, 2010 [1696]. The Fountain of Gardens, Kessinger Publishing.
Hirst, Julie, 2005. Jane Leade: Biography of a Seventeenth-century Mystic, Ashgate Publishing.

Jacqueline Pascal (1625–1661)

Books

Arnauld, Antoine and Felix Cadet, 1898. Port-Royal education: Saint Cyran; Arnauld; Lancelot; Nicóle; De Saci; Guyot; Coustel; Fontaine; Jacqueline Pascal, New York: Scribener’s.
Pascal, Jacqueline, 1854. Jacqueline Pascal; or, Convent life at Port Royal, H.N. (ed.), London: J Nisbit.
Pascal, Jacqueline, 2007. A rule for children and other writings, University of Chicago Press.
Pascal, Blaise et al., 1964–1991. Oeuvres complètes avec tous les documents biographiques et critiques, les Oeuvres d’Étienne, de Gilberte et de Jacqueline Pascal et celles de Marguerite Périer, 4 vols. Menard, Jean (ed.). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
Aries, Philippe, 1978. “Centuries of Childhood,” in Toward a New Sociology of Education, John Beck (ed.), Transaction Books.
Delforge, Frédéric, 1985. Les petites écoles de Port-Royal. Paris: Cerf.
Delforge, Frédéric, 2002. Jacqueline Pascal (1625–1661). Paris: Éditions Nolin.
Lauenberger, Robert, 2002. Jacqueline Pascal: die Schwester des Philosophen. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag.
Pouzet, Régine, 2001. Chronique des Pascal: “Les Affaires du Monde” d’Étienne Pascal à Marguerite Périer (1588–1733). Paris: Champion.
Weitzel, Sophie Winthrop, 1880. Sister and Saint: A Sketch of the Life of Jacqueline Pascal, No. 3733, ADF Randolph.
Woodgate, Mildred Violet, 1944. Jacqueline Pascal and her brother, Browne and Nolan limited.

Queen Christina of Sweden (1626–1689)

Christina of Sweden, 2010 (reprint of London 1753 translation). The Works of Christina, Queen of Sweden, Containing maxims and sentences, in twelve centuries: and reflections on the actions of Alexander the Great; first translation from the French, Farmington Hills, MI: Gale ECCO.
Akerman, Susanna, 1991. Queen Christina of Sweden and her circle: The transformation of a seventeenth-Century philosophical libertine, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Ackerman, Susanna, 1991. “Kristina Wasa, Queen of Sweden,” in A History of Women Philosophers, Vol. 3, Mary Ellen Waithe (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer: 21–40.
Buckley, Veronica, 2011. Christina Queen of Sweden: The Restless Life of a European Eccentric, UK: HarperCollins.
Rodén, Marie-Louise, 2000. Church Politics in Seventeenth-century Rome: Cardinal Decio Azzolino, Queen Christina of Sweden and the Squadrone Volante, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wichsell.
Rodén, Marie-Louise, 1998. Queen Christina, Stockholm: Swedish Institute.

Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, marquise de Sévigné (1626–1696)

Sévigné, Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, marquise de, 1972–1978. Correspondance, 2 vols., Roger Duchêne (ed.), Paris: Gallimard.
Sévigné, Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, marquise de, 1982. Selected Letters, Leonard Tancock, (ed & transl.), London: Penguin Books.
Duchêne, Roger, 1996. Naissances d’un écrivain: Madame de Sévigné, Paris: Fayard.
Lyons, John D., 2011. “The Marquise de Sévigné: Philosophe,” in Teaching Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Women Writers, Faith Beasely (ed.), NY: Modern Language Association of America, 178–187.

Sophie of Hannover (1630–1714) and Sophie Charlotte (1668–1705)

Books

Leibniz, G.W. and Sophie of Hanover, 1874. Correspondance de Leibniz avec la princesse électrice Sophie de Brunswick-Lunebourg, Onno Klopp (ed.), Hanover: Klindworth.
Leibniz, G.W. and Sophie of Hanover, 2011. Leibniz and the Two Sophies: The Philosophical Correspondence, Lloyd Strickland (ed. & transl.), Toronto: Iter.
Sophie of Hanover, 1990. Mémoires et lettres de voyage, Dirk Van der Cruysse (ed. and introduction), Paris: Fayard.
Careil, Foucher de, 1876. Leibniz et les deux Sophies, Paris: Germer-Baillière.
Duggan, J.N., 2010. Sophia of Hanover, From Winter Princess to Heiress of Great Britain, London: Peter Owen.
Van der Cruysse, Dirk, 1990. Sophie de Hanovre, Memoires et Lettres de Voyage, Paris: Fayard.

Articles

Leduc, Christian, 2021. “Sophie of Hanover on the Soul-Body Relationship,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11 – 28.
Strickland, Lloyd, 2009. “The Philosophy of Sophie, Electress of Hanover,” Hypatia 24 (2): 186–204.

Anne Conway (1631–1679)

Books

Conway, Anne, 1690. “Principia Philosophiae Antiquissimæ & Recentissimæ de Deo, Christo & Creatura, id est de Spiritu & Materia in Genere,” in Opuscula Philosophica Quibus Continentur Principia Philosophiæ Antiquissimæ & Recentissimæ ac Philosophia Vulgaris Refutata Quibus Subjuncta Sunt CC. Problemata de Revolutione Animarum Humanarum, Amsterdam: Prostant Amstelodami, 1–144.
Conway, Anne, 1692. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, ‘J.C.’ Medicinae Professor (transl.), printed in Latin at Amsterdam by M. Brown, 1690, reprinted at London, 1692.
Conway, Anne Finch, 1996. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Allison Coudert and Taylor Corse (eds.), Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, Sarah, 2004. Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nicolson, Marjorie Hope and Hutton, Sarah (eds.), 1992. The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their Friends, 1642–1684. Clarendon Press.
Spalding-Andréolle, Donna and Véronique Molinari (eds.), 2011. Women and Science, 17th Century to Present: Pioneers, Activists and Protagonists, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. [Chapter 2 is on d’Arconville, chapter 1 is on Margaret Cavendish and Anne Conway]
White, Carol W, 2008. The Legacy of Anne Conway (1631–1679): Reverberations from a Mystical Naturalism, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Articles

Benfey, Theodor, 1986. “Anne Conway’s Interaction with Science, Politics, Medicine and Quakerism,” Guilford Review 23: 14–23.
Clucas, Stephen, 2000. “The Duchess and Viscountess: Negotiations between Mechanism and Vitalism in the Natural Philosophies of Margaret Cavendish and Anne Conway,” In-Between: Essays and Studies in Literary Criticism, 9(1): 125–36. [Also listed under Margaret Cavendish].
Coudert, Allison and Taylor Corse, 1996. “Introduction,” in The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, by Anne Conway, A. Coudert and T. Corse (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derksen, Louise D, 1998. “Anne Conway’s Critique of Cartesian Dualism,” Paper presented at the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, Massachusetts, August 10–15.
Duran, Jane, 1989. “Anne Viscountess Conway: A Seventeenth Century Rationalist.” Hypatia, 4(1): 64–79.
Frankel, Lois, 1995. “Anne Finch, Viscountess Conway,” in A History of Women Philosophers: Modern Women Philosophers, vol. 3, 1600–1900, M. E. Waithe (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 41–58.
Gabbey, Alan, 1977. “Anne Conway et Henry More: Lettres sur Descartes (1650–1651),” Archives de Philosophie (40): 379–404.
Hutton, Sarah, 1997. “Anne Conway, Margaret Cavendish and Seventeenth-Century Scientific Thought,” in Women, Science, and Medicine 1500–1700, L. Hunter and S. Hutton (ed.), Stroud/Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing. [also listed under Margaret Cavendish]
Hutton, Sarah, 2005. “Women Philosophers and the Early Reception of Descartes: Anne Conway and Princess Elisabeth,” in Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe, Tad M. Schmaltz (ed.), London: Routledge.
Lascano, Marcy P, 2013. “Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World,” Philosophy Compass, 8(4): 327–336.
Loptson, Peter, 1995. “Anne Conway, Henry More and their World,” Dialogue, 34(1): 139–146.
Martensen, Robert, 2008. “A Philosopher and her Headaches: The Tribulations of Anne Conway,” Philosophical Forum, 39(3): 315–326.
McRobert, Jennifer, 2000. “Anne Conway’s Vitalism and Her Critique of Descartes,” International Philosophical Quarterly, 40(1): 21–35.
Mercer, Christia, 2012. “Knowledge and Suffering in Early Modern Philosophy: G.W. Leibniz and Anne Conway,” in Emotional Minds, Sabrina Ebbersmeyer (ed.), De Gruyter.
Merchant, Carolyn, 1979. “The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz’s Concepts of the Monad,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 17: 255–269.
Popkin, Richard H, 1990. “The Spiritualist Cosmologies of Henry More and Anne Conway,” in Henry More (1614–1687): Tercentenary Studies, S. Hutton (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 98–113.

Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677)

Dale, Catherine Mary, 1999. “A Queer Supplement: Reading Spinoza after Grosz,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(1): 1–22.
Gatens, Moira, 1998. “Modern Rationalism,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Gatens, Moira, 2000. “Feminism as Password: Rethinking the Possible with Spinoza and Deleuze,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(2): 59–75.
James, Susan, 2000. “The Power of Spinoza: Feminist Conjunctions,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(2): 40–58.
Rorty, Amelie Oksenberg, 2002. “Spinoza on the Pathos of Idolatrous Love and the Hilarity of True Love,” in Feminism and History of Philosophy, Genevieve Lloyd (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 204–224.
Yeomans, Chris, 2003. “Spinoza, Feminism, and Domestic Violence,” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 52: 57–74.

Gabrielle Suchon (1632–1703)

Suchon, Gabrielle, Stanton, Domna C., and Wilkin, Rebecca May, 2010. A Woman who Defends All the Persons of Her Sex: Selected Philosophical and Moral Writings, University of Chicago Press.
Desnain, Veronique, 2006. “Gabrielle Suchon’s Neutralistes,” in Relations and Relationships in Seventeenth-Century French Literature, Jennifer Robin Perlmutter (ed.), Vol. 36, Gunter Narr Verlag.
Desnain, Veronique, 2009. “The Origins of la vie neutre: Nicolas Caussin’s Influence on the Writings of Gabrielle Suchon,” French studies, 63(2), 148–160.
Le Doeuff, Michèle & Deutscher, Penelope, 2000. “Feminism Is Back in France: Or Is It?” Hypatia, 15(4): 243–255.
Schutte, A. J, 2010. “Gabrielle Suchon’s Leaving the Convent,” Australian Journal of French Studies, 47(3): 304–306.

John Locke (1632–1704)

Books

Locke, John (1996/1693 and 1706). Some Thoughts Concerning Education and On the Conduct of the Understanding, Ruth Grant and Nathan Tarcov (eds.), Indianapolis: Hackett.
Beer, E. S., 1976. The Correspondence of John Locke, vol II – VI (of VIII), Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Excellent source for multiple correspondences with Lady Masham. Many correspondences with Lady Calverly, Martha Lockhard, Elisabeth Yonge, Martha Lockhart, Elizabeth Stratton, Elizabeth Berkeley (Burnet).]
Hirschmann, Nancy J., and Kirstie M. McClure, (2007). Feminist Interpretations of John Locke, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Articles

Butler, Melissa, 1978. “Early Political Roots of Feminism: John Locke and the Attack on Patriarchy,” American Political Science Review, 72. Reprinted in Nancy Tuana and Rosmarie Putnam Tong (eds.), 1995. Feminism and Philosophy: Essential Readings in Theory, Reinterpretation, and Application, Boulder: Westview Press.
Clark, Lorenne, 1979. “Women and Locke: Who Owns the Apples in the Garden of Eden?” in The Sexism of Social and Political Theory, L. Clark and L. Lange (eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
O’Donnell, Sheryl (1978). “Mr. Locke and the Ladies: the Indelible Words on the Tabula Rasa,” Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture (8): 151–64.
Simons, Martin, 1990. “Why Can’t a Man Be More Like a Woman? (A Note on John Locke’s Educational Thought),” Educational Theory, 40(1): 135–145.
Whyman, Susan, John Locke, and Esther Masham, 2003. “The Correspondence of Esther Masham and John Locke: A Study in Epistolary Silences,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 66(3/4), Studies in the Cultural History of Letter Writing: 275–305.

Françoise d’Aubigné, marquise de Maintenon (1635–1719)

Maintenon, Françoise d’Aubigné, marquise de, 1998. Comment la sagesse vient aux filles. Pierre-E. Leroy and Marcel Loyau (eds.), Entrepilly: Batrillat.
Maintenon, Françoise d’Aubigné, marquise de, 2004. Dialogues and Addresses. John J. Conley, (ed. & transl.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maintenon, Madame de, 2007. Dialogues and Addresses, John J. Conley (ed. and trans.), University of Chicago Press.
Castelot, André 1996. Madame de Maintenon: La reine secrète, Paris: Perrin.
Daniélou, Madeleine 1946. Madame de Maintenon, éducatrice, Paris: Bloud & Gay.
Gregoriou, Zelia, 1999. “Letter Writing and the Performativity of Intimacy in Female Pedagogical Relations: Recuperating Derridean Amnesia, Writing Back to Madame de Maintenon,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18(5): 351–363.
Leonard, John, 1947. “Madame de Maintenon and Saint-Cyr,” Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, 36(144): 421–430.
Nyabongo, Virginia Simmons, 1949. “Madame de Maintenon and Her Contribution to Education,” The French Review, 22(3): 241–248.

Aphra Behn (1640–1689)

Books

Behn, Aphra, 2009. Oroonoko and Other Writings, Oxford University Press.
Hughes, Derek, and Janet Todd (eds.), 2004. The Cambridge Companion to Aphra Behn, Cambridge University Press.
Hutner, Heidi (ed.), 1993. Rereading Aphra Behn: History, Theory, and Criticism, University of Virginia Press.
Kreis-Schinck, Annette, 2001. Women, Writing, and the Theater in the Early Modern Period: The Plays of Aphra Behn and Susanne [ie Susanna] Centlivre, Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.
O’Donnell, Mary Ann, 2004. Aphra Behn: an annotated bibliography of primary and secondary sources, Ashgate Publishing.
Spender, D., 1982. Women of Ideas and What Men Have Done to Them: From Aphra Behn to Adrienne Rich, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wallace, David, 2008. Premodern Places: Calais to Surinam, Chaucer to Aphra Behn, John Wiley & Sons.

Articles

Dickson, Vernon Guy, 2007. “Truth, Wonder, and Exemplarity in Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko,” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 47(3): 573–594.
Finger, Stanley, 2012. “The Lady and the Eel: how Aphra Behn introduced Europeans to the ‘numb eel’,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 55(3): 378–401.
Harol, Corrinne, 2012. “The Passion of Oroonoko: Passive Obedience, The Royal Slave, and Aphra Behn’s Baroque Realism,” ELH, 79(2): 447–475.
Hughes, Derek, 2002. “Race, Gender, and Scholarly Practice: Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko,” Essays in Criticism, 52(1): 1–22.
Molineux, Catherine, 2013. “False Gifts/Exotic Fictions: Epistemologies of Sovereignty and Assent in Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko,” ELH, 80(2): 455–488.
Orr, Leah, 2013. “Attribution Problems in the Fiction of Aphra Behn,” Modern Language Review, 108(1): 30–51.
Pearson, Jacqueline, 1991. “Gender and Narrative in the Fiction of Aphra Behn,” The Review of English Studies, 42(165): 40–56.

Marguerite Hessein, Madame de Sablière (1640–1693)

Sablière, Marguerite Hessein, Madame de 1923. Maximes Chrétiennes, Pensées Chrétiennes, and Lettres in Madame de la Sablière. D’Elbenne, Menjot (ed.). Paris: Plon.
Ganim, Russell, 1996. “Scientific Verses: Subversion of Cartesian Theory and Practice in the ‘Discours à Madame de la Sablière’,” in Refiguring La Fontaine: Tercentenary Essays, Anne Birberick (ed.), Charlottesville, VA: Rookwood, 101–125.
Menjot d’Elbenne, Samuel, vicomte. Madame de la Sablière; Ses Pensées Chrètiennes et ses Lettres à l’Abbé de Rancé, Paris: Plon, 1923.
Ogilvie-Bailey, Marilyn, 1986. “La Sablière, Marguerite Hessein de la,” in Women in Science: Antiquity through the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge: MIT Press, 118–119.
Wall, Glenda 2013. “Marguerite Hessein de la Sablière,” in Women Writers of Great Britain and France, Wilson, Katharina M. (ed.), London: Routledge, 401–402.

G.W. Leibniz (1646–1716)

Brown, Gregory, 2004. “Leibniz’s Endgame and the Ladies of the Courts,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 65(1): 75–100.
Brown, Gregory, 2004. “Personal, Political, and Philosophical Dimensions of the Leibniz-Caroline Correspondence,” in Leibniz and His Correspondents, Paul Lodge (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Fara, Patricia, 2004. “Leibniz’s women,” Endeavour, 28(4): 146–148. [Sophie, Sophie Charlotte, and Caroline.]
Gatens, Moira, 1998. “Modern Rationalism,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Meli, Bertoloni D, 1999. “Caroline, Liebniz, and Clarke,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60(3): 469–486, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Anne Le Fèvre Dacier (1647–1720)

Dacier, Anne Le Fèvre, 1714. Des causes de la corruption du goût. Paris: Rigaud.
Dacier, Anne Le Fèvre, 1716. Homère défendu contre l’apologie du Père Hardouin. Paris: Coignard.
Bury, Emmanuel, 1999. “Madame Dacier,” in Femmes savantes, savorrs de femmes: Du crépuscule de la Renaissance à l’aube des Lumières, Colette Navitel (ed.), Geneva: Droz, 209–220.
Hayes, Julie Candler, 2002. “Of Meaning and Modernity: Anne Dacier and the Homer Debate,” in Strategic Rewriting, David Lee Rubin (ed.), Charlottesville, VA: Rookwood, 173–95.
Krück, Marie-Pierre, 2009. Poétique de la corruption chez Anne Dacier, Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Morton, Richard Everett, 2003. Examining Changes in the Eighteenth-Century French Translations of Homer’s “Iliad” by Anne Dacier and Houdar de la Motte, E. Mellen Press.

François Poulain de la Barre (1647–1723)

Poulain de la Barre, François, 1676. De l’égalité des deux sexes, discours physique et moral où l’on voit l’importance de se défaire des préjugez, Paris: Jean Dupuis.
Poulain de la Barre, François, 2002. Three Cartesian Feminist Treatises, Vivien Bosley (trans.), University of Chicago Press.
Clarke, Desmond M., 2013. The Equality of the Sexes: Three Feminist Texts of the Seventeenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Includes de Gournay, van Schurman, and Franҫoise Poulain de la Barre.]
Seidel, Michael A., 1974. “Poullain de la Barre’s ‘The Woman as Good as the Man’,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 35: 499–508.

Anne Therése, marquise de Lambert (1647–1733)

Marquise de Anne Thérèse de Marguenat de Courcelles Lambert, 2014. Essays on Friendship and Old Age, HardPress Publishing.
Marquise de Anne Thérèse de Marguenat de Courcelles Lambert, 1737. The Philosophy of Love: or, New Reflexions on the Fair Sex, John Lockman (ed.), London: J Hawkins.
Marquise de Anne Thérèse de Marguenat de Courcelles Lambert, 1769. The Works of the Marchioness de Lambert, trans. anon. London: W. Owen.
Marquise de Anne Thérèse de Marguenat de Courcelles Lambert, 1790. The Fair Solitary, or Female Hermit, trans. anon. Philadelphia: (printed and sold by) William Spotswood.
Marquise de Anne Thérèse de Marguenat de Courcelles Lambert, 1995. New Reflections on Women: A New Translation and Introduction, Ellen McNiven Hine (ed.), New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Beasely, Faith, 1992. “Anne-Thérèse de Lambert and the Politics of Taste,” Papers on French Seventeenth Century Literature, 19(37): 337–44.
Hayes, Julie Candler, 2010. “Friendship and the Female Moralist,” Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture, 39(1): 171–189.
Hine, Ellen McNiven, 1973. Madame de Lambert, her Sources and her Circle, Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation.

Sor Juana de la Cruz (1648–1695)

Books

Flynn, Gerard C, 1971. Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, New York: Twayne.
Merrim, Stephanie (ed.), 1991. Feminist Perspectives on Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Montross, Constance M, 1981. Virtue or Vice? Sor Juana’s Use of Thomistic Thought, Washington DC: University Press of America.
Paz, Octavio, 1988. Sor Juana or, The Traps of Faith, Margaret Sayers Peden (trans.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tavard, George H, 1991. Juana Inés de la Cruz and the Theology of Beauty: The First Mexican Theology, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

Articles

Arenal, Electa, 1999. “Where Woman is Creator of the World; or Sor Juana’s Discourses on Method,” in Feminist Perspectives on Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Stephanie Merrim (ed.) Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Cortés-Vélez, Dinorah, 2010. “Marian Devotion and Religious Paradox in Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz,” Renascence, 62(3): 179–200.
Ludmer, Josefina, 1991. “The Tricks of the Weak,” in Feminist Perspectives on Sor Juana, Stephanie Merrim (ed.) Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Mitsuda, Masato, 2002. “Chuang Tzu and sor Juana Ines de la Cruz: Eyes to Think, Ears to See,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 29(1): 119–133.
Morkovsky, Mary Christine, CDP, 1991. “Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz,” in A History of Women Philosophers, Mary Ellen Waithe (ed.), 4 vols, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scott, Nina, 1985. “Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz: ‘Let your Women Keep Silence in the Churches’,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 8(5): 511–19.
Scott, Nina, 1988. “ ‘If you are not pleased to favor me, put me out of your mind’: Gender and Authority in Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz; and the Translation of Her Letter to the Reverend Father Maestro Antonio Núñez of the Society of Jesus,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(5): 429–38.

Jeanne-Marie Guyon (1648–1717)

Guennin-Lelle, Dianne and Ronney Mourad, 2012. Jeanne Guyon: Selected Writings (Classics of Western Spirituality), Paulist Press.
Guyon, Jeanne-Marie Bouvier de la Motte, 2011. The Autobiography of Madam Guyon, Los Angeles, USA: Indo-European Publishing.
Guyon, Jeanne-Marie Bouvier de la Motte, 2011. The Complete Madame Guyon, Nancy C. James (ed.), Paraclete Press.
Guyon, Jeanne-Marie Bouvier de la Motte, 2013. Letters of Jeanne Guyon, Whitaker House.
Mourad, Ronney and Dianne Guennin-Lelle, 2011. The Prison Narratives of Jeanne Guyon, USA: Oxford University Press.

Damaris Cudworth Masham, Lady Masham (1659–1708)

Letters

Masham, Damaris Cudworth, n.d. Two letters to Shaftesbury, Public Record Office, London, MS 30/24/20 [part II], no. 106, ff. 266–7; and MS 30/24/20 [part II], no. 109, ff. 273–4.
Masham, Damaris and Le Clerc, n.d. Correspondence, Amsterdam University Library (UVA), MS J.58v; MS J.57.b; MS J.57.a; MS. J.57.c.
Masham, Damaris and Limborch, n.d. Correspondence, Amsterdam University Library (UVA), MS III.D.16, f. 215v; MS M.31.a; MS III.D.16, f. 53; MS M.31.b; MS III.D.16, f. 54; MS M.31.c; MS III.D.16, f. 55v-56.

Books

Masham, Damaris Cudworth, 1696. A Discourse Concerning the Love of God, London. [published anonymously]
Masham, Damaris Cudworth Lady, 1705. Discours sur l’Amour Divin: où l’on Explique ce que c’est, & où l’on Fait Voir les Mauvaises Conséquences des Explications Trop Subtiles que l’on en Donne. Traduit de l’Anglois par Pierre Coste, Amsterdam: H. Schelte. [published anonymously]
Masham, Damaris Cudworth Lady, 1705. Occasional Thoughts in Reference to a Vertuous or Christian Life, London: Printed for A. and J. Churchil at the Black-Swan in Paternoster-Row. [published anonymously, 2^nd edn. 1747 wrongly attributed to John Locke]
Masham, Damaris Cudworth, 2005. Philosophical Works of Damaris, Lady Masham, J. Buickerood (ed.), London: Thoemmes Continuum.

Articles

Broad, Jacqueline, 2003. “Adversaries or Allies? Occasional Thoughts on the Masham-Astell Exchange,” Eighteenth-Century Thought, (1): 123–49.
Broad, Jacqueline, 2006. “A Woman’s Influence? John Locke and Damaris Masham on Moral Accountability,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(3): 489–510.
Broad, Jacqueline, 2019. “Damaris Masham on Women and Liberty of Conscience,” in Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, Eileen O’Neill and Marcy Lascano (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 319–336.
Buickerood, James G., 2005. “What Is it With Damaris, Lady Masham? The Historiography of One Early Modern Woman Philosopher,” Locke Studies: An Annual Journal of Locke Research, (5): 179–214.
Frankel, Lois, 1989. “Damaris Cudworth Masham: A Seventeenth Century Feminist Philosopher,” Hypatia, 4: 80–90.
Hutton, Sarah, 1993. “Damaris Cudworth, Lady Masham: Between Platonism and Enlightenment,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 1(1): 29–54.
Moore, Terence, 2013. “John Locke and Damaris Masham, Née Cudworth: Questions of Influence,” Think, 12(34): 97–108.
Myers, Joanne E., 2013. “Enthusiastic Improvement: Mary Astell and Damaris Masham on Sociability,” Hypatia, 28(3): 533–550.
O’Donnell, Sheryl, 1984. “’My Idea in Your Mind’: John Locke and Damaris Cudworth Masham,” in Mothering the Mind, Ruth Perry and Martine Watson Brownley (eds.), Holmes and Meier, 26–46.
Penaluna, Regan, 2007. “The Social and Political Thought of Damaris Cudworth Masham,” in Virtue, Liberty, and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women, 1400–1800, Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 111–22.
Phemister, Pauline, 2004. “The Principle of Uniformity in the Correspondence between Leibniz and Lady Masham,” in Leibniz and his Correspondence, Paul Lodge (ed.), Cambridge University Press [available online]
Ready, Kathryn, 2002. “Damaris Cudworth Masham, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, and the Feminist Legacy of Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 35(40): 563–576. [Also listed under Catharine Trotter Cockburn.]
Simonutti, Luisa, 1987. “Damaris Cudworth Masham: una Lady della Repubblica delle Lettere,” in Scritti in Onore di Eugenio Garin, Pisa: Scuola Normale Superioire, 141–65.
Weinberg, Sue, 1998. “Damaris Cudworth Masham: A Learned Lady of the Seventeenth Century,” in Norms and Values: Essays on the Work of Virginia Held, Joram Graf Haber and Mark S. Halfon (eds.), Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wilson, Catherine, 2004. “Love of God and Love of Creatures: The Masham-Astell Debate,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 21(3): 281–98.

Mary Astell (1666–1731)

Books

Astell, Mary, 1996. Astell: Political Writings, P. Springborg (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Astell, Mary, 2002. A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Parts I and II, P. Springborg (ed.), Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts.
Astell, Mary, 2008. Mary Astell et le féminisme en Angleterre au XVIIe siècle, Line Cottegnies (ed. & transl.), Lyon, France: ENS Éditions.
Broad, Jacqueline, 2015. The Philosophy of Mary Astell: An Early Modern Theory of Virtue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kolbrener, William and Michal Michelson (eds.), 2007. Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers. [Includes 13 essays on Astell.]
Perry, Ruth, 1990. The Celebrated Mary Astell, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sowaal, Alice, and Penny A. Weiss (eds.), 2016. Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Springborg, Patricia, 2005. Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom from Domination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sutherland, Christine, 2005. The Eloquence of Mary Astell, University of Calgary Press.

Articles

Apetrei, Sarah, 2008. “Call No Man Master Upon Earth: Mary Astell’s Tory Feminism and an Unknown Correspondence,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 41(4): 507–523.
Alvarez, David P., 2011. “Reason and Religious Tolerance: Mary Astell’s Critique of Shaftesbury,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 44(4): 475–494.
Broad, Jacqueline, 2003. “Adversaries or Allies? Occasional Thoughts on the Masham-Astell Exchange,” Eighteenth-Century Thought, 1: 123–49. [Also listed under Masham]
Broad, Jacqueline, 2009. “Mary Astell on Virtuous Friendship,” Parergon, 26(2): 65–86.
Bryson, Cynthia B., 1998. “Mary Astell: Defender of the ‘Disembodied Mind’,” Hypatia, 13(4): 40–62.
Choi, Julie, 2011. “Women, Religion, and Enlightenment: Mary Astell’s Serious Proposal to the Ladies,” Feminist Studies in English Literature, 19(1): 5.
Detlefsen, Karen, 2017. “Cartesianism and its Feminist Promise and Limits: The Case of Mary Astell,” in Mind and Nature in Descartes and Cartesianism, Catherine Wilson and Stephen Gaukroger (eds.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 191 – 206.
Duran, Jane, 2000. “Mary Astell: A Pre-Humean Christian Empiricist and Feminist,” in Presenting Women Philosophers, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 147 – 154.
Ellenzweig, Sarah, 2003. “The love of God and the radical enlightenment: Mary Astell’s brush with Spinoza,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(3): 379–397.
Green, Karen, 2012. “When is a Contract Theorist Not A Contract Theorist? Mary Astell and Catherine Macaulay as Critics of Thomas Hobbes,” in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, Nancy J.Hiaschmann and Joanne H. Wright (eds.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. pp 169–189. [Also listed under Catherine Macaulay]
Harris, Jocelyn, 2012. “Philosophy and Sexual Politics in Mary Astell and Samuel Richardson,” Intellectual History Review 22(3): 445–463.
Hartmann, Van C., 1998. “Tory Feminism in Mary Astell’s ‘Bart’lemy Fair’,” The Journal of Narrative Technique, 28(3): 243–265.
Johns, Alessa, 1996. “Mary Astell’s ‘Excited Needles’: Theorizing Feminist Utopia in Seventeenth-Century England,” Utopian Studies, 7(1): 60–74.
Kinnaird, Joan K., 1979. “Mary Astell and the Conservative Contribution to English Feminism,” The Journal of British Studies, 19(1): 53–75.
Kolbrener, William, 2003. “Gendering the Modern: Mary Astell’s Feminist Historiography,” The Eighteenth Century, 44(1): 1–24.
Leduc, Guyonne, 2011. “Mary Astell et le féminisme en Angleterre au XVIIe siècle,” Études anglaises, 64(3): 376.
Lister, Andrew, 2004. “Marriage and Misogyny: The Place of Mary Astell in the History of Political Thought,” History of Political Thought, 25(10): 44–72.
McCrystal, John, 1993. “Revolting Women: The Use of Revolutionary Discourse in Mary Astell and Mary Wollstonecraft Compared,” History of Political Thought, 14(2): 189–203.
Myers, Joanne E., 2013. “Enthusiastic Improvement: Mary Astell and Damaris Masham on Sociability,” Hypatia, 28(3): 533–550. [Also listed under Lady Masham]
Nelson, A., 2005. “The Rationalist Impulse,” in A Companion to Rationalism, A. Nelson (ed.), Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 3–11.
Sowaal, Alice, 2007. “Mary Astell’s Serious Proposal: Mind, Method, and Custom,” Philosophy Compass, 2(2): 227–43.
Taylor, E. Derek, 2001. “Mary Astell’s Ironic Assault on John Locke’s Theory of Thinking Matter,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 62(3): 505–522.
Weiss, Penny A., 2004. “Mary Astell: Including Women’s Voices in Political Theory,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(3): 63–84.
Wilson, Catherine, 2004.“Love of God and Love of Creatures: The Masham-Astell Debate,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 21(3): 281–98. [Also listed under Lady Masham]

Other Seventeenth Century Philosophy

Primary sources

[anon.] Gründ- und probierliche Beschreibung, Argument, und Schluß-Articul, sampt beygefügten außführlichen Beantwortungen: Belangend die Frag, Ob die Weiber Menschen seyn oder nicht? (1618).
Anna Sophia (Landgravine of Hessen-Darmstadt), 1658. Der treue Seelenfreund Christus Jesus, mit nachdenklichen Sinn-Gemählden, anmuhtigen Lehrgedichten und neuen geistreichen Gesangen, Dresden.
Bellin, Johann, 1650. Abigail, das ist, des löblichen Frauenzimmers Adel und Forträfligkeit, Lübeck.
Drake, Judith, 1970. An essay in defence of the female sex. In Letter to a Lady. Written by a Lady, London.
Frawenlob, Johann [pseudonym], 1631. Die Lobwürdige Gesellschaft der Gelehrten Weiber, Das ist: Kurze historische Beschreibung der fürnembsten gelehrten, verständigen und kunsterfahrnen Weibespersonen, die in der Welt biß auff diese Zeit gelebet haben.
Gorgias, Johann [pseudonym: Poliandin], 1666. Gestürtzter Ehren-Preiß des hochlöblichen Frauen-Zimmers, Oder Verthädiger Männliches Geschlechts, darinnen von Wort zu Wort die Erörterung ohne Fug in Zweiffel gezogenen Frage, Ob das Weibliche Geschlecht am Verstande dem Männlichen von Natur gleich, auch zu Verrichtung Tugendsamer Wercke und Thaten, ebenmässig qualificirt und geschickt sey?
Höltlich, Franz Heinrich, and Johann Caspar Waltz, 1672. Qu. Foemina non est homo, Wittenberg.
Juncker, Christian, 1692. Schediasma historicum, de Ephemeridibus sive Diariis Eruditorum in nobilioribus Europae partibus hactenus publicatis. In appendice exhibetur centuria foeminarum eruditione et scriptis illustrium, Leipzig.
Omeis, Magnus Daniel, 1688. Dissertatio de eruditis Germaniae mulieribus, Altdorf (translated in Archiv für philosophie- und theologiegeschichtliche Frauenforschung, Vol. 2: Eva—Gottes Meisterwerk, Elisabeth Gössmann ed., Munich: iudicium Verlag, 1985).
Sauerbrei, Johannes and Jakob Thomasius, 1671. Diatriben academicam de foeminarum eruditione, Leipzig (transl. in Archiv für philosophie- und theologiegeschichtliche Frauenforschung, Vol. 1: Das Wohlgelahrte Frauenzimmer, Elisabeth Gössmann ed., Munich: iudicium Verlag, 1984, 99–108).
Schilling-Ruckteschel, Rosina Dorothea, 1697. Das Weib auch ein wahrer Mensch gegen die unmenschlichen Lästerer Weibl. Geschlechts, einfältigst vorgestellt von einer Jungfräulichen Weibs-Person R.D.S. (reprinted in Archiv für philosophie- und theologiegeschichtliche Frauenforschung, Vol. 8: Weisheit – eine schöne Rose auf dem Dornenstrauche, Elisabeth Gössmann ed., Munich: iudicium Verlag, 2004, 321–440).
Schütz, Wilhelm Ignaz, 1663. Ehren-Preiß Deß hochlöblichen Frauen-Zimmers, das ist, Unpartheyische Erörterung der ohne Fug in Zweiffel gezogenen Frag: Ob nemlichen das Weibliche Geschlecht am Verstand dem Männlichen von Natur gleich, auch zu Verrichtung tugendsamer Werck und Thaten, ebenmässig qualificirt und geschickt sey?, Frankfurt.

Secondary sources

Green, Karen, 2009. “Madeleine de Scudéry on Love and the Emergence of the ‘Private Sphere’,” History of Political Thought, 30(2): 272–285.
Smith, Hannah, 2001. “English ‘Feminist’ Writings and Judith Drake’s ‘An Essay in Defense of the Female Sex’ (1696),” The Historical Journal, 44(3): 727–747.

Eighteenth Century Philosophy

General Eighteenth

Books

Boros, Gábor, Herman De Dijn, and Martin Moors (eds.), 2007. The concept of love in 17th and 18th century philosophy, Leuven University Press. [Includes a chapter on the Masam-Astell exchange. Also included in the 17th Century Philosophers Section.]
Conley, John J. 2002. The Suspicion of Virtue: Women Philosophers in Neoclassical France, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 124–156.
Dyck, Corey W. (ed.), 2021. Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Findlen, Paula et al. (eds.), 2009. Italy’s Eighteenth Century: Gender and Culture in the Age of the Grand Tour, Stanford University Press.
Godineau, D., 1998. The Women of Paris and Their French Revolution, Katherine Streip (trans.), Berkeley: University of California Press.
Green, Karen, 2014. A History of women’s political thought in Europe, 1700–1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Includes chapters on Mary Delariviere Manley, Mary Wortley Montagu, Eliza Haywood, Anne-Thérèse de Marguenat de Courcelles, Françoise de Graffigny, Octavie Belot, Madame de Staël, Catharine Macaulay, Helen Maria Williams. Other chapters are on groups of women.]
Heuer, J. N., 2005. The Family and the Nation: Gender and Citizenship in Revolutionary France, 1789–1830, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hull, Isabel, 1996. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Karremann, Isabel and Gideon Stiening (eds.), 2020. Feministische Aufklärung in Europa / The Feminist Enlightenment across Europe, Hamburg: Meiner.
Langer, Thurid (ed.), 1996. Über die Gelehrsamkeit eines Frauenzimmers: Texte von und über Frauenzimmer von Johanna Charlotte Unzerin, Johann Gottlob Krüger, Georg Friedrich Meier, Johann Joachim Lange, Halle: Hallescher Verlag.
Messbarger, Rebecca, 2002. The century of women: representations of women in eighteenth-century Italian public discourse, University of Toronto Press.
Messbarger, Rebecca Marie and Paula Findlen (eds.), 2005. The contest for knowledge: debates over women’s learning in eighteenth-century Italy, University of Chicago Press. [Includes primary text material for Maria Gaetana Agnesi, Giuseppa Eleonora Barbapiccola, Diamante Medaglia Faini, and Aretafila Savini de’ Rossi.]
O’Brien, Karen, 2009. Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Neill, Eileen (ed.), 1998. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Collection of Primary Sources, Oxford University Press.
Sotiropoulos, Carol Strauss, 2007. Early feminists and the education debates: England, France, Germany, 1760–1810, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. [Includes, among others, in chronological order: Sophie von La Roche, Catharine Macaulay, Mary Wollstonecraft, Amalia Holst, and Betty Gleim.]
Witt, Ulrike, 1996. Bekehrung, Bildung und Biographie. Frauen im Umkreis des Halleschen Pietismus, Halle: Niemeyer.

Articles

Bloch, M. and J. H. Bloch, 1980. “Women and the Dialectics of Nature in Eighteenth Century French Thought,” in Nature, Culture, and Gender, C. MacCormack and M. Strathern (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brennan, Theresa and Carole Pateman, 1968. “‘Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth’: Women and the Origins of Liberalism,” in Political Studies, XXVII(2).
Clinton, Katherine B., 1975. “Femme et Philosophe: Enlightenment Origins of Feminism,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 8 (3): 283–299.
Findlen, P., 1995. “Translating the new science: women and the circulation of knowledge in enlightenment Italy,” Configurations, 3(2): 167–206.
Giglioni, Guido, 2003. “Between Exclusion and Seclusion: The Precarious and Elusive Place of Women in Early-Modern Thought,” Configurations, 11(1): 111–122.
Naimark-Goldberg, Natalie, 2008. “Reading and Modernization: The Experience of Jewish Women in Berlin Around 1800,” Nashim 15: 58–87.
Offen, Karen, 1990. “The New Sexual Politics of French Revolutionary Historiography,” French Historical Studies, 16(4): 909–922.
O’Neill, Eileen, 2005. “Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy,” Hypatia, 20(3): 185–197. [overview that orients many of the women philosophers in a conceptual map.]
Petschauer, Peter, 1986. “Eighteenth-Century German Opinions about Education for Women,” Central European History 19 (3): 262–292.
Steinhaußen, Jan, 2008. “Geschlecteranthropologie und Erziehung der Töchter im Philanthropismus,” in ‘Die Stammmutter aller guten Schulen:’ Das Dessauer Philanthropinum und der deutsche Philanthropismus 1774–1793, Jörn Garber (ed.), Tübingen: Niemeyer, 179–208.
Tapper, Marion, 1986. “Can a Feminist Be a Liberal?” in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Supp. 64.

Bluestocking Women

[The Bluestockings were the group of women who visited Elisabeth Montagu’s salon.]

Books

Carter, Elizabeth, 2005. Elizabeth Carter, 1717–1806: An Edition of Some Unpublished Letters, University of Delaware Press.
Kelly, Jennifer (ed.), 1999. Bluestocking feminism: writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 1738–1785, Pickering & Chatto.
Montagu, Elizabeth, 2011. Elizabeth Montagu, the queen of the bluestockings: her correspondence from 1720 to 1761, Vols. 1 and 2, Emily J. Climenson (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Pennington, M., 1809. Memoirs of the Life of Mrs. Elizabeth Carter, OC Greenleaf.
Schellenberg, Betty A. (ed.), 2003. Reconsidering the Bluestockings, Huntington Library.

Articles

Brown, Hilary, 2002. “The Reception of the Bluestockings by Eighteenth-Century German Women Writers,” Women in German Yearbook, 18: 111–132.
Chapone, Hester, 2010. Letters on the Improvement of the Mind, Addressed to a Lady, Kessinger Publishing.
Guest, Harriet, 2002. “Bluestocking feminism,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 65(1/2): 59–80.
Hutton, Sarah, 2007. “Virtue, God and Stoicism in the thought of Elizabeth Carter and Catharine Macaulay,” in Virtue, Liberty and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women 1400–1800, Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer.
Wallace, Jennifer, 2003. “Confined and Exposed: Elizabeth Carter’s Classical Translations,” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 22(2): 315–334.

Catharine Trotter Cockburn (1679–1749)

Books

Kelley, Anne, 2002. Catharine Trotter: an Early Modern Writer in the Vanguard of Feminism, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sheridan, P., 2006. Catharine Trotter Cockburn: Philosophical Writings, Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Editions.

Articles

Backscheider, Paula R, 1995. “Stretching the Form: Catharine Trotter Cockburn and Other Failures,” Theatre Journal, 47(4): 443–458.
Bolton, Martha Brandt, 1996. “Some Aspects of the Philosophical Work of Catharine Trotter Cockburn,” in Hypatia’s Daughters: Fifteen Hundred Years of Women Philosophers, Linda Lopez McAlister (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 139–164.
Duran, Jane, 2013. “Early English Empiricism and the Work of Catharine Trotter Cockburn,” Metaphilosophy, 44(4): 485–495.
Ready, Kathryn, 2002. “Damaris Cudworth Masham, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, and the feminist legacy of Locke's theory of personal identity,” Eighteenth-century studies, 35(4): 563–576.
Sheridan, Patricia, 2007. “Reflection, Nature, and Moral Law: The extent of Catharine Trotter Cockburn’s Lockeanism in her Defence of Mr. Locke’s Essay,” Hypatia, 22(3): 133–151.
Thomas, Emily 2013. “Catharine Cockburn on Substantival Space,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30(30): 195–214.
Waithe, Mary Ellen, 1991. “Catharine Trotter Cockburn,” in A History of Women Philosophers, Springer Netherlands, 101–125.

Giuseppa-EleonoraBarbapiccola (1702–1740)

Messbarger, Rebecca Marie and Paula Findlen (eds.), 2005. The Contest for Knowledge: Debates over Women’s Learning in Eighteenth-Century Italy, University of Chicago Press. [see Chapter 1 and translator’s introduction to Chapter 1.]
Findlen, P., 1995. “Translating the new science: women and the circulation of knowledge in enlightenment Italy,” Configurations, 3(2): 167–206. [Includes discussion of Barbapiccola’s Italian translation of Descartes’ Principles.]
Giglioni, Guido, 2003. “Between Exclusion and Seclusion: The Precarious and Elusive Place of Women in Early-Modern Thought,” Configurations, 11(1): 111–122. [Barbapiccola is mentioned only briefly.]

Emilie du Châtelet (1706–1749)

Primary sources

Châtelet, Émilie du, 1738. “Lettre sur les Eléments de la Philosophie de Newton,” Journal des Sçavans, 534–541.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 1738. “Reply to the Voltairomanie,” in Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, Vol. 89, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1969: D. app. 51, 508–12.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 1739. “Dissertation sur la Nature et la Propagation du Feu,” in Recueil des Pièces qui ont Remporté le Prix de l’Académie Royale des Sciences en 1738, Académie Royale des Sciences (ed.), Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 85–168.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 1740. Institutions de physique, Paris: Prault fils.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 1741. Réponse de Madame la Marquise du Chastellet à la Lettre que M. de Mairan, Secrétaire Perpétuel de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, lui a Écrite le 18 Février 1741 sur la Question des Forces Vives, Bruxelles: Foppens.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 1747. “Mémoire Touchant les Forces Vives Adresseè en Forme de Lettre à M. Jurin par Madame Ureteüil Du Chastellet,” in Memorie Sopra la Fisica e Istoria Naturale di Diversi Valentuomini, Carlantonio Giuliani (ed.), Lucca: Benedini, Vol. 3, pp. 75–84.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 1779. “Discours sur le Bonheur,” in Huitième Recueil philosophique et littéraire de la Société Typographique de Bouillon, Vol. 8, Bouillon: Société Typographique de Bouillon, 1–78.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 1792. Doutes sur les Religions Révélées Adressées à Voltaire, par Émilie Du Châtelet: Ouvrage Posthume, Paris.
Châtelet, Émilie du, 2009. Selected Philosophical and Scientific Writings, Judith P. Zinsser (ed.), Isabelle Bour and Judith P. Zinsser (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Secondary sources

Allen, Lydia D., 1998. Physics, frivolity, and “Madame Pompon-Newton”: the Historical Reception of the Marquise du Châtelet from 1750–1966, University of Cincinnati: PhD dissertation.
Barber, William H, 1967. “Mme du Châtelet and Leibnizianism: the genesis of the Institutions de physique,” in The Age of Enlightenment: Studies Presented to Theodore Besterman, W.H. Barber et al. (eds.), Edinburgh: University Court of the University of St. Andrews, 200–22.
Brading, Katherine, 2019. Émilie Du Châtelet and the Foundations of Physical Science, London: Routledge.
Detlefsen, Karen, 2013. “Emilie du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21(1): 207–209.
Detlefsen, Karen, 2019. “Du Châtelet and Descartes on the Role of Hypothesis and Metaphysics in Science,” in Feminist History of Philosophy: the recovery and evaluation of women’s philosophical thought, Eileen O’Neill and Marcy Lascano (eds.), Berlin: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 97–128.
Ehrman, Esther, 1986. Mme Du Châtelet: Scientist, Philosopher and Feminist of the Enlightenment, Leamington Spa: Berg.
Fara, Patricia, 2004. “Emilie du Châtelet: the Genius without a Beard,” Physics world, 17(6): 14–15.
Gessell, Bryce, 2019. “‘Mon petit essai’: Émilie du Châtelet’s Essai dur l’optique and her early natural philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27: 860–879.
Hagengruber, Ruth (ed), 2011. Émilie Du Châtelet: Between Leibniz and Newton, London: Springer.
Hagengruber, Ruth, and Hartmut Hecht (eds.), 2019. Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung, Wiesbaden: Springer.
Huaping, Lu-Adler, 2018. “Between Du Châtelet’s Leibniz Exegesis and Kant’s Early Philosophy: A Study of Their Responses to the vis viva Controversy,” History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 21: 177–194.
Hutton, Sarah, 2004. “Emilie Du Châtelet’s Institutions de Physique as a Document in the History of French Newtonianism,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 515–531.
Hutton, Sarah, 2004. “Women, Science, and Newtonianism: Emilie Du Châtelet versus Francesco Algarotti,” in Newton and Newtonianism, J.E. Force and S. Hutton (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishing, 183–203
Iltis, Carolyn, 1977. “Madame Du Châtelet’s Metaphysics and Mechanics,” Studies in the History of Philosophy of Science, 8(1): 29–48.
Janik, Linda Gardiner, 1982. “Searching for the Metaphysics of Science: the Structure and Composition of Madame Du Châtelet’s Institutions de Physique, 1737–1740,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 201: 85–113.
Jorati, Julia, 2019. “Du Châtelet on Freedom, Self-Motion, and Moral Necessity,” Journal of the History of Philosophy (57): 255–280.
Lascano, Marcy P, 2011. “Emilie du Châtelet on the Existence and Nature of God: An Examination of Her Arguments in Light of Their Sources,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(4): 741–58.
Moriarty, Paul Veatch, 2006. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Du Châtelet’s Institutions,” in Émilie Du Châtelet: Rewriting Enlightenment Philosophy and Science, Judith P. Zinsser and Julie Candler Hayes (eds.), Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 203–225.
Reichenberger, Andrea, 2018. “Émilie Du Châtelet’s interpretation of the laws of motion in the light of 18th century mechanics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (69): 1–11.
Roe, Glenn, 2018. “A Sheep in Wolff’s Clothing: Émilie du Châtelet and the Encyclopédie,” Eighteenth-Century Studies (51): 179–196.
Stan, Marius, 2018. “Emilie du Châtelet’s Metaphysics of Substance,” Journal of the History of Philosophy (56): 477–496.
Suisky, Dieter, 2012. “Leonhard Euler and Emilie du Châtelet. On the Post-Newtonian Development of Mechanics,” in Emilie du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton, Springer Netherlands, 113–155.
Terrall, Mary, 1995. “Emilie du Châtelet and the Gendering of Science,” History of Science, (33): 283–310.
Vaillot, René, 1988. Avec Mme du Châtelet (1734–1749) (Vol. 2 of Voltaire en son temps), Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation.
Wade, I. O., 1941. Voltaire and Madame du Châtelet: An Essay on the Intellectual Activity at Cirey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wade, I. O., 1947. Studies on Voltaire with Some Unpublished Papers of Madame du Châtelet, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zinsser, Judith P., 2005. “The Many Representations of the Marquise Du Châtelet,” in Men, Women, and the Birthing of Modern Science, Judith P. Zinsser (ed.), DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 48–67.
Zinsser, Judith P, 2006. La Dame d’Esprit: A Biography of The Marquise Du Châtelet, New York: Viking.
Zinsser, Judith P., and Julie Candler Hayes, 2006. Emilie Du Châtelet: Rewriting Enlightenment Philosophy and Science, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.

Louise Marie Madeleine Fontaine (1706–1799)

Fontaine, Louise-Marie Madeleine. 1884. Le portefeuille de Madame Dupin, Dame de Chenonceaux: lettres et oeuvres inédites, Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
Fontaine, Louise-Marie Madeleine. 2008. Louise Marie Madeleine Correspondence, Oxford: Electronic Enlightenment Project.
Hunter, Angela, 2009. “The Unfinished Work on Louise Marie-Madeleine Dupin’s Unfinished Ouvrage sur les femmes,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 43(1): 95–111.

David Hume (1711–1776)

Books

Jacobson, Anne Jaap (ed.), 2000. Feminist Interpretations of David Hume, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Richards, Janet Radcliffe, 1980. The Sceptical Feminist: A Philosophical Inquiry, Boston: Routledge and K. Paul.

Articles

Baier, Annette C., 1987. “Hume, the Women’s Moral Theorist,” in Women and Moral Theory, Eva Kittay and Diane T. Meyers (eds.), Totowa NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 37–55. Reprinted in Feminism and History of Philosophy, Genevieve Lloyd (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, 227–250.
Battersby, C., 1981. “An Enquiry Concerning the Humean Woman,” Philosophy (56): 303–312.
Burns, S., 1976. “The Humean Female,” Dialogue 15(3): 414–424.
Burns, S. and L. Marcil-Lacoste, 1997. “Hume on Women,” in The Sexism of Social and Political Theory, L. Clark and L. Lange (eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Duran, Jane, 2004. “Hume on the Gentler Sex,” Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 31(3–4): 487–500.
Frasca-Spada, Marina, 2002. “David Hume and the She-Philosophers,” Philosophical Books, 43(3): 221–226.
Kuflik, Arthur, 1998. “Hume on Justice to Animals, Indians, and Women,” Hume Studies, 24(1): 53–70.
Marcil-Lacoste, L., 1976. “The Consistency of Hume’s Position Concerning Women,” Dialogue, 15(3): 425–440.
Sapp, Vicki G., 1995. “The Philosopher’s Seduction: Hume and the Fair Sex,” Philosophy and Literature, 19(1): 1–15.

Laura Bassi (1711–1778)

Cavazza, Marta, 2010. “Laura Bassi and Giuseppe Veratti: an electric couple during the Enlightenment,” Contributions to Science, 115–124.
Cheatham, G.L., 1998. “Laura Bassi, Physicist,” in Notable Women in the Physical Sciences, Benjamin F. Shearer and Barbara S. Shearer (eds.), Westport, Conn./London: Greenwood Press, 1997.
Dacome, Lucia, 2006. “Waxworks and the Performance of Anatomy in Mid-18th-Century Italy,” Endeavour, 30(1): 29–35.
Elena, A., 1991. “An Introduction to Laura Bassi,” Isis 82: 510–518.
Findlen, Paula, 1993. “Science as a Career in Enlightenment Italy: The Strategies of Laura Bassi,” Isis, 84(3): 441–469.
Frize, Monique, 2013. Laura Bassi and Science in 18th Century Europe: The Extraordinary Life and Role of Italy’s Pioneering Female Professor, Springer-Verlag Berlin An.
Ogilvie, M.B., 1986. “Laura Bassi,” in Women in Science: Antiquity through the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778)

Books

Lange, Lynda (ed.), 2002. Feminist Interpretations of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 1979. Emile, or On Education, Allan Bloom (trans.), New York: Basic Books.
Wingrove, Elizabeth Rose, 2002. Rousseau’s Republican Romance, Princeton University Press.

Articles

Canovan, Margaret, 1987. “Rousseau’s Two Concepts of Citizenship,” in Women in Western Political Philosophy, Ellen Kennedy and Susan Mendus (eds.), Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Gatens, Moira, 1986. “Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Nature vs. Reason,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Supp. 64: 1–15.
Green, Karen, 1996. “Rousseau’s Women,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 4(1): 87–109.
Holland, Nancy J., 1989. “Introduction to Kofman’s ‘Rousseau’s Phallocratic Ends’,” Hypatia 3: 119–122.
Kuster, Friederike, 1999. “Sophie oder Julie? Paradigmen von weiblichkeit und Geschlechterordnung im werk Jean-Jacques Rousseaus,” Deutsche Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie, 47(1): 13–33.
Lange, Lynda, 1981. “Rousseau and Modern Feminism,” in Social Theory and Practice, 7: 245–277.
Lange, Lynda, 1979. “Rousseau: Women and the General Will,” in The Sexism of Social and Political Theory, L. Clark and L. Lange (eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Letzter, Jacqueline and Robert Adelson, 2000. “French Women Opera Composers and the Aesthetics of Rousseau,” Feminist Studies, 26(10): 69–100.
Lloyd, Genevieve, 1983. “Rousseau on Reason, Nature, and Women,” in Metaphilosophy, 14(3&4).
Manning, Rita C., 2001. “Rousseau’s Other Woman: Collette in Le Devin Du Village,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 16(2): 27–42.
Marso, Lori Jo, 2005. “(Un)Manly Citizens: Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s and Germaine de Stael’s Subversive Women,” in Political Theory: An International Journal of Political Philosophy, 33(2).
Martin, J., 1981. “Sophie and Emile: A Case Study of Sex Bias in the History of Educational Thought,” Harvard Educational Review, 51(3): 357–371.
Pateman, Carole, 1980. “’The Disorder of Women’: Women, Love, and the Sense of Justice,” Ethics, 91: 20–31.
Rapaport, Elizabeth, 1973–4. “On the Future of Love: Rousseau and the Radical Feminists,” The Philosophical Forum, 5(1–2): 185–205. Reprinted in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1976.
Sapiro, Virginia and Penny A. Weiss, 1996. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft: Restoring the Conversation,” in Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, Maria J. Falco (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 179–208.
Weiss, Penny, 1990. “Rousseau’s Political Defense of the Sex-Roled Family,” Hypatia, 5(3): 90–109.
Weiss, Penny A., 1996. “Wollstonecraft and Rousseau: The Gendered Face of Political Theorists,” in Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, Maria J. Falco (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 15–32.
Wexler, Victor, 1976. “ 'Made for Man’s Delight': Rousseau as Anti-Feminist,” American Historical Review, 81(2): 266-291.

Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie (1713–1762)

Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1731. Der Frau Marggräfin von Lambert Neue Betrachtungen über das Frauenzimmer, Leipzig.
Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1736. Die Pietisterey im Fischbein-Rocke: Oder die Doctormäßige Frau, Rostock.
Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1739. Triumph der Weltweisheit, nach Art des französischen Sieges der Beredsamkeit der Frau von Gomez, Leipzig.
Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1745. Der Aufseher, oder Vormund, Leipzig.
Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1751. Panthea, ein Trauerspiel in fünf Aufzüugen, Wienn.
Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1760. Das Testament, ein deutsches Lustspiel in fünf Aufzügen, Wienn.
Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1771–76. Briefe der Frau Louise Adelgunde Victorie Gottsched geboren Kulmus, 3 Vols., Dresden.
Gottsched, Luise Adelgunde Viktorie, 1999. Louise Gottsched – ‘mit der Feder in der Hand.’ Briefe aus den Jahren 1730–1762, Inka Kording (ed.), Darmstadt.
Brown, Hilary, 2012. Luise Gottsched the Translator, Rochester: Camden House.

Dorothea Christiane Erxleben (1715–1762)

Books

Erxleben, Dorothea Christiane, 1742. Gründliche Untersuchung der Ursachen, die das weibliche Geschlecht vom Studiren abhalten, Berlin (partially translated in Early Modern German Philosophy (1690–1750), Corey W. Dyck (ed. & transl.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 41–56).
Erxleben, Dorothea Christiane, 1754. Academische Abhandlung von der gar zu geschwinden und angenehmen aber deswegens öfters unsichern Heilung der Krankheiten, Halle.
Erxleben, Dorothea Christiane, 1754. Quod nimis cito ac iucunde curare saepius fiat caussa minus tutae curationis (dissertation).
Böhm, Heinz, 1985. Dorothea Christiane Erxleben—Ihr Leben und Wirken, Quedlinburg: Städtische Museen.
Brinkschulte, Eva and Eva Labouvie (eds.), 2006. Dorothea Christiana Erxleben. Weibliche Gelehrsamkeit und medizinische Profession seit dem 18. Jahrhundert, Halle: Mitteldeutscher Verlag.
Markau, Kornelia, 2006. Dorothea Christiana Erxleben (1715–1762): Die erste promovierte Ärztin Deutschlands. Eine Analyse ihrer lateinischen Promotionsschrift sowie der ersten deutschen Übersetzung, Halle (unpublished Ph.D. thesis).

Articles

Dyck, Corey W., 2021. “On Prejudice and the Limits to Learnedness: Dorothea Christiane Erxleben and the Querelle des Femmes,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51 – 71.
Knabe, Lotte, 1952. “Die erste Promotion einer Frau in Deutschland zum Dr. med. an der Universität Halle 1754,” in 450 Jahre Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Vol. 2: 1694–1817, Halle: Selbstverl. d. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 109–24.
Poeter, Elisabeth, 2008. “Gender, Religion, and Medicine in Enlightenment Germany: Dorothea Christiane Leporin’s Treatise on the Education of Women,” NWSA Journal 20 (1): 99–119.
Stiening, Gideon, 2020. “Feministische Vorurtheilskritik. Dorothea Christiane Leporins Argumente wider das Verbot des Frauenstudiums,” in Feministische Aufklärung in Europa / The Feminist Enlightenment across Europe, Isabel Karremann and Gideon Stiening (eds.), Hamburg: Meiner.

Maria Gaetana Agnesi (1718–1799)

Books

Cupillari, Antonella, 2007. A Biography of Maria Gaetana Agnesi, an Eighteenth-Century Woman Mathematician, with Translations of Some of Her Work from Italian to English, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Mazzotti, Massimo, 2007. The World of Maria Gaetana Agnesi, Mathematician of God (Johns Hopkins Studies in the History of Mathematics), The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Osen, Lynn, 1974. Women in Mathematics, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [See especially 33–48.]. [Also listed under Sophie Germain.]

Articles

Cavazza, Marta, 2009. “Between Modesty and Spectacle: Women and Science in Eighteenth-Century Italy,” in Italy’s Eighteenth Century: Gender and Culture in the Age of the Grand Tour, Findlen, Paula, Roworth, Wendy Wassyng, Sama, Catherine (eds.), Stanford University Press, 275–302.
Findlen, Paula, 2011. “Calculations of Faith: Mathematics, Philosophy, and Sanctity in 18th-Century Italy (new work on Maria Gaetana Agnesi),” Historia Mathematica, 38(2): 248–291.
Mazzotti, Massimo, 2001. “Maria Gaetana Agnesi: Mathematics and the Making of the Catholic Enlightenment,” Isis, 92(4): 657–683.
Truesdell, C., 1989. “Maria Gaetana Agnesi,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 40(2): 113–142.

Immanuel Kant (1724–1804)

Books

Baier, Annette, 1994. Moral Prejudices, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Herman, Barbara, 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgment, Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Holland, Nancy, 1998. The Madwoman’s Dream: The Concept of the Appropriate in Ethical Thought, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hutchings, Kimberly, 1996. Kant, Critique, and Politics, New York: Routledge.
Jauch, Ursula Pia, 1989. Immanuel Kant zur Geschlechterdifferenz: Aufklarerische Vorurteilskritik und burgerliche Geschlechtsvormundschaft, Vienna: Passagen.
Schott, Robin May, 1988. Cognition and Eros: A Critique of the Kantian Paradigm, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.
Schott, Robin May, 1993. A Feminist Critique of the Kantian Paradigm, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schott, Robin May (ed.), 1997. Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Articles

Blum, Lawrence, 1982. “Kant’s and Hegel’s Moral Rationalism: A Feminist Perspective,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12(2): 287–302.
David-Menard, Monique, 2000. “Kant’s An Essay on the Maladies of the Mind and Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(4): 82–98.
Gangavane, Deepti, 2004. “Kant on Femininity,” in Indian Philosophical Quarterly: Journal of the Department of Philosophy—University of Poona, 31(1–4): 359–376.
Heikes, Deborah K., 2001. “Can Kant’s Dialectical Subject Solve the Bias Paradox?,” Contemporary Philosophy, 23(1–2): 16–23.
Hermann, Barbara, 1995. “Ob es sich lohnen konnte, uber Kants Auffassungen von Sexualitat und Ehe nachzudenken?,” Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie, 43(6): 967–988.
Heinrichs, Thomas, 1995. “Die Ehe als Ort gleichberechtigter Lust,” Kant Studien, 86(1): 41–53.
Huseyinzadegan, Dilek, 2018. “For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon,” Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4(1): article 3.
Kneller, Jane, 1993. “Discipline and Silence: Women and Imagination in Kant’s Theory of Taste,” in Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective, Hilde Hein (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
LaCaze, Marguerite, 2005. “Love, that Indispensable Supplement: Irigaray and Kant on Love and Respect,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 20(3): 92–114.
Lango, John W., 1998. “Does Kant’s Ethics Ignore Relations Between Persons?,” in Norms and Values: Essays on the Work of Virginia Held, Joram Graf Haber (ed.), Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mendus, Susan, 1987. “Kant: An Honest but Narrow-Minded Bourgeois?,” in Women in Western Political Philosophy, Ellen Kennedy and Susan Mendus (eds.), Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Mosser, Kurt, 1999. “Kant and Feminism,” Kant-Studien: Philosophische zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft, 90(3): 322–353.
Moyer, Jeanna, 2001. “Why Kant and Ecofeminism Don’t Mix,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 16(3): 79–97.
Okin, Susan Moller, 1989. “Reason and Feeling in Thinking about Justice,” Ethics, 99: 229–249.
Ritter, Bernhard, 2021. “Solace or Counsel for Death: Kant and Maria von Herbert,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137–156.
Ross, Alison, 2000. “Introduction to Monique David-Menard on Kant and Madness,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(4): 77–81.
Sabourin, Charlotte, 2021. “Kant’s Enlightenment and Women’s Peculiar Immaturity,” Kantian Review, 26(2): 235–260.
Schott, Robin May, 1998. “Feminism and Kant: Antipathy or Sympathy?,” in Autonomy and Community, Jane E. Kneller (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Schott, Robin May, 1998. “Kant,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Sedgwick, Sally, 1990. “Can Kant’s Ethics Survive the Feminist Critique?,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 71(1): 60–79.
Uleman, Jennifer K., 2000. “On Kant, Infanticide, and Finding Oneself in a State of Nature,” Zeitschrift fuer philosophische Forschung, 54(2): 173–195.
Villarmea, Stella, 2004. “En el corazon de la libertad: El universalismo kantiano desde una aproximacion de genero,” Endoxa: Series Filosoficas, 18: 321–336
Wilson, Holyn, 1997. “Kant and Ecofeminism,” in Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature, Karen J. Warren (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Zweig, Arnulf, 1993. “Kant and the Family,” in Kindred Matters, Diana Tietjens Meyers (ed.), Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Johanna Charlotte Unzer (1725–1782)

Books

Unzer, Johanna Charlotte, 1751. Grundriss einer Weltweisheit für das Frauenzimmer, Halle: Hemmerde. (1767, 2^nd edn.; 1995 reprint, with an introduction by Heidemarie Bennent-Vahle, Aachen: Ein-Fach-Verlag).
Unzer, Johanna Charlotte, 1751. Grundriss einer Natürlichen Historie und eigentlichen Naturlehre für das Frauenzimmer, Halle: Hemmerde.
Gehring, Thomas A., 1973. Johanne Charlotte Unzer-Ziegler, Ein Ausschnitt aus dem literarischen Leben in Halle, Göttingen und Altona, Bern/Frankfurt: Lang.
Langer, Thurid (ed.), 1996. Über die Gelehrsamkeit eines Frauenzimmers: Texte von und über Frauenzimmer von Johanna Charlotte Unzerin, Johann Gottlob Krüger, Georg Friedrich Meier, Johann Joachim Lange, Halle: Hallescher Verlag.
Meyer, Ursula, 2018. Philosophinnen Leben: Johanna Charlotte Unzer, Aachen: Ein-Fach-Verlag.

Articles

Buchenau, Stefanie, 2021. “A Modern Diotima: Johanna Charlotte Unzer on Wolffianism and Aesthetics,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–50.
Langer, Thurid, 1996. “Johanna Charlotte Unzerin — die erste deutsche Weltweise,” in Über die Gelehrsamkeit eines Frauenzimmers: Texte von und über Frauenzimmer von Johanna Charlotte Unzerin, Johann Gottlob Krüger, Georg Friedrich Meier, Johann Joachim Lange, Thurid Langer (ed.), Halle: Hallescher Verlag, 8–22.

Louise D’Epinay (1726–1783)

Books

David, O., 2007. L’autobiographie de convenance de Madame d’Epinay: Ecrivain-philosophe des Lumières-Subversion idéologique et formelle de l’écriture de soi, Editions L’Harmattan.
Steegmuller, Francis, 1991. A Woman, a Man, and Two Kingdoms: the Story of Madame d’Épinay and the Abbé Galiani, Knopf.
Weinreb, Ruth Plaut, 1993. Eagle in a Gauze Cage: Louise d’Epinay, femme de lettres. Vol. 23, AMS Press.

Articles

Parker, Alice, 1981. “Louise d’Epinay’s Account of Female Epistemology and Sexual Politic,” The French Review, 55(1): 43–51.
Trouille, Mary, 1996. “Sexual/Textual Politics in the Enlightenment: Diderot and D’Epinay Respond to Thomas’s Essay on Women,” Journal for Eighteenth‐Century Studies, 19(1): 1–15.
Trouille, Mary, 1996. “La Femme Mal Mariee: Mme d’Epinay’s Challenge to Julie and Emile,” Eighteenth-Century Life, 20(1): 42–66.

Mercy Otis Warren (1727–1814)

Books

Warren, Mercy Otis, 1788. Observations on the New Constitution, and on the Federal and State Conventions. By a Columbian Patriot, Boston.
Warren, Mercy Otis, 1805. History of the Rise, Progress and Termination of the American Revolution. Interspersed with Biographical, Political and Moral Observations, 3 vols., Boston: Printed by Manning and Loring.
Warren, Mercy Otis and John Adams, 1878. Correspondence between John Adams and Mercy Warren relating to her History of the American Revolution 1878 (Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, vol. 4), Boston.
Warren, Mercy Otis, Mercy Otis Warren Papers. Massachusetts Historical Society: available online (accessed March 21st 2021).
Anthony, Katharine, 1958. First Lady of the Revolution, NY: Doubleday.
Brown, Alice, 1896. Mercy Warren, NY: Scribners.
Davies, Kate, 2006. Catharine Macaulay and Mercy Otis Warren: The Revolutionary Atlantic and the Politics of Gender, UK: Oxford UP.
Ellet, Elizabeth F., 1850. The Women of the American Revolution, 3 vols, NY: Baker and Scribners.
Richards, Jeffrey H., 1995. Mercy Otis Warren, NY: Twayne.
Zagarri, Rosemarie, 1995. A Woman’s Dilemma: Mercy Otis Warren and the American Revolution, Wheeling, Il: Harlan Davidson.

Articles

Marble, Anne Russell, 1903. “Mistress Mercy Warren: Real Daughter of the American Revolution,” The New England Magazine (April), 28–99.
McDonald, Janis L., 1992. “The Need for Contextual Revision: Mercy Otis Warren, A Case in Point,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 8 (1): 182–215.

Catharine Macaulay (1731–1791)

Books

Macaulay, Catherine Sawbridge, n.d. The History of England from the Accession of James I to the Brunswick Line, 8 vols. London, 1763–83.
Macaulay, Catherine Sawbridge, 1767. Loose Remarks on Certain Positions to be found in Mr. Hobbes’ ‘Philosophical Rudiments of Government and Society’, with a Short Sketch of a Democratic Form of Government, In a Letter to Signor Paoli, London.
Macaulay, Catherine Sawbridge, 1770. Observations on a Pamphlet entitled ‘Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents,’ London.
Macaulay, Catherine Sawbridge, 1783. A Treatise on the Immutability of Moral Truth, London.
Macaulay, Catherine Sawbridge, 1790. Letters on Education with Observations on Religious and Metaphysical Subjects, Reprint, Yeadon: Woodstock Books, 1995.
Macaulay, Catherine Sawbridge, 1790. Observations on the Reflections of the Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke, on the Revolution in France, London.
Davies, Kate, 2005. Catharine Macaulay and Mercy Otis Warren: the Revolutionary Atlantic and the Politics of Gender, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, Bridget, 1992. The Republican Virago: The Life and Times of Catharine Macaulay, Historian, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Titone, Connie, 2004. Gender Equality in the Philosophy of Education: Catherine Macaulay’s Forgotten Contribution, New York: Peter Lang.

Articles

Boos, F., 1976. “Catherine Macaulay’s Letters on Education (1790): An Early Feminist Polemic,” University of Michigan Papers in Women’s Studies, 2(2): 64–78.
Gardner, Catherine, 1998. “Catharine Macaulay’s ‘Letters on Education’: Odd but Equal,” Hypatia, 13(1): 118–137.
Gardner, Catherine Villanueva, 2000. “Catherine Macaulay’s Letters on Education: What Constitutes a Philosophical System,” in Rediscovering Women Philosophers: Philosophical Genre and the Boundaries of Philosophy, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Green, Karen, 2012. “Liberty and Virtue in Catherine Macaulay’s Enlightenment Philosophy,” in Intellectual History Review (Special Issue: Women, Philosophy and Literature in the Early Modern Period), 22(3): 411–26.
Green, Karen, 2012. “When is a Contract Theorist Not A Contract Theorist? Mary Astell and Catherine Macaulay as Critics of Thomas Hobbes,” in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, Nancy J.Hiaschmann and Joanne H. Wright (eds.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 169–189.
Green, K., & Weekes, S., 2013. “Catharine Macaulay on the Will,” History of European Ideas, 39(3): 409–425.
Gunther-Canada, Wendy, 2012. “Catherine Macaulay’s ‘Loose Remarks’ on Hobbesian Politics,” in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, Nancy J. Hiaschmann and Joanne H. Wright (eds.), University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 190–215.
Gunther-Canada, W., 2003. “Cultivating virtue: Catharine Macaulay and Mary Wollstonecraft on civic education,” Women & Politics, 25(3): 47–70.
Hicks, Philip, 2002. “Catharine Macaulay’s Civil War: Gender, history, and Republicanism in Georgian Britain,” Journal of British Studies, 41(2): 170–99.
Hutton, Sarah, 2005. “Liberty, Equality and God: The Religious Roots Catherine Macaulay’s Feminism,” in Women, Gender and Enlightenment, Barbara Taylor and Sarah Knott (eds.), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hutton, Sarah, 2007. “Virtue, God and Stoicism in the thought of Elizabeth Carter and Catharine Macaulay,” in Virtue, Liberty and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women 1400–1800, Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer.
O’Brien, Karen, 2005. “Catharine Macaulay’s Histories of England: A Female Perspective on the History of Liberty,” in Women, Gender and Enlightenment, Barbara Taylor and Sarah Knott (eds.), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pocock, J.G.A., 1998. “Catherine Macaulay: Patriot Historian,” in Women Writers and the Early Modern British Political Tradition, Hilda L. Smith (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reuter, Martina, 2007. “Macaulay and Wollstonecraft on the Will,” in Virtue, Liberty and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women, 1400–1800, Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer.
Wiseman, Susan, 2001. “Catharine Macaulay: history, republicanism and the public sphere,” in Women, Writing and the Public Sphere, 1700–1830, E. Eger, C. Grant, C. O Gallchoir and P. Warburton (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elise Reimarus (1735–1805)

Books

Reimarus, Elise, 1791. Freiheit, Hamburg.
Almut M.G. Spalding, 2005. Elise Reimarus (1735–1805) The Muse of Hamburg: A Woman of the German Enlightenment, Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann. [contains a collection of Elise Reimarus’ shorter texts.]

Articles

Alexander, Gerhard, 1985. “Johann Albert Hinrich Reimarus und Elise Reimarus in ihren Beziehungen zu Lessing,” in Lessing und der Kreis seiner Freunde, Günter Schulz (ed.), Heidelberg: Schneider.
Badt-Strauß, Bertha, 1932. “Elise Reimarus und Moses Mendelssohn,” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte der Juden in Deutschland 4: 173–189.
Curtis-Wendlandt, Lisa, 2012. “No Right to Resist? Elise Reimarus’s ‘Freedom’ as a Kantian Response to the Problem of Violent Revolt,” Hypatia 27 (4): 755 – 773.
Curtis-Wendlandt, Lisa, 2013. “Legality and Morality in the Political Thought of Elise Reimarus and Immanuel Kant,” in Political Ideas of Enlightenment Women: Virtue and Citizenship, Lisa Curtis-Wendlandt et al. (eds.), Routledge.
Horvath, Eva, 1976. “Die Frau im gesellschaftlichen Leben Hamburgs. Meta Klopstock, Eva König, Elise Reimarus,” in Wolfenbüttler Studien zur Aufklärung 3: 175–194.
Sieveking, Heinrich, 1940. “Elise Reimarus (1735–1805) in den geistigen Kämpfen ihrer Zeit,” Zeitschrift des Vereins für Hamburgische Geschichte 39: 86 – 138.
Spalding, Almut, 2003. “Elise Reimarus’s ‘Cato’: The Canon of the Enlightenment Revisited,” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 102 (3): 376–89.
Spalding, Almut M.G., 2006. “Siblings, Publications, and the Transmission of Memory: Johann Albert Heinrich and Elise Reimarus,” in Sibling Relations and Gender in the Early Modern World: Sisters, Brothers and Others, Naomi J. Miller and Naomi Yavneh (eds.), New York and Milton Park: Ashgate, 216 – 227.
Vierhaus, Rudolf, 1998. “Lessing und Elise Reimarus,” Lessing Yearbook 30: 161–170.
Winegar, Reed, 2021. “Elise Reimarus on Freedom and Rebellion,” in Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel: Freedom, Right, and Revolution, Gabriel Gottlieb and James Clarke (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–117.
Winegar, Reed, 2021. “Elise Reimarus: Reason, Religion, and the Enlightenment,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 110–136.

Isabelle de Charriére (1740–1805)

Books

Charriére, Isabelle de, 2008. Correspondence, Electronic Enlightenment Project.
Allison, Jenene J., 1995. Revealing Difference: The Fiction of Isabelle de Charrière, University of Delaware Press.
Letzter, Jacqueline, 1998. Intellectual Tacking: Questions of Education in the Works of Isabelle de Charrière, Vol. 145, Rodopi.
Letzter, Jacqueline, and Robert Adelson, 2001. Women Writing Opera, University of California Press.
Samsom, Jelka, 2005. Individuation and Attachment in the Works of Isabelle de Charrière: Jelka Samsom, Vol. 16, Peter Lang.

Articles

Fisch, Gina, 2005. “Charriere’s Untimely Realism: Aesthetic Representation and Literary Pedagogy in Lettres de Lausanne and La Princesse de Cleves,” MLN, 119(5): 1058–1082.
Rooksby, Emma, 2005. “Moral Theory in the Fiction of Isabelle de Charrière: The Case of Three Women,” Hypatia, 20(1): 1–20.

Theodor Gottlieb von Hippel (1741–1796)

von Hippel, Theodor Gottlieb, 2009. The Status of Women: Collected Writings, Timothy F. Sellner (ed. & transl.), Xlibris.
Beck, Hamilton H. H., 1980. “Tristram Shandy und Hippel’s Lebensläufe nach aufsteigender Linie,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture (10): 261–78.
Dawson, Ruth, 1980. “The Feminist Manifesto of Theodor Gottlieb von Hippel (1741–96),” in Gestaltet und Gestaltend: Frauen in der Deutschen Literatur, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Sabourin, Charlotte, 2021. “Theodor Gottlieb von Hippel on the Status of Women in the State,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–178.
Sotiropoulos, Carol S., 2007. Early Feminists and the Education Debates: England, France, Germany, 1760–1810, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. [includes discussions of Theodor von Hippel and Amalia Holst.]

Stephanie Félicité de Genlis (1746–1830)

Books

Genlis, Stéphanie Félicité, 2007. Adelaide and Theodore, or Letters on Education (1783), Gillian Dow (ed.), London: Pickering & Chatto.

Articles

Baumgartner, Karin, 2011. “In Search of Literary Mothers Across the Rhine: the Influence of Genlis and Staël on the Writing of Helmina Von Chezy,” Women’s Writing, 18(1): 50–67.
Cook, Malcolm, 2005. “Writing for Charity: Mme de Genlis and Thérésina,” Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 17(3): 537–550.
Dow, Gillian, 2012. “Stéphanie-Félicité de Genlis and the French historical novel in Romantic Britain,” Women’s Writing, 19(3): 273–292.
Heuer, Imke, 2011. “Something in Mme de Genlis Stile: Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire’s ‘Zillia’, Playwriting and Female Aristocratic Authorship,” Women’s Writing, 18(1): 68–85.
Parfitt, Alexandra, 2013. “Far From the Whirlwind: Christian Ethics and the Classical Tradition in Genlis’ Pedagogy,” RELIEF-Revue électronique de littérature française, 7(1): 4–18.
Schaneman, Judith Clark, 2001. “Rewriting Adèle et Théodore: Connections Between Madame de Genlis and Ann Radcliffe,” Comparative Literature Studies, 38(1): 31–45.
Schroder, Anne L., 1999. “Going Public against the Academy in 1784: Mme de Genlis Speaks out on Gender Bias,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 32(3): 376–382.
Still, Judith, 2000. “The Re-working of La Nouvelle Heloise in Genlis’s Mademoiselle de Clermont,” French Studies Bulletin, 21(77): 7–11.
Walker, Lesley H, 2004. “Producing Feminine Virtue: Strategies of Terror in Writings by Madame de Genlis,” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 23(2): 213–236.

Olympe de Gouges (1748–1793)

Gouges, Olympe de, 1791. “Declaration of the Rights of Women,” in Women in Revolutionary Paris, 1789–1795, D. G. Levy, H. B. Applewhite, and M.D. Johnson (eds.), Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1980, 87–96; hosted at American Studies Program website, City University of New York.
Gouges, Olympe de, 1994. “Black Slavery, or the Happy Shipwreck,” in Translating Slavery; Gender and Race in French Women’s Writing, 1783–1823, Maryann De Julio (trans.), Doris Kadish and Franҫoise Massardiare-Kenney (eds.), Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 87–119.
Cole, John R. and Gouges, Olympe de, 2011. Between the queen and the cabby: Olympe de Gouges’ Rights of Women, Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.
Moussett, Sophie, 2007. Women’s Rights and The French Revolution: a Biography of Olympe de Gouges, Joy Poirel (trans.), New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Sherman, Carol L, 2013. Reading Olympe de Gouges, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, Gregory S., 2001. “The Self-Fashioning of Olympe de Gouges, 1784–89,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 34(3): 383–401.
Vanpée, Janie, 1999. “Performing Justice: The Trials of Olympe de Gouges,” Theatre Journal, 51(1): 47–65.

Madame Roland (Marie-Jeanne ‘Manon’ Roland de la Platiére) (1754–1793)

Roland, Marie-Jeanne, 1986. Mémoires de Madame Roland. Paul de Roux, (ed.), Paris: Mercure de France.
Macarthur, Elizabeth, 1997. “Between the republic of virtue and the republic of letters: Marie-Jeanne Roland practices Rousseau,” Yale French Studies, 92: 184–203.
May, Gita, 1970. Madame Roland and the Age of Revolution, New York: Columbia University Press.
Reynolds, Sian, 2012. Marriage and Revolution: Monsieur and Madame Roland, Oxford University Press.
Walker, Lesley H, 2001. “Sweet and consoling virtue: The memoirs of Madame Roland,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 34(3): 403–419.

Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797)

Books

Anonymous, 1960 [1790]. A Vindication of the Rights of Men, in a Letter to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, London: Joseph Johnson, November, 1790 anonymous; December, 1790 bearing Wollstonecraft’s authorship, Eleanor Louise Nicholes (ed.), Gainesville, Florida: Scholar’s Fascimilies & Reprints.
Wollstonecraft, Mary, 1989. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, 7 vols., J. Todd and M. Butler (eds.), Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Wollstonecraft, Mary, 1788. Original Stories from Real Life: with Conversations Calculated to Regulate the Affections and Form the Mind to Truth and Goodness, London: Joseph Johnson (with illustrations by William Blake).
Wollstonecraft, Mary, 1979 [1789]. The Female Reader: or Miscellaneous Pieces, in Prose and Verse: Selected from the Best Writers, and Disposed under Proper Heads: for the Improvement of Young Women, London: Joseph Johnson; Moira Ferguson (ed.), Delmar, New York: Scholar’s Facsimiles.
Wollstonecraft, Mary, 1972 [1792]. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects, London: Joseph Johnson; Miriam Brody Kramnick (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Wollstonecraft, Mary, 1993 [1794]. An Historical and Moral View of the Origin and Progress of the French Revolution; and the Effect it has produced in Europe, London: Joseph Johnson; Janet Todd (ed.) in Political Writings: A Vindication of the Rights of Men, A vindication of the Rights of Woman, An historical and Moral View of the French Revolution, London: Pickering; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wollstonecraft, Mary, 1976 [1796]. Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, London: Joseph Johnson; Carol H. Poston (ed.), Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Botting, Eileen Hunt, 2006. Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family, Albany, NY: The State University of New York Press.
Gunther-Canada,Wendy, 2001. Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics, DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.
Falco, Maria J. (ed.), 1996. Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
Taylor, Barbara, 2003. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Articles

Abbey, Ruth, 1999. “Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(3): 78–95.
Barker-Benfield, G. J., 1989. “Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthwoman,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 50: 95–115.
Botting, Eileen Hunt, 2006. “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Enlightened Legacy: The Modern Social Imaginary; of the Egalitarian Family,” American Behavioral Scientist, 49(5): 687–701.
Botting, Eileen Hunt and Christine Carey, 2004. “Wollstonecraft’s Philosophical Impact on Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Rights Advocates,” American Journal of Political Science, 48(4): 707–722.
Brace, Laura, 2000. “‘Not Empire, but Equality’: Mary Wollstonecraft, the Marriage State and the Sexual Contract,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(4): 433–455.
Brody, Miriam, 1983. “Mary Wollstonecraft: Sexuality and Women’s Rights,” in Feminist Theories, Dale Spender (ed.), London: The Women’s Press.
Gatens, Moira, 1986. “Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Nature vs. Reason,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy (Supplement), 64: 1–15.
Grimshaw, Jean, 1989. “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Tensions in Feminist Philosophy,” Radical Philosophy, 52: 11–17.
Gubar, Susan, 1994. “Feminist Misogyny: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Paradox of ‘It Takes One to Know One’,” Feminist Studies, 20(3): 453–473.
Heyes, Cressida, 2000. “Teaching Wollstonecraft’s Maria, or the Wrongs of Woman,” Teaching Philosophy, 23(2): 111–125.
Howard, Carol, 2004. “Wollstonecraft’s Thoughts on Slavery and Corruption,” The Eighteenth Century, 45(1): 61–86.
Janes, R. M., 1978. “On the Reception of Mary Wollstonecraft’s ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Women’,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39: 293–302.
Juengel, Scott, 2001. “Countenancing History: Mary Wollstonecraft, Samuel Stanhope Smith, and Enlightenment Racial Science,” English Literary History, 68(4): 897–927.
Korsmeyer, Carolyn, 1976, “Reason and Morals in the Early Feminist Movement: Mary Wollstonecraft,” in Philosophical Forum (Boston), 5(1–2) (1973–1974). Reprinted in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Larson, Elizabeth, 1992. “Mary Wollstonecraft and Women’s Rights,” Free Inquiry, 12(2): 45–48.
Mackenzie, Catriona, 1996. “Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of M. Wollstonecraft,” in Hypatia’s Daughters: Fifteen Hundred Years of Women Philosophers, Linda Lopez McAlister (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
McCrystal, John, 1993. “Revolting Women: The Use of Revolutionary Discourse in Mary Astell and Mary Wollstonecraft Compared,” History of Political Thought, 14(2): 189–203.
Mellor, Anne K., 1997. “Sex, Violence, and Slavery: Blake and Wollstonecraft,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 58(3): 345–370.
Nicholson, Mervyn, 1990. “The Eleventh Commandment: Sex and Spirit in Wollstonecraft and Malthus,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 51: 401–21.
Perreault, Jeanne, 2001. “Mary Wollstonecraft and Harriet Jacobs: Self Possessions,” in Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley: Writing Lives, Helen M. Buss and David Lorne Macdonald (eds.), Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Reuter, Martina, 2007. “Macaulay and Wollstonecraft on the Will,” in Virtue, Liberty and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women, 1400–1800, Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green (eds), Dordrecht: Springer.
Taylor, Barbara, 1999. “Misogyny and Feminism: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft,” Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 6(4): 499–512.
Wexler, Alice, 1981. “Mary Wollstonecraft, Her Tragic Life and Her Passionate Struggle for Freedom,” Feminist Studies, 7: 114–133.
Wingrove, Elizabeth, 2005. “Getting Intimate with Wollstonecraft: In the Republic of Letters,” Political Theory: An International Journal of Political Philosophy, 33(3): 344–369.
Zaw, Susan Khin, 1998. “The Reasonable Heart: Mary Wollstonecraft’s View of the Relation between Reason and Feeling in Morality, Moral Psychology, and Moral Development,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 13(1): 78–117.

Mary Hays (1759–1843)

Books

Hays, Mary and Marilyn L. Brooks, 2000. Memoirs of Emma Courtney, (Broadview Literary Texts), Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
Hays, Mary, 2005. The Idea of Being Free: A Mary Hays Reader, Gina Luria Walker (ed.), Toronto, Ontario: Broadview Press.
Walker, Gina Luria, 2006. Mary Hays, (1759–1843): The growth of a woman’s mind, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Articles

Purdie, Susan and Sarah Oliver, 2010. “William Frend and Mary Hays: Victims of Prejudice,” Women’s Writing, 17(1): 93–110.
Ward, Ian, 2009. “The Prejudices of Mary Hays,” International Journal of Law in Context, 5(2): 131–146.

Sophie de Grouchy (1764–1822)

de Grouchy, Sophie, 2008 [1830]. Letters on Sympathy (1798): A Critical Edition, Karin Brown (ed.), and James E. McClellan III (trans.), Collingdale, PA: DIANE Publishing Company.
Brookes, B., 1980. “The Feminism of Condorcet and Sophie de Grouchy,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 189: 297–362.
Dawson, D., 2004. “From Moral Philosophy to Public Policy: Sophie de Grouchy’s Translation and Critique of Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments,” in Scotland and France in the Enlightenment, D. Dawson and P. Morère (eds.), Lewisburg, Pa: Bucknell University Press.
Forget, E. L., 2001. “Cultivating Sympathy: Sophie Condorcet’s Letters on sympathy,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(3): 319–337.

Amalia Holst (1764–1847)

Holst, Amalia, 1791. Bemerkungen über die Fehler unserer modernen Erziehung, von einer praktischen Erzieherin, Leipzig.
Holst, Amalia, 1802. Über die Bestimmung des Weibes zur höhern Geistesbildung, Berlin.
Fronius, Helen, 2007. Women and Literature in the Goethe Era 1770–1820: Determined Dilettantes, Oxford University Press. [includes a section on Amalia Holst’s debates on women’s education.]
Kourany, Janet A., 1998. Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [includes Holst and others.]
Louden, Robert, 2021. “A Mere Skeleton of the Sciences? Amalia Holst’s Critique of Basedow and Campe,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 72–94.
Sotiropoulos, Carol S., 2004. “Scandal Writ Large in the Wake of the French Revolution: The Case of Amalia Holst,” Women in German Yearbook 20: 98–121.
Sotiropoulos, Carol S., 2007. Early Feminists and the Education Debates: England, France, Germany, 1760–1810, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. [includes discussions of Theodor von Hippel and Amalia Holst.]
Tanaka, Mikiko, 2016. “Holst, Amalia,” in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers, Heiner F. Klemme and Manfred Kuehn (eds.), London: Bloomsbury, 358.

Madame de Staël (Anne Louise Germaine Necker) (1766–1817)

Books

Staël, Germaine, 1859. Germany, Orlando W. Wight (trans.) Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
Staël, Germaine, 1970. Madame de Staël et J.-B.-A. Suard: correspondance inédite (1786–1817) (Vol. 17), Geneva: Librairie Droz.
Staël, Germaine, 1992. Major Writings of Germaine de Staël, Vivian Folkenflik (ed. & transl.), New York: Columbia University Press.
Staël, Germaine, 2000. Politics, Literature, and National Character, Morroe Berger (ed. & transl.), New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Fairweather, Maria, 2005. Madame de Staël, New York: Carroll & Graf.
Goodden, Angelica, 2008. Madame de Staël: The Dangerous Exile, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gray, Francine du Plessix, 2008. Madame de Staël: The First Woman, New York: Atlas & Co.
Gutwirth, Madelyn, 1978. Madame de Staël, Novelist: The Emergence of the Artist as a Woman, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Herold, J. Christopher, 2002. Mistress to an Age: A Life of Madame de Staël, New York: Grove Press.
Lord, Susan Toth, 2004. Extraordinary Women All: The Influence of Madame de Staël on Margaret Fuller and Lydia Maria Child, Kent State University, unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
Posgate, Helen B., 1968. Madame de Staël, New York: Twayne.
Winegarten, Renee, 1985. Mme. de Staël, Dover, New Hampshire: Berg.
Winegarten, Renee, 2008. Germaine de Staël & Benjamin Constant: a Dual Biography, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Articles

Berger, Morroe, 2000. “An Introduction to the Life and Thought of Madame de Staël,” in Germaine de Staël, Politics, Literature, and National Character, Morroe Berger (ed. & transl.), New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1–89.
Bruin, Karen de, 2013. “Romantic Aesthetics and Abolitionist Activism: African Beauty in Germaine de Staël’s Mirza ou Lettre d’un voyageur,” Symposium 67 (3): 135–147.
Bruin, Karen de, 2015. “An Eighteenth-Century Call to be Heeded: On Germaine de Staël, Aesthetic Education, and National Progress,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 49 (1): 82–97.
Higonnet, Margaret R., 1986. “Madame de Staël and Schelling,” in Comparative Literature, 38(2): 159–180.
Kadish, Doris Y., 1994. “Patriarchy and Abolition: Germaine de Staël,” in Translating Slavery: Gender and Race in French Women’s Writing, 1783–1823, Doris Y. Kadish and Francoise Massardier-Kenney (eds.), Ohio: Kent State University Press, 31–52.
Marso, Lori J., 1998. “The Stories of Citizens: Rousseau, Montesquieu, and de Staël Challenge Enlightenment Reason,” Polity, 30(3): 435–463.
Martin, Judith E., 2002. “Nineteenth-Century German Literary Women’s Reception of Madame de Staël,” Women in German Yearbook 18:133–157.
Moland, Lydia L., 2021. “Is She not an Unusual Woman? Say More: Germaine de Staël and Lydia Maria Child on Progress, Art, and Abolition,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–233.
Sluga, Glenda, 2003. “Gender and the nation: Madame de Staël or Italy,” Women’s Writing, 10(2): 241–251.
Takeda, C., 2007. “Apology of Liberty in Lettres sur les ouvrages et le caractère de J.-J. Rousseau: Mme de Staël’s Contribution to the Discourse on Natural Sociability,” in European Review of History-Revue européenne d’Histoire, 14(2): 165–193.

Other Eighteenth Century Philosophy

Primary sources

Algarotti, Francesco, 1737. Il newtonianisme per le dame, ovvero Dialoghi sopra la luce e i colori, Napoli.
Basedow, Johann Bernhard, and Joachim Heinrich Campe, 1777. “Schreiben eines Frauenzimmers an ihre Freundinn, den Unterricht überhaupt betreffend. Nebst einer kleinen Kinderphilosophie,” in Pädogogische Unterhandlungen, Dessau: Crusius, 812–821.
Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat, 1847. “Sur l’admission des femmes au droit de Cité,” Paris: Firmin Didot frères.
Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat, 1912. The First Essay on the Political Rights of Women. A Translation of Condorcet’s Essay “Sur l’admission des femmes au droit de Cité” (On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship), Alice Drysdale Vickery (trans.), Letchworth: Garden City Press.
Eberti, Johann Caspar, 1706. Eröffnetes Cabinet Deß Gelehrten Frauen-Zimmers, Frankfurt/Leipzig (reprinted in Archiv für philosophie- und theologiegeschichtliche Frauenforschung,E. Gössmann ed., Vol. 3., Munich: iudicium Verlag, 1986).
Huber, Marie, 1761. Letters Concerning the Religion Essential to Man: as it is distinct from what is merely an assession to it, Glasglow: Printed for Robert Urie.
Huber, Marie, and Nathaniel Stacy, 1817. The State of Souls Separated from Their Bodies: Being an Epistolary Treatise, Wherein it is Proved, by a Variety of Arguments Deduced from the Holy Scriptures, the Punishments of the Wicked Will Not be Endless, and All Objections Against it Solved; to which is Prefixed a Large Introduction, Evincing the Same Truth, from the Principles of Natural Religion, Cooperstown, NY: I.W. Clark.
Paullini, Christian Franz, 1705. Das Hoch-und Wohl-gelahrte Teutsche Frauen-Zimmer, Frankfurt and Leipzig.

Secondary sources

Albrecht, Ruth, 2004. “Frauen,” in Geschichte des Pietismus, Band 4: Glaubenswelten und Lebenswelten, Hartmut Lehmann (ed.), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 522–55.
Hermesdorf, Marcellal C., 2003. “Hannah More and Dominican Values,” New Blackfriars, 84(994): 554–570.
Hutton, Sarah, 2007. “Virtue, God and Stoicism in the thought of Elizabeth Carter and Catharine Macaulay,” in Virtue, Liberty and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women 1400–1800, Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer.
Findlen, Paula, 2011. “Mio ﬁlosofo caro: Clelia Grillo Borromeo, Antonio Vallisneri, and the Nature of Philosophical Friendship,” in Calculations of Faith Clelia Grillo Borromeo Arese. Un salotto letterario settecentesco tra arte, scienza e politica, Dario Generali, Andrea Spiriti and Ezio Vaccari (eds.), Biblioteca dell’Edizione Nazionale delle Opere di Antonio Vallisneri, Florence.
Popkin, Jeremy, 1985. “The Condorcet-Suard Correspondence,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 18(4): 550–557.
Roudinesco, É, 1991. Theroigne de Mericourt: A Melancholic Woman during the French Revolution, Martin Thom (trans.), London: Verso.
Rumore, Paola, 2021. “Wilhelmine of Bayreuth and the German Enlightenment,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 95–109.
Sepinwall, Alyssa Goldstein, 2010. “Robespierre, Old Regime Feminist? Gender, the Late Eighteenth Century, and the French Revolution Revisited.” The Journal of Modern History (1): 1–29.

Nineteenth Century Philosophy

General Nineteenth

Books

Cawardine, Richard J., 1993. Evangelicals and Politics in Antebellum America, New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Cogan, Frances B., 1989. All-American Girl: The Ideal of Real Womanhood in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America, Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Cott, Nancy F., 1977. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Women’s Sphere” in New England, 1780 – 1835, New Haven: Yale University Press.
DeBerg, Betty, 1990. Ungodly Women: Gender and the First Wave of American Fundamentalism, Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
De Haan, Francisca et al, 2006. Biographical Dictionary of Women’s Movements and Feminisms in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe, Budapest: Central European University Press.
Donald, Diana, 2019. Women against cruelty: Protection of animals in nineteenth-century Britain, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 196–198.
DuBois, E., 1999. Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women’s Movement in America, 1848–1869. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Flexner, Eleanor, 1959. Century of Struggle: The Woman’s Rights Movement in the United States, Cambridge: Belknap.
Gleadle, Kathryn, 2001. British Women in the Nineteenth Century, NY: Palgrave.
Haynes, Carolyn, 1998. Divine Destiny: Gender and Race in Nineteenth-Century Protestantism, Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi.
Levine, Philippa, 1989. Victorian Feminism, 1850 – 1900, Cambridge UP.
Moses, Claire Goldberg, 1984. French Feminism in the Nineteenth Century. Albany: State University of New York Press.
O’Neill, William L, 1989. Feminism in America: A History, 2nd ed., New Brujiswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Paletschek, Sylvia, and Bianka Pietrow-Ennker, 2004. Women’s Emancipation Movements in the Nineteenth Century: A European Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rendall, Jane, 1982. Women in an Industrialising Society: England 1750–1880, Cambridge UP.
Robertson, Priscilla Smith, 1982. An Experience of Women: Pattern and Change in Nineteenth Century Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Schönfeld, Walther H.P., 1947. Frauen in der abendländischen Heilkunde vom klassischen Altertum bis zum Ausgang des 19. Jahrhunderts, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll, 1985. Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America, Oxford UP.
Taylor, Barbara, 1983. Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Pantheon Books.
Welter, Barbara, 1976. Dimity Convictions: The American Woman in the Nineteenth Century, Athens: Ohio UP, 1976.
Westerkamp, Marilyn J., 1999. Women and Religion in Early America, 1600–1850: The Puritan and Evangelical Traditions, London/NY: Routledge.
Whittle, Ruth, 2013. Gender, Canon, and Literary History. The Changing Places of 19^th Century German Woman Writers, Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Wilhelmy-Dollinger, Petra, 2000. Die Berliner Salons: Mit historisch-literarischen Spaziergängen, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.

Articles

Becker-Cantarino, Barbara, 1995. “ ‘Gender Censorship’: On literary production in German Romanticism,” Women in German Yearbook 11: 81–97.
Cruea, Susan M., 2005. “Changing Ideals of Womanhood during the Nineteenth-Century Woman Movement,” in ATQ 19(3): 187-204.
DuBois, Ellen, 1975. “The Radicalism of the Woman Suffrage Movement: Notes Toward the Reconstruction of Nineteenth-Century Feminism,” Feminist Studies (3): 63–71.
Gordon, Linda and Ellen DuBois, 1983. “Seeking Ecstasy on the Battlefield: Danger and Pleasures in Nineteenth Century Feminist Sexual Thought,” Feminist Studies (9): 7–26.
McLaren, Angus, 1976. “Sex and Socialism: The Opposition of the French Lefts to Birth Control in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of the History of Ideas (37): 475–492.
Morantz-Sanchez-Regina, 2000. “Negotiating Power at the Bedside: Historical Perspectives on Nineteenth-Century Patients and Their Gynecologists,” Feminist Studies, 26(2): 287–309.
Pedersen, Joyce Senders, 1987. “Education, gender, and Social Change in Victorian Liberal Feminist Theory,” History of European Ideas, 8: 503–519.
Pettit, Clare, 2002. “An Everyday Story: Wives, Daughters and Nineteenth-Century Natural Science,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33C(2): 325–335.
Piper, Andrew, 2006. “The Making of Transnational Textual Communities: German Women Translators, 1800–1850,” Women in German Yearbook 22: 119–144.
Pollok, Anne, 2021. “Femininity and the Salon,” in Palgrave Handbook of German Romantic Philosophy, Elizabeth Millan (ed.), UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Polyakov, L. V., 1992. “Women’s Emancipation and the Theology of Sex in Nineteenth Century Russia,” Philosophy East and West, 42(2): 297–308.
Ray, Angela G., 2014. “Rhetoric and Feminism in the Nineteenth-Century United States,” in The Oxford Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, Michael J. MacDonald (ed.), Oxford UP.
Reynolds, Larry, 1995. “From Dial Essay to New York Book: The Making of Woman in the Nineteenth Century,” in Periodical Literature in Nineteenth-Century America, Kenneth M. Price and Susan Belasco Smith (eds.), Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Riot-Sarcey, Michele and Eleni Varikas, 1986. “Feminist Consciousness in the Nineteenth Century: The Consciousness of a Pariah?” Praxis International 5: 443–465.
Schafer, Sylvia, 1992. “When the Child is the Father of the Man: Work, Sexual Difference, and the Guardian-State in Third Republic France,” History and Theory, 31(4): 98–115.
Wilson, Linda, 1999. “Constrained by Zeal: Women in Mid-Nineteenth Century Nonconformist Churches,” The Journal of Religious History 23 (2): 185–202.
Wosk, Julie, 1993. “The ‘Electric Eve’: Galvanizing Women in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Art and Technology,” Research in Philosophy and Technology, 13: 43–56.

Topics – Pragmatism

Books

Hamington, Maurice and Celia Bardwell-Jones (eds.), 2012. Contemporary feminist pragmatism, New York: Routledge.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 1996. Pragmatism and feminism: Reweaving the social fabric, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sullivan, Shannon, 2001. Living Across and Through Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism, and Feminism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Articles

Capps, John, 1997. “Pragmatism, Feminism, and the Sameness-Difference Debate,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 32(1): 39–54.
Code, Lorraine, 1998. “Feminists and Pragmatists: A Radical Future?” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 87(January-February): 22–30.
Colapietro, Vincent, 2002. “Love and Death—and Other Somatic Transactions,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 17(4): 163–172.
Doak, Mary, 2003. “Feminism, Pragmatism, and Utopia: A Catholic Theological Response,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 24(1): 22–39.
Keith, Heather E., 1999. “Feminism and Pragmatism: George Herbert Mead’s Ethics of Care,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 35(2): 328–344.
Keith, Heather E., 2001. “Pornography Contextualized: A Test Case for a Feminist-Pragmatist Ethics,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 15(2): 122–136.
Knight Abowitz, Kathleen, 1999. “Reclaiming Community,” Educational Theory, 49(2): 143–159.
McKenna, Erin, 2003. “Pragmatism and Feminism: Engaged Philosophy,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 24(1): 3–21.
McReynolds, Phillip, 2002. “Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach: A Pragmatist Critique,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 16(2): 142–150.
Mesle, Barbara Hiles and C. Robert Mesle, 2003. “Tangled, Muddy, Painful, and Perplexed: Pragmatism, Feminism, and Life,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 24(1): 80–99.
Miller, Marjorie C., 1992. “Feminism and Pragmatism,” Monist, 75(4): 445–457
Miller, Marjorie C., 1991. “Response to Eugenie Gatens-Robinson, Marcia K. Moen, and Felicia E. Kruse,” in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 465–474.
Nelson, Julie A., 2001. “Value as Rationality: Feminist, Pragmatist, and Process Thought Meet Economics,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 15(20): 137–151.
Petrovich, Vesna Crnjanski, 1999. “Women and the Paris Academy of Sciences,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 32(3): 383–391.
Rooney, Phyllis, 1993. “Feminist-Pragmatist Revisionings of Reason, Knowledge, and Philosophy,” Hypatia, 8(2): 15–37.
Schultz, Bart, 1999. “Comment: The Private and Its Problems—Pragmatism, Pragmatist Feminism, and Homophobia,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29(2): 281–305.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 1991. “The Missing Perspective: Feminist Pragmatism,” in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 329–337.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 1994. “Validating Women’s Experience Pragmatically,” in Philosophy and the Reconstruction of Culture, John Stuhr (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 1998. “Pragmatism,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Siegfried, Charlene Haddock, 1998. “Perspectives on Pragmatism: A Reply to Lorraine Code,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 92: 25–27.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 2002. “Shedding Skins,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 17(4): 173–186.
Stone, Lynda, 1999. “Experience and Performance: Contrasting ‘Identity’ in Feminist Theorizings,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18(5): 327–337.
Sullivan, Shannon, 2002. “Pragmatist Feminism As Ecological Ontology: Reflections on Living Across and Through Skins,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 17(4): 201–217.
Thayer-Bacon, Barbara, 2003. “Pragmatism and Feminism as Qualified Relativism,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(6): 417–438.
Wagoner, Zandra, 2003. “A Pragmatic Feminist Ethic of Conflict,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 24(1): 61–79.
Whipps, Judy D., 2004. “Jane Addams’ Social Thought as a Model for a Pragmatist-Feminist Communitarianism,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(2): 118–133.

Topics – Transcendentalism

Argersinger, Jana and Phyllis Cole (eds.), 2004. Toward a Female Genealogy of Transcendentalism, Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Boller, Paul Jr., 1974. American Transcendentalism, 1830–1860: An Intellectual Inquiry, New York: Putnam.
Buell, Lawrence, 1973. Literary Transcendentalism: Style and Vision in the American Renaissance, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Fronthingham, Octavius Brooks, 1965. Transcendentalism in New England: A History, Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith.
Gura, Philip F., 2007. American Transcendentalism: A History, NY: Hill and Wang.
Parker, Theodore, 2000. “A Sermon of the Public Function of Woman, Preached at the Music Hall, March 27, 1853,” in Transcendentalism: A Reader, Joel Myerson (ed.), Oxford UP, 566–586.
Rose, Anne C., 1981. Transcendentalism as a Social Movement, 1830–1850, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wayne, Tiffany K. 2005. Women Thinking: Feminism and Transcendentalism in Nineteenth Century America, Lanham MD: Lexington UP.
Wayne, Tiffany K. 2006. Encyclopedia of Transcendentalism: The Essential Guide to the Lives and Works of Transcendentalist Writers. NY: Facts on File.
Zwarg, Christina, 1995. Feminist Conversations: Fuller, Emerson, and the Play of Reading, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Topics – Utilitarianism

Ball, Terence, 1980. “Utilitarianism, Feminism and the Franchise: James Mill and His Critics,” History of Political Thought, 1: 91–115.
Boralevi, Lea Campos, 1987. “Utilitarianism and Feminism,” in Women in Western Political Philosophy, Ellen Kennedy and Susan Mendus (eds.), Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Gardner, Catherine Villanueva, 2013. Empowerment and interconnectivity: Toward a feminist history of utilitarian philosophy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Jose, Jim, 2000. “Contesting Patrilineal Descent in Political Theory: James Mill and Nineteenth-Century Feminism,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(1): 151–174.
Miguel Alvarez, Ana de, 2001. “Aportiaciones a una reconstruccion del debate sobre la igualdad sexual en la tradicion utilitarista,” Telos: Revista Iberoamerica de Estudios Utilitaristas, 10(2): 21–36.
Schultz, Bart, 2000. “Sidgwick’s Feminism,” in Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies, 12(3): 379–401.
Williford, Miriram, 1975. “Bentham and the Rights of Women,” Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 167-176.

Topics – Marxism

Books

Aronson, Ronald, 1994. After Marxism, New York: Guilford.
Barrett, Michele, 1980. Women’s Oppression Today, London: Redwood Burn LTD.
Carver, Terrell and Paul Thomas (eds.), 1995. Rational Choice Marxism, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Cooke, Brett, George E. Slusser, and Jaume Marti-Olivella (eds.), 1998. The Fantastic Other: An Interface of Perspectives, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Ferguson, Kathy E., 1980. Self, Society, and Womankind: The Dialectic of Liberation, Wesport: Greenwood Press.
Gamble, Andrew, David Marsh, and Tony Tant (eds.), 1999. Marxism and Social Science, Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Gottlieb, Roger D. (ed.), 1989. An Anthology of Western Marxism, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hartsock, Nancy C. M., 1983. Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism, New York: Longman.
Hartsock, Nancy C.M., 1998. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays, Boulder: Westview Press.
Holub, Renate, 1992. Antonio Gramsci: Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism, New York: Routledge.
Messerschmidt, James W., 1986. Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Crime: Toward a Socialist Feminist Criminology, Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nordquist, Joan, 2000. Social Theory: A Bibliographic Series, No. 56—Marxism and Ecology: A Bibliography, Santa Cruz: Reference & Research.
Sayers, Janet, 1982. Biological Politics, London: Tavistock.
Sayers, Janet, Mary Evans, and Nenneke Redclift (eds.), 1987. Engels Revisited: New Feminist Essays, London: Travistock.
Stevernagel, Gertrude A., 1979. Political Philosophy as Therapy: Marcuse Reconsidered, Westport: Greenwood.
Vogel, Lise, 1983. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory, London: Pluto.

Articles

Alfaro Molina, Rocio, 2002. “Algunos aportes feministas a la teoria del estado,” Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 40(100): 119–123.
Aveling, Eleanor Marx and Edward Aveling, 1886. “The Woman Question: From a Socialist Point of View,” Westminster Review, 125.
Carling, Alan, 1995. “Rational Choice Marxism and Postmodern Feminism: Towards a More Meaningful Incomprehension,” in Rational Choice Marxism, Terrell Carver (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Carvel, Terrel, 1985. “Engels’ Feminism,” History of Political Thought, VI(3) (winter).
Cocks, Joan, 1990. “Cultural Theory Looks at Identity and Contradiction,” Quest, 38–60.
Dickenson, Donna L., 2001. “Property and Women’s Alienation from Their Own Reproductive Labor,” Bioethics, 15(3): 205–217.
Garcia Estebanez, Emilio, 2002. “Etica y sociologia en Estudioes Filosoficos,” Estudioes Filosoficos, 51(148): 479–487.
Gimenez, Martha E., 2000. “What’s Material about Materialist Feminism?: A Marxist Feminist Critique,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 101: 18–28.
Glass, Marvin and Ernie Thompson, 1994. “Reproduction for Money: Marxist Feminism and Surrogate Motherhood,” Nature, Society, and Thought, 7(3): 281–297.
Golat, Kelly F., 2003. “The Question of Equality: Mainstream Feminism Misses the Marxist Point,” Dialogue: Journal of Phi Sigma Tau, 43(2–3): 34–38.
Hartsock, Nancy C. M., 1995. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism,” in Feminism and Philosophy: Essential Readings in Theory, Reinterpretation, and Application, Boulder: Westview Press.
Haug, Frigga, 1996. “Entweder Geschlecht oder Arbeit—eine ratselhafte Disjunktion bei Engels,” Das Argument: Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften, 214(2): 239–245.
Hedman, Carl, 1987. “Ethics and Group Conflict: Between Marxism and Liberalism,” Radical Philosophy, 46: 8–15.
Jackson, Stevi, 1999. “Marxism and Feminism,” in Marxism and Social Science, Andrew Gamble, David Marsh, and Tony Tant (eds.), Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Jaggar, Alison, 1984. “Human Biology in Feminist Theory: Sexual Equality Reconsidered,” in Beyond Domination, Carol C. Gould (ed.), Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.
Jones, Kathleen B., 1988. “Socialist-Feminist Theories of the Family,” Praxis International, 8: 284–300.
Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli, 1999. “Flaschenpost und Tomate: Anmerkungen zur Frage einer Kritischen Theorie der Gegenwart,” Zeitschrift fuer Kritische Theorie 9: 103–119.
O’Brien, Mary, 1995. “Reproducing Marxist Man,” in Feminism and Philosophy: Essential Readings in Theory, Reinterpretation, and Application, Boulder: Westview Press.
Ousmanova, Almira, 2003. “On the Ruins of Orthodox Marxism: Gender and Cultural Studies in Eastern Europe,” Studies in East European Thought 55(1): 37–50.
Pasquinelli, Carla, 1984. “Beyond the Longest Revolution: The Impact of the Italian Women’s Movement on Cultural and Social Change,” Praxis International, 4: 131–136.
Schmitt, Richard, 1988. “Alienation and Autonomy,” Praxis International, 8: 222–236.
Schmitt, Richard, 1988. “A New Hypothesis about the Relations of Class, Race, and Gender: Capitalism as a Dependent System,” Social Theory and Practice, 14: 345–365.
Wendling, Amy, 2002. “Partial Liberations: The Machine, Gender, and High-Tech Culture,” International Studies in Philosophy, 34(2): 169–185.

Dorothea Schlegel (1764–1839)

Books

Schlegel, Dorothea, 1987. Florentin: Roman, Fragmente, Varianten, Liliane Weisberg (ed.), Berlin: Ullstein-Werkausgaben.
Stern, Carola, 1990. “Ich möchte mir Flügel wünschen”: Das Leben der Dorothea Schlegel, Reinbeck: Rowohlt.

Articles

Allingham, Liesl, 2011. “Revolutionizing Domesticity: Potentialities of Female Self-Definition in Dorothea Schlegel’s Florentin (1801),” Women in German Yearbook 27(1): 1–30.
Helfer, Martha B., 1996. “Dorothea Veit-Schlegel’s Florentin: Constructing a Feminist Romantic Aesthetic,” The German Quarterly 69 (2): 144–160.
Hillman, Susanne, 2006. “The Conversions of Dorothea Mendelssohn: Conviction or Convenience?” in German Studies Review 29 (1): 127–144.
Hundt, Ina, 1997. “Geselligkeit im Kreise von Dorothea und Friedrich Schlegel in Paris in den Jahren 1802–1804,” in Salons in der Romantik, Hartwig Schultz (ed.), Tübingen: Niemeyer, 83–133.
Kahn, Robert L., 1960. “Fifteen Letters from Friedrich und Dorothea Schlegel to J. G. Schweighäuser, Paris 1802 – 1804,” PMLA 75 (3): 197–215.
Pnevmonidou, Elena, 2005. “Die Absage an das romantische Ich: Dorothea Schlegels Florentin als Umschrift von Friedrich Schlegels Lucinde,” German Life and Letters 58 (3): 271–292.
Sassen, Brigitte, 2021. “Dorothea Schlegel and the Challenges of Female Authorship and Identity,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 179–194.
Stephan, Inge, 1991. “Weibliche und männliche Autorschaft: Zum Florentin von Dorothea Schlegel und zur Lucinde von Friedrich Schlegel,” in Wen kümmerts, wer spricht: Zur Literatur und Kulturgechichte von Frauen aus Ost und West, Inge Stephan et al. (eds.), Köln: Böhlau, 83–98.

G.W.F. Hegel (1770–1831)

Books

Hegel, G.W.F., 1973. The Philosophy of Right, T.M. Knox (trans), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunayevskaya, Raya, 2002. The Power of Negativity: Selected Writings on the Dialetic in Hegel and Marx, Kevin B. Anderson and Peter Hudis (eds.), New York: Lexington Books.
Dunayevskaya, Raya, 2003. Philosophy and Revolution: From Hegel to Sartre, and from Marx to Mao, Lanham Maryland: Lexington Books.
Gauthier, Jeffrey A., 1997. Hegel and Feminist Social Criticism: Justice, Recognition, and the Feminine, Albany: SUNY Press.
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz, 1996. Feminist Interpretations of G.W.F. Hegel, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz, 1987. Woman, Nature, and Psyche, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Articles

Armstrong, Susan, 1997. “A Feminist Reading of Hegel and Kierkegaard,” in Hegel, History, and Interpretation, Shaun Gallagher (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Arthur, Chris, 1988. “Hegel as Lord and Master,” Radical Philosophy, 50: 19–25.
Bauer, Nancy, 2001. “Being-with as Being-Against: Heidegger Meets Hegel in the Second Sex,” Continental Philosophy Review, 34(2): 129–149.
Blum, Lawrence, 1982. “Kant’s and Hegel’s Moral Rationalism: A Feminist Perspective,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12(2): 287–302.
Brace, Laura, 2002. “The Tragedy of the Freelance Hustler: Hegel, Gender and Civil Society,” Contemporary Political Theory, 1(3): 329–347.
Changfoot, Nadine, 2004. “Feminist Standpoint Theory, Hegel and the Dialectical Self: Shifting the Foundations,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 30(4): 477–502.
Changfoot, Nadine, 2002. “Hegel’s Antigone: A Response to the Feminist Critique,” Owl of Minerva, 33(2): 179–204.
DeBoer, Karin, 2003. “Hegel’s Antigone and the Dialectics of Sexual Difference,” Philosophy Today, (47): 140–146.
DeBoer, Karin, 2003. “Het onderbroken werk van de natuur: Hegels begrip van de seksuele differentie,” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor wijsbegeerte, 95(4): 237–249.
Deranty, Jean-Philippe, 2000. “The Son of Civil Society: Tensions in Hegel’s Account of Womanhood,” Philosophical Forum, 31(2): 145–162.
During, Lisabeth, 2000. “Catherine Malabou and the Currency of Hegelianism,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(4): 190–195.
Easton, Susan, 1984. “Hegel and Feminism,” Radical Philosophy, 38.
Easton, Susan, 1985. “Slavery and Freedom: A Feminist Reading of Hegel,” Politics, 5(2): 22–28.
Fuchs, Jo Ann Pilardi, 1986. “On the War Path and Beyond: Hegel, Freud, and Feminist Theory,” Hypatia, WSIF (1): 565–572.
Hayim, Gila J., 1990. “Hegel’s Critical Theory and Feminist Concerns,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 1–21.
Hodge, Joanna, 1987. “Women and the Hegelian State,” in Women in Western Political Philosophy, Ellen Kennedy and Susan Mendus (eds.), Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Holland, Nancy J., 1995. “Convergence on Whose Truth?: Feminist Philosophy and the ‘Masculine Intellect’ of Pragmatism,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 26(2): 170–183.
Hutchings, Kimberly, 2000. “Antigone: Toward a Hegelian Feminist Philosophy,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 41–42: 120–131.
Hutchings, Kimberly, 2003. “Hegel and Feminist Philosophy,” Res Publica: A Journal of Legal and Social Philosophy, 10:3.
James, Christine, 1997. “Hegel, Harding, and Objectivity,” Southwest Philosophy Review, 14(1): 111–122.
Kain, Philip J., 2002. “Hegel, Antigone, and Women,” Owl of Minerva, 33(2): 157–177.
LaMothe, Kimerer L., 2005. “Reason, Religion, and Sexual Difference: Resources for a Feminist Philosophy of Religion in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 20(1): 120–149.
Malabou, Catherine, 2000. “The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, Dialectic,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(4): 196–220.
Malabou, Catherine, 2001. “History and the Process of Mourning in Hegel and Freud,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 106: 15–20.
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz, 1979. “Hegel and ‘the Woman Question’: Recognition and Intersubjectivity,” in The Sexism of Social and Political Theory, L. Clark and L. Lange (eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz, 1986. “Hegel’s ‘Antigone’,” Owl of Minerva, (17): 131–152.
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz, 2002. “Hegel’s Anitgone Redux: Woman in Four Parts,” Owl of Minerva, 33(2): 205–221.
Oliver, Kelly, 1996. “Antigone’s Ghost: Undoing Hegel’s ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’,” Hypatia, 11(1): 67–90.
Parente, Alfredo, 1982. “Una Feminista che Esortava a Sputare su Hegel,” Riv. Stud. Croce, 19: 204–205.
Perez Estevez, Antonio, 1991. “Lo Femenino en la Filosofia del Derecho de Hegel,” Revista de Filosofio (15): 11–20.
Ravven, Heidi M., 1988. “Has Hegel Anything to Say to Feminists?,” Owl of Minerva, 19: 149–168.
Ravven, Heidi M., 1992. “A Response to ‘Why Feminists Should Take the ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’ Seriously,” Owl of Minerva, 24(1): 63–68.
Ravven, Heidi Miriam, 2002. “Further Thoughts on Hegel and Feminism: A Response to Philip J. Kain and Nadine Changfoot,” Owl and Minerva, 33(2): 223–231.
Rogers, Dorothy G., 1999. “Hegel, Women, and Hegelian Women on Matters of Public and Private,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18(4): 235–255.
Sembou, Evangelia, 2003. “Antigone and Lysistrata in G.W.F. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit,” Jahrbuch für Hegelforschung (8–9): 31–52.
Stone, Alison, 2002. “Feminist Criticisms and Reinterpretations of Hegel,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 45–46: 93–109.
Stone, Alison, 2003. “Hegel’s Dialectic and the Recognition of Feminine Difference,” Philosophy Today, 47: 132–139.
Swindle, Stuart, 1992. “Why Feminists Should Take the ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’ Seriously,” Owl of Minerva, 24(1): 41–54.

Rahel Varnhagen (1771–1833)

Books

Varnhagen, Rahel, 1833. Rahel. Ein Buch des Andenkens für ihre Freunde, Karl Ernst Varnhagen von Ense (ed.), Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Arendt, Hannah, 1997. Rahel Varnhagen. The Life of a Jewess, Liliane Weissberg (ed.), Richard and Clara Winston (trans.), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Scurla, Herbert, 1962. Rahel Varnhagen. Die große Frauengestalt der deutschen Romantik, Berlin: Claasen.
Thomann Tewarson, Heidi, 1998. Rahel Levin Varnhagen. The Life and Work of a German Jewish Intellectual, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Articles

Benhabib, Seyla, 1995. “The Pariah and her Shadow: Hannah Arendt’s Biography of Rahel Varnhagen,” Political Theory (23): 5–24.
Hahn, Barbara, 1997. “Der Mythos vom Salon: ‘Rahels Dachstube’ als historische Fiktion,” Salons in der Romantik, Hartwig Schultz (ed.), Tübingen: Niemeyer, 213–34.
Hahn, Barbara, 2004. “Rahel Varnhagen,” in New History of German Literature, David E. Wellbery et al. (eds.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 551–55.
Pollok, Anne, 2021. “The Role of Writing and Sociability for the Establishment of a Persona: Henriette Herz, Rahel Levin Varnhagen, and Bettina von Arnim,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195–212.

Charles Fourier (1772–1837)

Fourier, Charles. The Theory of the Four Movements. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Altman, Elizabeth C., 1976. “The Philosophical Bases of Feminism: The Feminist Doctrines of the Saint-Simonians and Charles Fourier,” Philosophical Forum (Boston), 7: 277–293.
Beecher, Jonathan, 1986. Charles Fourier: The visionary and his world, University of California Press.
Goldstein, Leslie F., 1982. “Early Feminist Themes in French Utopian Socialism: The St.-Simonians and Fourier,” in Journal of the History of Ideas, (1): 91–108.
Grogan, S.K., 1992. “Charles Fourier and the Nature of Women,” in French Socialism and Sexual Difference, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Sophie Germain (1776–1831)

Books

Bucciarelli, Louis L. and Nancy Dworsky, 1980. Sophie Germain: An Essay in the History of the Theory of Elasticity, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ornes, Stephen, 2008. Sophie Germain (Profiles in Mathematics), Morgan Reynolds Publishing.
Osen, Lynn, 1974. Women in Mathematics, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [see especially pp 83–94]

Articles

Cipra, Barry, 2008. “A Woman Who Counted,” Science, 319(5865): 899–899.
Del Centina, Andrea, 2008. “Unpublished manuscripts of Sophie Germain and a revaluation of her work on Fermat’s Last Theorem,” Archive for history of exact sciences, 62(4): 349–392.
Del Centina, Andrea and Alessandra Fiocca, 2012. “The correspondence between Sophie Germain and Carl Friedrich Gauss,” Archive for history of exact sciences, 66(6): 585–700.
Del Centina, Andrea, 2005. “Letters of Sophie Germain preserved in Florence,” Historia Mathematica, 32(1): 60–75.
Gray, Mary W, 2005. “Sophie Germain,” in Complexities: Women in Mathematics, Bettye Anne Case and Anne M. Leggett (eds.), United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
Mackinnon, Nick, 1990. “Sophie Germain: or was Gauss a feminist?” The Mathematical Gazette, 74(470): 346–351.
McGill, Sara Ann, 2000. “Sophie Germain,” History Remembers Scientists of the Past 9.
Moncrief, J. William, 2002. “Germain, Sophie,” in Mathematics Vol. 2, Barry Max Brandenberger Jr. (ed.), New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
Sampson, J H., 1990–91. “Sophie Germain and the Theory of Numbers,” Archive for History of Exact Science (41): 157–161.
Truesdell, C, 1991. “Sophie Germain: fame earned by stubborn error,” Bolletino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche, 11(2): 3–24.

Lady Mary Shepherd (1777–1847)

Books

Shepherd, Mary, 1824. An Essay Upon the Relation of Cause and Effect Controverting the Doctrine of Mr. Hume Concerning the Nature of that Relation; with Observations Upon the Opinions of Dr. Brown and Mr. Lawrence, Connected with the Same Subject, London: T. Hookham.
Shepherd, Mary, 1827. Essays on the Perception of an External Universe and Subjects Connected with the Doctrine of Causation, London: John Hatchard and Son.
Shepard, Lady Mary, 2000. Philosophical Works of Lady Mary Shepherd, J. Mc Robert (ed.), Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Boyle, Deborah (ed.), 2018. Lady Mary Shepherd: Selected Writings, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
LoLordo, Antonia, 2020. Mary Shepherd’s Essays on the Perception of an External Universe, New York: Oxford University Press.

Articles

Shepherd, Mary, 1832. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Metaphysics.” Fraser’s Magazine for Town and County.
Shepherd, Mary, 1828. “Observations on Mr. Fearn’s Lines of the Human Mind,” in Parriana: Or Notices of The Rev. Samuel Parr, L.L.D.
Shepherd, Mary, “On the Causes of Single and Erect Vision,” in The Philosophical Magazine and Annals of Philosophy.
Shepherd, Mary, 1828. “On the Causes of Single and Erect Vision,” The Kaleidoscope; or, Literary and Scientific Mirror, vol. 9 (420): 13, and vol. 9 (421): 22–23.
Atherton, Margaret, 1996. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case Against George Berkeley,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 4: 347–66.
Atherton, Margaret, 2005. “Reading Lady Mary Shepherd,” The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 13(2): 73–85.
Bolton, Martha, 2011. “Causality and Causal Induction: The Necessitarian Theory of Lady Mary Shepherd,” in Causation and Modern Philosophy, Keith Allen and Tom Stoneham (eds.), New York: Routledge, 242–261.
Bolton, Martha, 2019. “Lady Mary Shepherd and David Hume on Cause and Effect,” in Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, Eileen O’Neill and Marcy P. Lascano (eds.), Cham: Springer, 129–152.
Boyle, Deborah. 2017. “Expanding the Canon of Scottish Philosophy: The Case for Adding Lady Mary Shepherd,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 15 (3): 275–293.
Boyle, Deborah. 2020. “A Mistaken Attribution to Mary Shepherd,” Journal of Modern Philosophy 2 (1): 5.
Boyle, Deborah, 2020. “Mary Shepherd on Mind, Soul, and Self,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (1): 93–112.
Boyle, Deborah, 2020. “Mary Shepherd on the Meaning of ‘Life,’” in British Journal for the History of Philosophy special issue on Women Philosophers of the Nineteenth Century, 208–225.
Fantl, Jeremy, 2016. “Mary Shepherd on Causal Necessity,” Metaphysica 17 (1): 87–108.
Landy, David, 2020. “A Defense of Mary Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous,” Journal of Modern Philosophy 2 (1): 1–15.
LoLordo, Antonia, 2019. “Mary Shepherd on Causation, Induction, and Natural Kinds,” Philosophers’ Imprint 19 (52): 1–14.
McRobert, Jennifer, 2002. “Mary Shepherd and the Causal Relation.” Revised 2014. [available online].
Paoletti, Cristina, 2011. “Restoring Necessary Connections: Lady Mary Shepherd on Hume and the Early Nineteenth-Century Debate on Causality,” in Hume, Nuovi Saggi, Padova: Il Poligrafo, 47–59.
Rickless, Samuel C., 2018. “Is Shepherd’s Pen Mightier than Berkeley’s Word?” in British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (2): 317–330.
Waithe, Mary Ellen, 2004. “Canon Fodder: New Works by and about Women Philosophers,” Hypatia 19(2): 134–149.

Letters

***Letter from Mary Shepherd to Charles Babbage. British Library, Babbage Correspondence, MSS 37183, f. 204, 18 November 1825.
***Letter from Mary Shepherd to Charles Babbage. British Library. Babbage Correspondence, MSS 37201, 1832.
***Letter from Mary Shepherd to William Whewell. Trinity College, Cambridge. Papers of William Whewell (1794–1866) Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, Add. MS.a.21266, 1837.
***Letter from Mary Shepherd to William Whewell. Trinity College, Cambridge. Papers of William Whewell (1794–1866) Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, Add. MS.a.21266, 1838.
***Letter from Mary Shepherd to William Whewell. Trinity College, Cambridge. Papers of William Whewell (1794–1866) Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, Add.MS.a.21266, 1840.
***Letter from Shepherd to Whewell. Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge, Add.MS.a.212/66-68, n.d.

Karoline von Günderrode (1780–1806)

Books

Günderrode, Karoline von, 1990–1991. Sämtliche Werke und ausgewählte Studien. Historisch-Kritische Ausgabe, 3 vols., Walter Morgenthaler (ed.), Basel, Frankfurt am Main: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern.
Christmann, Ruth 2005. Zwischen Identitätsgewinn und Bewußtseinsverlust. Das philosophisch-literarische Werk der Karoline von Günderrode (1780–1806). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Dormann, Helga 2004. Die Kunst des inneren Sinns. Mythisierung der inneren und äußeren Natur im Werk Karoline von Günderrodes. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.
Lindemann, Anna 2010. Ästhetik und Konzeption einer romantischen Liebe: Karoline von Günderrode und Friedrich Creuzer. Wien: Sigmund-Freud-Privat-Universitäts-Verlag.
Obermeier, Karin 1995. Private Matters Made Public: Love and the Sexualized Body in Karoline von Günderrode’s Texts, unpublished doctoral thesis.
Weißenborn, Birgit (ed.). 1992 “Ich sende Dir ein zärtliches Pfand.” Die Briefe der Karoline von Günderrode. Frankfurt am Main: Insel.
Westphal, Wolfgang 1993. Karoline von Günderrode und “Naturdenken um 1800, Essen: Die Blaue Eule.

Articles

Becker-Cantarino, Barbara 2010. ”The ‘New Mythology’: Myth and Death in Karoline von Günderrode’s Literary Work,“ in Women and Death 3: Women’s representations of death in German culture since 1500, Clare Bielby and Anna Richards (eds.), Rochester, NY: Camden House, 51–70.
Burdorf, Dieter von 1993. ”Diese Sehnsucht ist ein Gedanke, der ins Unendliche starrt. Über Karoline von Günderrode – aus Anlaß neuer Ausgaben ihrer Werke und Briefe,“ in: Wirkendes Wort 43 (1): 49–67.
Burwick, Roswitha 1980. ”Liebe und Tod in Leben und Werk der Günderode,” German Studies Review 3 (2): 207–223.
Ezekiel, Anna C. 2016. ”Introduction to Piedro, The Pilgrims, and The Kiss in the Dream”, in Karoline von Günderrode, Poetic Fragments, 87–105. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Foldenauer, Karl 1981. ”Karoline von Günderrode (1780–1906),” in Kostbarkeiten. Essays und Laudationes zur Literatur des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, 81–111.
Hopp, Doris and Max Preitz, 1975. ”Karoline von Günderrode in ihrer Umwelt. III. Karoline von Günderrode’s “Studienbuch,” in Jahrbuch des Freien Deutschen Hochstifts, 223–323.
Preitz, Max, 1962. “Karoline von Günderrode in ihrer Umwelt. I. Briefe von Lisette und Christian Gottfried Nees von Esenbeck, Karoline von Günderrode, Friedrich Creuzer, Clemens Brentano und Susanne von Heyden,” in Jahrbuch des Freien Deutschen Hochstifts, 208–306.
Preitz, Max, 1964. “Karoline von Günderrode in ihrer Umwelt. II. Karoline von Günderrodes Briefwechsel mit Friedrich Karl und Gunda von Savigny,” in Jahrbuch des Freien Deutschen Hochstifts, 158–235.

Anna Doyle Wheeler (1785–1848)

Wheeler, Anna Doyle, and William Thompson, 1825. Appeal of One Half the Human Race, Women, Against the Pretensions of the Other Half, Men, To Retain Them in Political and Thence in Civil and Domestic Slavery; In Reply to a Paragraph of Mr. Mill’s Celebrated “Article On Government,” London: Longman.
Wheeler, Anna Doyle, 1830. “Rights of women,” The British Co-operator (1): 12–15, 33–36.
Dooley, Dolores, 1996. Equality in community: Sexual equality in the writings of William Thompson and Anna Doyle Wheeler, Cork: Cork University Press.
McFadden, Margaret, 1996. “Anna Doyle Wheeler (1785–1848), philosopher, socialist, feminist,” in Hypatia’s daughters: fifteen hundred years of women philosophers, Linda López McAlister (ed.), Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 204–214.
Pankhurst, Richard, 1954. “Anna Wheeler: A pioneer socialist and feminist,” The Political Quarterly (25): 132–143.
Waithe, Mary Ellen, 1991. “Anna Doyle Wheeler,” in A history of women philosophers. Modern women philosophers, 1600–1900, Mary Ellen Waithe (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer, 230–235.

Bettina von Arnim (1785–1859)

Books

Arnim, Bettina von, 1999. Goethe’s Briefwechsel mit einem Kinde. Heinz Härtl (ed.), Berlin: Aufbau.
Bäumer, Konstanze, 1986. Bettine, Psyche, Mignon: Bettina von Arnim und Goethe, Stuttgart: Heinz.
Bäumer, Konstanze and Hartwig Schultz, 1995. Bettina von Arnim, Stuttgart: Metzler.
Böttger, Fritz, 1990. Bettina von Arnim: Ihr Leben, ihre Begegnungen, ihre Zeit, Bern: Scherz.

Articles

Bäumer, Konstanze, 1987. “Die Rezeption Bettina von Arnims in der Berliner Kultur-und Literaturgeschichte,” in Jahrbuch Bettina von Arnim Studien 1, Berlin: Saint Albin, 39–51.
Pollok, Anne, 2021. “The Role of Writing and Sociability for the Establishment of a Persona: Henriette Herz, Rahel Levin Varnhagen, and Bettina von Arnim,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195–212.
Schmitz, Walter, 1989. “Bettine von Arnims Lebensrollen. Zur Sozialgeschichte einer Schriftstellerin in der Biedermeierzeit,” in “Der Geist muß Freiheit genießen…!” Studien zu Werk und Bildungsprogramm Bettine von Arnims (Vol. 2 of Bettina von Arnim Studien), Walter Schmitz and Sibylle von Steinsdorff (eds.) Berlin: Saint Albin, 1–25.
Schormann, Sabine, 1989. “Was ich nur ahndete, das machte er mir zur Gewißheit. Zur Freundschaft Bettines mit Friedrich Schleiermacher,” in “Der Geist muß Freiheit genießen…!” Studien zu Werk und Bildungsprogramm Bettine von Arnims (Vol. 2 of Bettina von Arnim Studien), Walter Schmitz and Sibylle von Steinsdorff (eds.), Berlin: Saint Albin, 106–126.
Schormann, Sabine, 1993. Bettina von Arnim. Die Bedeutung Schleiermachers für ihr Leben und Werk, Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Schultz, Hartwig, 2004. ‘Unsre Lieb aber ist außerkohren’. Die Geschichte der Geschwister Clemens und Bettine Brentanto, Frankfurt a.M./Leipzig: Insel.
Shafi, Monika, 1995. “The Myth of Psyche as Developmental Paradigm in Bettina Brentano-von Arnim’s Epistolary Novel,” in Bettina Brentano-von Arnim: Gender and Politics, Elke P. Frederiksen and Katherine R. Goodman (eds.), Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 95–114.
Wolf, Christa, 1983. “ ‘Nun ja! Das nächste Leben geht aber heute an.’ Ein Brief über Bettine,” in Bettine von Arnim, Die Günderode, mit einem Essay von Christa Wolf, Leipzig: Insel, 545–584.

Frances Wright (1795–1852)

Wright, Frances, 1823. Views of Society and Manners in America in a series of Letters from That Country to a Friend in England during the Years 1818, 1819, and 1820, London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orne and Brown.
Wright, Frances, 1829. Course of Popular Lectures, NY: Office of Free Enquirer.
Wright, Frances, 1848. England the Civilizer, London: Simpkin, Marshall.
Wright, Frances, 1972. Life, Letters and Lectures: 1834–1844, NY: Arno Press.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, 2005. “Theory Emergent from Practice: The Rhetorical Theory of Frances Wright,” in Theoretical Women: Roles and Representations, Hildy Miller and Lillian Bridwell-Bowles (eds.), Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 125–141.
Eckhardt, Celia Morris, 1984. Fanny Wright, Rebel in America, London: Harvard UP.
Kissel, S.S., 1993. Common Cause: The ‘conservative’ Frances Trollope and the ‘radical’ Frances Wright, Bowling Green, Ohio.
Perkins, A.J.G. and Theresa Wolfson, 1939. Frances Wright: Free Enquirer. London: Harper & Harper.

Catharine Beecher (1800–1878)

Books

Beecher, Catharine E., 1831. Elements of Mental and Moral Philosophy founded upon Experience, Reason, and the Bible, Hartford: Peter Gleason and Co. (privately published).
Beecher, Catharine E., 1836. Letters on the Difficulties of Religion, Hartford: Belknap & Hamersley.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1840. To those Commencing a Religious Life, NY: American Tract Society.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1845. The Duty of American Women to Their Country, NY: Harper & Brothers.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1846. The Evils Suffered by American Women and American Children: The Causes and the Remedy, NY: Harper & Brothers.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1849. Letter to Benevolent Ladies, Hartford, CT.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1851. True Remedy for the Wrongs of Woman with a History of an Enterprise having that for its Object, Boston: Phillips, Sampson, & Co.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1857. Common Sense Applied to Religion; Or The Bible and the People, NY: Harper & Brothers.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1871. Woman Suffrage and Woman’s Profession, Hartford: Brown & Gross.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1872. Woman’s Profession as Mother and Educator, with Views in Opposition to Woman Suffrage, NY: Maclean, Gibson & Co.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1874. Educational Reminiscences and Suggestions, NY: J.B. Ford.
Beecher, Catharine E., 2002. The Social, Political and Philosophical Works of Catharine Beecher, 6 vols., Dykeman, Therese B. and Dorothy Rogers (eds.), Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.
Grimké, Angelina, 1969. Letters to Catharine E. Beecher, NY: Arno Press.
Harveson, Elizabeth Mae, 1932. Catharine Esther Beecher: Pioneer Educator, Philadelphia: Science Press.
Sklar, Katherine Kish, 1973. Catharine Beecher: A Study in American Domesticity, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.

Articles

Beecher, Catharine E., 1839. “An Essay on Cause and Effect in Connection with the Difference of Fatalism and Free Will,” Biblical Repository 2 (4): 382–408.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1870. “Address on Female Suffrage in 1871,” in Woman’s Profession as Mother and Educator, with Views in Opposition to Woman Suffrage, Hartford, Brown and Gross.
Beecher, Catharine E., 1871. “Anti-Suffrage Petition,” in Godey’s Lady’s Book, Vol. 82, No. 491, Sarah Hale (ed.), 462–67.
Gardner, Catherine Villanueva, 2004. “Heaven-Appointed Educators of Mind: Catharine Beecher and the Moral Power of Women,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(2): 1–16.
Hall, Mark David, 2000. “Catharine Beecher: America’s First Female Philosopher and Theologian,” Fides et Historia, Vol. XXXII, (1): 65–80.

Lydia Maria Child (1802–1880)

Child, Lydia Maria, 1833. An Appeal in Favor of that Class of Americans Called Africans, Boston: Allen and Ticknor.
Child, Lydia Maria, 1833. Good Wives, Boston: Allen and Ticknor.
Child, Lydia Maria, 1835. The History of the Condition of Women, in Various Ages and Nations, Boston: John Allen.
Child, Lydia Maria, 1839. The American Frugal Housewife: For Those who are not Ashamed of Economy, New York: Samuel S. and William Wood.
Child, Lydia Maria, 1860. The Duty of Disobedience to the Fugitive Slave Act. An Appeael to the Legislators of Massachussets, Boston: American Anti-Slavery Association.
Child, Lydia Maria, 1965. The Freedmen’s Book, Boston: Ticknor and Fields.
Child, Lydia Maria, 1982. Lydia Maria Child: Selected Letters, 1817–1880, Milton Meltzer et al. (eds.), Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Child, Lydia Maria, 1998. Letters from New York, Bruce Mills (ed.), Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Karcher, Carolyn, 1994. The First Woman of the Republic: A Cultural Biography of Lydia Maria Child, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Lord, Susan Toth, 2004. Extraordinary Women All: The Influence of Madame de Staël on Margaret Fuller and Lydia Maria Child, Kent State University, unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
Moland, Lydia L., 2021. “Is She not an Unusual Woman? Say More: Germaine de Staël and Lydia Maria Child on Progress, Art, and Abolition,” in Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Corey W. Dyck (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–233.
Pratt, Scott L., 2004. “Rebuilding Babylon: The Pluralism of Lydia Maria Child,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(2): 92–104.

John Stuart Mill (1806–1873)

Books

Mill, John Stuart, 1870. The Subjection of Women. London: Longman’s.
Himmelfarb, Gertrude, 1974. On Liberty and Liberalism: The case of John Stuart Mill, New York: Knopf.
Morales, Maria H., 1996. Perfect Equality: John Stuart Mill on Well-Constituted Communities, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Murphy, Peter F., 2004. Feminism and Masculinities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pappe, H. O., 1962. John Stuart Mill and the Harriet Taylor Myth, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pyle, Andrew, 1995. The Subjection of Women: Contemporary Responses to John Stuart Mill. London: Thoemmes Press.

Articles

Annas, Julia, 1977. “Mill and the Subjection of Women,” Philosophy, 52: 179–194.
Brecher, Bob, 1993. “Why Patronize Feminists? A reply to Stove on Mill,” Philosophy, 68(265): 397–400.
Brown, D.G., 1998. “Stove’s Reading of Mill,” Utlitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies, 10(1): 122–126.
Burgess, Jackson Keith, 1995. “John Stuart Mill, Radical Feminist,” Social Theory and Practice, 21(3): 389–396.
Donner, Wendy, 1993. “John Stuart Mill’s Liberal Feminism,” Philosophical Studies, 69(2–3): 155–166.
Dyzanhaus, David, 1992. “John Staurt Mill and the Harm of Pornography,” Ethics, 102(3): 534–551.
Goldstein, Leslie, 1980. “Mill, Marx, and Women’s Liberation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, XVIII(3) (July).
Hornsby, Jennifer and Rae Langton, 1998. “Free Speech and Illocution,” Legal Theory, 4(1): 21–37.
Howes, John, 1986. “Mill on Women and Human Development,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Supp. 64: 66–74.
Mann, Hollie, and Jeff Spinner-Halev, 2010. “John Stuart Mill’s Feminism: On Progress, the State, and the Path to Justice,” Polity, 42(2): 244–70.
Mendus, Susan, 1994. “John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor on Women and Marriage,” Utilitas, 6(2): 287–299.
Nubiola, Jaime, 1994. “Emancipacion, magnanimidad y mujeres,” Anuario Filosofico, 27(2): 641–654.
Robson, John M., 1977. “’Feminine’ and ‘Masculine’: Mill vs. Grote,” Mill Newsletter, (12): 18–22.
Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 1981. “Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mills’ ‘The Subjection of Women,” Political Theory, 9: 229–247.
Skipper, Robert, 1993. “Mill and Pornography,” Ethics, 103(4): 726–730.
Smith, G.W., 2000. “J.S. Mill on What We Don’t Know about Women,” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies, 12(1): 41–61.
Tulloch, Gail, 1989. “Mill’s Epistemology in Practice in His Liberal Feminism,” Educational Philosophy and Theory, 21(2): 32–39.
Williams, Reginald M., 2005. “Affirmative Action, the May the Best Person Win Intuition, and Mill’s The Subjection of Women,” Public Affairs Quarterly, 19(1): 65–80.

Harriet Taylor Mill (1807–1858)

Books

Mill, Harriet Taylor, 1998. The Complete Works of Harriet Taylor Mill, Jo Ellen Jacobs (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Jacobs, Jo Ellen 2002. The Voice of Harriet Taylor Mill, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 33–37, 245–254.
Robson, Ann P. and John M. Robson (eds.), 1994. Sexual Equality: Writings by John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill, and Helen Taylor, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Articles

Hayek, F. A., 2015. “John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their Friendship and Subsequent Marriage,” in Hayek on Mill: The Mill-Taylor Friendship and Related Writings, Sandra J. Peart (ed.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 57–72.
Krouse, Richard W., 1982. “Patriarchal Liberalism and Beyond: From John Stuart Mill to Harriet Taylor,” in The Family in Political Thought, Jean Bethke Elshtain (ed.), Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
McCabe, Helen, 2017. “Harriet Taylor Mill,” in A Companion to Mill, Christopher MacLeod and Dale E. Miller (eds.), Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 112–125.
Mendus, Susan, 1994. “John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor on Women and Marriage,” Utilitas 6 (2): 287–299.
Pugh, Evelyn, 1978. “John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor, and Women’s Rights in America, 1850–1873,” Canadian Journal of History (13): 423–442.
Smits, Katherine, 2018. “ ‘Family Selfishness’ and the Corruption of Public Virtue: Harriet Taylor Mill’s Enfranchisement of Women,” in Democratic Moments: Reading Democratic Texts, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 121–128.

Charles Darwin (1809–1882)

Deutscher, Penelope, 2004. “The Descent of Man and the Evolution of Woman,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(2): 35–55.
Gates, Barbara T., 1994. “Revisioning Darwin, with Sympathy,” History of European Ideas, 19(4–6): 761–768.
Sayers, Janet, 1982. Biological Politics, London: Tavistock.
Richards, Evelleen, 1983. “Darwin and the Descent of Women,” in The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Thought, David Oldroyd (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel.

Margaret Fuller (1810–1850)

Books

Fuller, Margaret, 1852. Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli, Boston: Phillips, Sampson and Company.
Fuller, Margaret, 1941. The Writings of Margaret Fuller, Mason Wade (ed.), NY: Viking Press.
Fuller, Margaret, 1968. Woman in the Nineteenth Century, and kindred Papers Relating to the Sphere, Condition, and Duties of Woman, NY: Greenwood.
Fuller, Margaret, 1978. Essays on American Life and Letters, Joel Myerson (ed.), New Haven: College and University Press.
Fuller, Margaret, 1984. The Letters of Margaret Fuller, 6 vols., Robert Hudspeth (ed.), Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Fuller, Margaret, 1992. The Essential Margaret Fuller, Jeffrey Steele, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Allen, Margaret Vanderhaar, 1979. The Achievement of Margaret Fuller, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Blanchard, Paula, 1978. Margaret Fuller: From Transcendentalism to Revolution, NY: Delacorte Press.
Capper, Charles, 1992. Margaret Fuller: An American Romantic Life, Oxford UP.
Fleischmann, Fritz (ed.), 2000. Margaret Fuller’s Cultural Critique: Her Age and Legacy, NY: Lang.
Dickenson, Donna, 1993. Margaret Fuller: Writing a Woman’s Life, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Articles

Fuller, Margaret, 1842. “Bettine Brentano and Her Friend Gunderode,” in Dial 2.
Adams, Kimberly Vanesveld, 1996. “The Madonna and Margaret Fuller,” Women’s Studies 25 (4).
Capper, Charles, 1987. “Margaret Fuller as Cultural Reformer: The Conversations in Boston,” American Quarterly 39 (4): 509–528.
Crouse, Jamie S., 2005. “ ‘If They Have a Moral Power’ Margaret Fuller, Transcendentalism, and the Question of Woman’s Moral Nature,” ATQ 19(4):259-279.
Garvey, Gregory T. “Margaret Fuller’s Women in the Nineteenth Century and the Rhetoric of Social Reform in the 1840’s,” ESQ (47): 113–133.
Kolodny, Annette, 1994. “Inventing a Feminist Discourse: Rhetoric and Resistance in Margaret Fuller’s Woman in the Nineteenth Century,” New Literary History 25 (2): 355–382.
Mehren, Joan von, 1994. Minerva and the Muse: A Life of Margaret Fuller, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Miller, Perry, 1963. Margaret Fuller: American Romantic, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Robinson, David M., 1982. “Margaret Fuller and the Transcendental Ethos: Women in the Nineteenth Century,” PMLA 97 (1): 83–98.
Zwarg, Christina, 1995. Feminist Conversations: Fuller, Emerson, and the Play of Reading, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855)

Agacinski, Sylviane, 2002. “We Are Not Sublime: Love and Sacrifice, Abraham and Ourselves,” in Feminism and History of Philosophy, Genevieve Lloyd (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, Susan, 1997. “A Feminist Reading of Hegel and Kierkegaard,” in Hegel, History, and Interpretation, Shaun Gallagher (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Berry, Wanda Warren, 1995. “Kierkegaard and Feminism: Apologetic, Repetition, and Dialogue in Kierkegaard,” in Post/Modernity, Martin J. Matustik (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Cahoy, William J., 1995. “One Species or Two: Kierkegaard’s Anthropology and the Feminist Critique of the Concept of Sin,” Modern Theology, 11(4): 429–454.
De Lacoste, Guillermine, 2002. “A Feminist Interpretation of the Leaps in Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling,” Philosophy Today, 46(1): 3–15.
Howe, Leslie A., 1994. “Kierkegaard and the Feminine Self,” Hypatia, 9(4): 131–157.
Leon, Celine, 2000. “Can a Woman Be Kept? The Meaning of Repetition’s Repetitions,” Kierkegaard Studies: Yearbook 2002, 61–77.
Leon, Celine, 2000. “The (In-)Appropriateness of Using the Feminine as Paradigm: The Case of Kierkegaard,” Philosophy Today, 44(4): 339–346.
Leon, Celine and Sylvia Walsh (eds.), 1997. Feminist Interpretations of Soren Kierkegaard, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Makarushka, Irena, 1992. “Reflections on the ‘Other’ in Dineson, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche,” in Kierkegaard on Art and Communication, George Pattison (ed.), New York: St. Martin’s Press.
McBride, William L., 1995. “Sartre’s Debts to Kierkegaard: A Partial Reckoning,” in Post/Modernity, Martin J. Matustik (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Walsh, Sylvia I., 1987. “On ‘Feminine’ and ‘Masculine’ Forms of Despair,” in The Sickness Unto Death, Robert L. Perkins (ed.), Macon: Mercer University Press.
Walsh, Sylvia I., 1997. “Subjectivity versus Objectivity: Kierkegaard’s ‘Postscript’ and Feminist Epistemology,” in International Kierkegaard Commentary, Robert L. Perkins (ed.), Macon: Mercer University Press.
Walsh, Sylvia, 1998. “Feminine Devotion and Self-Abandonment: Simone de Beauvoir and Soren Kierkegaard on the Woman in Love,” Philosophy Today, 42(suppl.): 35–40.
Walsh, Sylvia, 2000. “When That Single Individual Is a Woman,” Kierkegaard Studies: Yearbook 2000, 1–18.

Karl Marx (1818–1883)

Books

Dunayevskaya, Raya, 2003. Philosophy and Revolution: From Hegel to Sartre, and from Marx to Mao, Lanham MD: Lexington Books.
Dunayevskaya, Raya, 2002. The Power of Negativity: Selected Writings on the Dialectic in Hegel and Marx, Kevin B. Anderson and Peter Hudis (eds), New York: Lexington Books.
Kain, Philip J., 1993. Marx and Modern Political Theory, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, Chapter 7.

Articles

Bologh, Roslyn Wallach, 1987. “Marx, Weber, and Masculine Theorizing: A Feminist Analysis,” in The Marx-Weber Debate, Norbert Wiley (ed.), Newbury Park: Sage.
Dunayevskaya, Raya, 1984. “Marx’s ‘New Humanism’ and the Dialectics of Women’s Liberation in Primitive and Modern Societies,” in Praxis International, 3(4).
Goldstein, Leslie, 1980. “Mill, Marx, and Women’s Liberation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy. XVIII(3) (July).
Held, Virginia, 1976. “Marx, Sex, and the Transformation of Society,” The Philosophical Forum, 5(1–2) (1973–1974), 168–184; Reprinted in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Henderson, Janet, 1989. “An Eco-Feminist Critique of Marx,” Dialogue (PST), 31: 58–64.
Kain, Philip J., 1993. “Marx, Housework, and Alienation,” Hypatia, 8(1): 121–144.
Kain, Philip J., 1992. “Modern Feminism and Marx,” Studies in Soviet Thought, 44(3): 159–192.
Nicholson, Linda, 1986. “Feminism and Marx: Integrating Kinship with the Economic,” Praxis International, 5: 367–380.

Frances Power Cobbe (1822–1904)

Books

Cobbe, Frances Power, 1864. An essay on intuitive morals, London: Trübner.
Cobbe, Frances Power, 1882. The peak in Darien, with some other inquiries touching concerns of the soul and the body. An Octave of Essays, London: Williams & Norgate, 125–150.
Cobbe, Frances Power, 2004. Animal welfare and anti-vivisection, 1870-1910, S. Hamilton (ed.), London: Routledge.
Donald, Diana, 2019. Women against cruelty: Protection of animals in nineteenth-century Britain, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 196–198.
Evans, Samantha (ed.), 2017. Darwin and women: A selection of letters, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, Sally, 2004. Frances Power Cobbe: Victorian Feminist, Journalist, Reformer, Charlottesville VA: University of Virginia Press, 310–311.
Peacock, Sandra J., 2002. The theological and ethical writings of Frances Power Cobbe, 1822–1904, Lewiston CA: Edwin Mellen.

Articles

Cobbe, Frances Power, 1863. “The rights of man and the claims of brutes,” Fraser’s magazine 68: 586–602.
Cobbe, Frances Power, 1871. “Darwinism in morals,” Theological review 9: 167–192.
Cobbe, Frances Power, 1882. “Magnanimous atheism,” The peak in Darien, with some other inquiries touching concerns of the soul and the body, London: Williams & Norgate, 11–76.
Cobbe, Frances Power, 1883. “Agnostic morality,” Contemporary Review 43: 783–794.
Cobbe, Frances Power, 1884. “A faithless world,” Contemporary Review, vol. 46: 795–810.
Besant, Annie, 1885. A world without God: A reply to Miss Francis Power Cobbe. London: Freethought Publishing.
Carvalho, André Luis de Lima and Ricardo Waizbort, 2010. “Pain beyond the confines of man: A preliminary introduction to the debate between Frances Power Cobbe and the darwinists with respect to vivisection in Victorian England (1863–1904),” História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 17 (3) [available online].
Harvey, Joy, 2009. “Darwin’s ‘angels’: The women correspondents of Charles Darwin,” Intellectual History Review 19 (2): 197–210.
O’Connor, Maureen, 2005. “Frances Power Cobbe and the patriarchs,” in Evangelicals and Catholics in Nineteenth-century Ireland, J.M. Murphy (ed.), Dublin: Four Courts Press, 187–196.

Ednah Dow Cheney (1824–1904)

Cheney, Ednah Dow, 1871. “The Next Step in Popular Education—Labor Schools,” The Radical 8: 1–19.
Cheney, Ednah Dow, 1881. Gleanings in the Fields of Art. Boston: Lee & Shepard.
Cheney, Ednah Dow, 1882. Concord Lectures on Philosophy With an Historic Sketch. Recorded in Scrapbook-Concord Memorial Library.
Cheney, Ednah Dow, 1885. The Woman’s Journal (November 16).
Cheney, Ednah Dow, 1891 “Woman in Philanthropy – Care of the Sick,” in Annie Meyer (ed.), Women’s Work in America, NY: Henry Holt, 346–358.
Cheney, Ednah Dow, 1902. Reminiscences, Boston: Lee & Shepard.
Dykeman, Therese Boos, 2000. “Ednah Dow Cheney’s American Aesthetics,” in Tougas, Cecile T. & Ebenreck, Sara (eds.): Presenting Women Philosophers. Philadelphia: Temple UP.
Dykeman, Therese Boos, 2017. “Vernon Lee and Ednah Dow Cheney: Aesthetics, Art, and Affect,” in Les femmes et la pensée politique: Vernon Lee et les cercles radicaux. Women and Political Theory: Vernon Lee and Radical Circles, Paris: Michel Houdiard Éditeur.
Shakir, Evelyn, 1980. “Ednah Dow Cheney: ‘Jack of All Trades’,” American Transcendental Quarterly (Summer-Fall), 47–48, 95–115.

Antoinette Brown Blackwell (1825–1921)

Blackwell, Antoinette Brown, 1869. Studies in General Science, NY: G.P. Putnam.
Blackwell, Antoinette Brown, 1875. The Sexes Throughout Nature, NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 11–137.
Blackwell, Antoinette Brown, 1875. The Physical Basis of Immortality, NY: G.P. Putnam.
Blackwell, Antoinette Brown, 1893. The Philosophy of Individuality; or the One and the Many, NY: G. P. Putnam.
Blackwell, Antoinette Brown, 1914. The Making of the Universe, Boston: Gorham.
Blackwell, Antoinette Brown, 1915. The Social Side of Mind and Action, NY: Neale.
Cazden, Elizabeth, 1983. Antoinette Brown Blackwell, Old Westbury, NY: The Feminist Press.
Murphy, Julien S., 1991. “Antoinette Brown Blackwell,” in A History of Women Philosophers 1600–1900, vol. 3., Waithe, Mary Ellen (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer.

Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914)

Ayim, Maryann, 1983. “The Implications of Sexually Stereotypic Language as Seen Through Peirce’s Theory of Signs,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 19: 183–198.
Chopp, Rebecca S., 1995. “Feminist Queries and Metaphysical Musings,” Modern Theology, 11(1): 47–63.
Moen, Marcia K., 1991. “Peirce’s Pragmatism as a Resource for Feminism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 435–450.
Sharp, Ann Margaret, 1994. “Peirce, Feminism, and Philosophy for Children,” in Children: Thinking and Philosophy, Daniela G. Camhy (ed.), Sankt Augustin: Academia.
Thayer-Bacon, Barbara, 2005. “Peirce on Education: Discussion of Peirce’s Definition of a University,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 24(3–4): 317–325.

William James (1842–1910)

James, V. Denise, 2013. “Reading Anna J. Cooper with William James: black feminist visionary pragmatism, philosophy’s culture of justification, and belief”, The Pluralist, 8(3): 32–45.
Tarver, Erin C. and Shannon Sullivan (eds.), 2015, Feminist Interpretations of William James, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)

Books

Graybeal, Jean, 1990. “Language and ‘The Feminine’,” in Nietzsche and Heidegger, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Irigaray, Luce, 1991. Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche, Gillian C. Gill (trans.), New York: Columbia University Press.
Oliver, Kelly and Marilyn Pearsall (eds.), 1998. Feminist Interpretations of Friedrich Nietzsche, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Perez Estevez, Antonio, 1989. El individuo y la feminidad, Zulia: University of Zulia.
Picart, Carline Joan S., 2002. Resentment and the ‘Feminine’ in Nietzsche’s Politico-Aesthetics, University Park: Penn State University Press.
Schutte, Ofelia, 1984. Beyond Nihilism: Nietzsche Without Masks, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wolfenstein, Eugene Victor, 2002. Inside/Outside Nietzsche: Psychoanalytic Explorations, Cornell University Press.

Articles

Ainley, Alison, 1988. “Ideal Selfishness: Nietzsche’s Metaphor of Maternity,” in Exceedingly Nietzsche, David Farrell Krell (ed.), London: Routledge and K. Paul.
Alcoff, Linda Martin, 2004. “Schutte’s Nietzschean Postcolonial Politics,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(3): 144–156.
Babich, Babette E., 2000. “Nietzsche and Eros between the Devil and God’s Deep Blue Sea: The Problem of the Artist As Actor-Jew-Woman,” Continental Philosophy Review, 33(2): 159–188.
Bach, Craig N., 2001. “Nietzsche and the Big Sleep: Style, Women and Truth,” Film and Philosophy, 5–6: 45–59.
Behler, Diana, 1993. “Nietzsche and Postfeminism,” Nietzsche Studien, 22: 355–370.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 1989. “On the Advantage and Disadvantage of Nietzsche for Women,” in The Question of the Other, Arleen B. Dallery (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 1994. “Nietzsche Was No Feminist…” in International Studies in Philosophy, 26(3): 23–31.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 2004. “Engaging Nietzsche’s Women: Ofelia Schutte and the Madres de la Plaza de Mayo,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(3): 157–168.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 2002. “Nietzsche’s Existential Signatures,” International Studies in Philosophy, 34(3): 83–93.
Bertram, Maryanne J., 1981. “’God’s ‘Second’ Blunder’ – Serpent Woman and the ‘Gestalt’ in Nietzsche’s Thought,” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 19: 259–278.
Booth, David, 1991. “Nietzsche’s ‘Woman’ Rhetoric,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 8(3): 311–325.
Brown, Kristen, 1999. “Possible and Questionable: Opening Nietzsche’s Genealogy to Feminine Body,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(3): 39–58.
Carley, Craig, 1999. “Nietzsche’s Misogyny: A Class Action Suit,” Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society: A Report on Philosophy and Criticism of the Arts and Sciences, 19: 18–30.
Clark, Maudemarie, 1994. “Nietzsche’s Misogyny,” International Studies in Philosophy, 26(3): 3–12.
Deutscher, Penelope, 2002. “‘Is It Not Remarkable that Nietzsche…Should Have Hated Rousseau?’ Woman, Femininity: Distancing Nietzsche from Rousseau,” in Feminism and History of Philosophy, Genevieve Lloyd (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.
Diethe, Carol, 1989. “Nietzsche and the Woman Question,” History of European Ideas, 865–875.
Diethe, Carol, 1998. “Nietzsche’s Women: Beyond the Whip,” New Nietzsche Studies: The Journal of the Nietzsche Studies 2 (3–4) (Summer).
Diprose, Rosalyn, 1989. “Nietzsche, Ethics, and Sexual Difference,” Radical Philosophy, 52: 27–33.
Froese, Katrin, 2005. “Woman’s Eclipse: The Silenced Feminine in Nietzsche and Heidegger,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 31(2): 165–184.
Garcia, del Pozo, Rosario, 2003. “Subjetividad femenina y genealogia del humanismo,” Themata: Revista de Filosofia, 31: 77–87.
Helm, Barbara, 2004. “Combating Misogyny? Responses to Nietzsche by Turn-of-the-Century German Feminists,” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 27(Spring): 64–84.
Higgins, Kathleen Marie, 1995. “Gender in ‘The Gay Science’,” Philosophy and Literature, 19(2): 227–247.
Holm, Elly and Paul Cilliers, 1998. “Beyond the Politics of Positionality: Deconstruction and Feminism,” South African Journal of Philosophy, 17(4): 377–394.
Johnson, Pauline, 1996. “Nietzsche’s Reception Today,” Radical Philosophy, 80: 24–33.
Joos, Ernest, 1985. “Nietzsche et les Femmes,” Laval Theol. Phil, 41: 305–315.
Kaufman, Cynthia, 1998. “Knowledge as Masculine Heroism or Embodied Perception: Knowledge, Will, and Desire in Nietzsche,” Hypatia, 13(4): 63–87.
Lorraine, Tamsin, 1994. “Nietzsche and Feminism: Transvaluing Women in ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra,” International Studies in Philosophy, 26(3): 13–21.
Makarushka, Irena, 1992. “Reflections on the ‘Other’ in Dineson, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche,” in Kierkegaard on Art and Communication, George Pattison (ed.), New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Malet, N., 1977. “L’Homme et la Femme dans la Philosophie de Nietzsche,” Rev. Metaph. Morale, 82: 38–63.
Menck, Christoph, 1993. “Schwerpunkt: Nietzsche und die Praktische Philosophie,” Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie, 41(5): 828–830.
Mortensen, Ellen, 1993. “Irigaray and Nietzsche: Echo and Narcissus Revisited?,” in The Fate of the New Nietzsche, Keith Ansell-Pearson (ed.), Brookfield: Avebury.
Munnich, Susana, 1996. “En torno a la frase de Nietzsche ‘Le verdad es mujar,’” in Convivium, 9: 77–91.
Oliver, Kelly, 1993. “The Plaint of Ariadne: Luce Irigaray’s ‘Amante Marine de Friedrich Nietzsche,” in The Fate of the New Nietzsche, Keith Ansell-Pearson (ed.), Brookfield: Avebury.
Orniston, Gayle, 1984. “Traces of Derrida: Nietzsche’s Image of Woman,” Philosophy Today, 28: 178–188.
Owen, David, 1993. “Nietzsche’s Squandered Seductions: Feminism, the Body, and the Politics of Genealogy,” in The Fate of the New Nietzsche, Keith Ansell-Pearson (ed.), Brookfield: Avebury.
Pasons, Katherine Pyne, 1974. “Nietzsche and Moral Change,” Feminist Studies, 2: 57–76.
Patton, Paul (ed.), 1999. “Nietzsche, Feminism, and Political Theory,” New Nietzsche Studies: The Journal of the Nietzsche Society, 3(3–4) (Summer-Fall).
Reguera, Isidoro, 1996. “El Nietzsche practico de Nolte: Nietzsche, profeta tragico de la guerra y organizador politico de la aniquilacion,” Revista de Filosofia, 8(14): 127–157.
Riser, John, 2001. “Two Types of Nihilism and Their Contemporary Relevance,” International Studies in Philosophy, 33(4): 77–98.
Schrift, Alan D., 1994. “On the Gift-Giving Virtue: Nietzsche’s Unacknowledged Feminine Economy,” International Studies in Philosophy, 26(3): 33–44.
Scott, Jacqueline, 1999. “Nietzsche and the Problem of Women’s Bodies,” International Studies in Philosophy, 31(3): 65–75.
Thompson, J. L., 1990. “Nietzsche on Woman,” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 207–220.
Wischke, Mirko, 1996. “The Conflict of Morality with Basic Life Instincts,” Synthesis Philosophica, 11(1): 39–48.

Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones (1848–1922)

Books

Jones, Emily Elizabeth Constance, 1890. Elements of Logic as a Science of Propositions, Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark.
Jones, Emily Elizabeth Constance, 1892. An Introduction to General Logic, London: Longman’s, Green, and Co.
Jones, Emily Elizabeth Constance, 1911. A New Law of Thought and Its Logical Bearings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Articles

Jones, Emily Elizabeth Constance, 1893–94. “Import Of Categorical Propositions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (2): 35–45.
Jones, Emily Elizabeth Constance, 1910–11. “A New Law of Thought,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (11): 166–186.
Jones, Emily Elizabeth Constance, 1915. “Analysis of Categorical Propositions,” Mind (24): 60–64.
Waithe, Mary Ellen and Samantha Cicero, 1995. “E.E. Constance Jones (1848–1922),” in A History of Women Philosophers, Mary Ellen Waithe (ed.), vol. 4, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 25–50.

Helene von Druskowitz (1856–1918)

Druskowitz, Helene von, 1905. Pessimistische Kardinalsätze – Ein Vademecum für freiesten Geister, Wittenberg: Herrose & Ziemsen.
Druskowitz, Helene von, 1988. Der Mann als logische und sittliche Unmöglichkeit und als Fluch der Welt, Traute Hensch (ed.), Freiburg: Kore.
Boršić, Luka 2017. “Helene Druskowitz u osvit modernog muškomrstva,” in Filozofkinje u Hrvatskoj, Luka Boršić, and Skuhala Karasman, Ivana (eds.) Zagreb: Institut za filozofiju, 145–163.
Schwartz, Agatha 2005. “Austrian Fin-de-Siècle Gender Heteroglossia: The Dialogism of Misogyny, Feminism, and Viriphobia,” German Studies Review 28 (2): 347–366.
Schwartz, Agatha 2008. Shifting Voices. Feminist Thought and Women’s Writing in Fin-de- Siècle Austria and Hungary. Montreal, et al.: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Schopenhauer, Arthur 1974. “On Women,” in Parerga and Paralipomena, vol. 2, E.F.J. Payne (transl.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 614–626.

Vernon Lee (Violet Paget) (1856–1935)

Books

Lee, Vernon, 1881. Belcaro: Essays on Sundry Aesthetical Questions. London: W. Satchell & Co.
Lee, Vernon, 1896. Art and life. East Aurora, NY: Roycroft.
Lee, Vernon, 1908. Gospels of anarchy and other contemporary studies, London and Leipzig: T. Fisher Unwin.
Lee, Vernon, 1915. Peace with Honour: Controversial Notes on the Settlement. London: Union of Democratic Control.
Lee, Vernon, 1915. The Ballet of the Nations: A Present-Day Morality. NY: Putnam.
Geoffroy, Sophie (ed.), 2017. Les femmes et la pensée politique: Vernon Lee et les cercles radicaux/Women and Political Theory: Vernon Lee and Radical Circles, Paris: Michel Houdiard Éditeur.
Maxwell, Catherine and Patricia Pulham (eds.), 2006. Vernon Lee: Decadence, Ethics, Aesthetics, Basington, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sieberg, Herward and Christa Zorn (eds.), 2014. The Anglo-German Correspon-dence of Vernon Lee and Irene Forbes-Mosse During World War I: Women Writers’ Friendship Transcending Enemy Lines, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Zorn, Christa, 2003. Vernon Lee: Aesthetics, History, and the Victorian Female Intellectual, Athens: Ohio University Press.

Articles

Lee, Vernon, 1915. “The Wish for Unanimity and the Willingness for War, France-Italy, 1911–13,” The Cambridge Magazine IV (12 June): 482–484.
Fraser, Hilary 1989. “Women and the Ends of Art History: Vision and Corporeality in Nineteenth Century Discourse,” Victorian Studies 42 (1): 77–100.
Maltz, Diana 2000. “Engaging ‘Delicate Brains’: From working class enculturation to upper-class lesbian liberation in Vernon Lee and Kit Anstruther-Thomson’s Psychological Aesthetics,” in Women and British Aestheticism, Kathy Alexis Psomiades, and Talia Shaffer (eds.), Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 211–29.

John Dewey (1859–1952)

Books

Dewey, John, 1916. Democracy and Education, London: Macmillan.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock (ed.), 2002. Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Articles

Diller, Ann, 2003. “Dewey, Gilligan, and Gosselin on Learning Responsibility,” Philosophy of Education Yearbook 2003, 316–318.
Duran, Jane, 2001. “A Holistically Deweyan Feminism,” Metaphilosophy, 32(3): 279–292.
Gatens-Robinson, Eugenie, 1991. “Dewey and the Feminist Successor Science Project,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 417–433.
Giarelli, James M., 1993. “Dewey and the Feminist Successor Pragmatism Project,” Free Inquiry, 13(1): 30–31.
Gosselin, Colette, 2003. “In a Different Voice and the Transformative Experience: A Deweyan Perspective,” Educational Theory, 53(1): 91–105.
Hart, Carroll Guen, 1993. “‘Power in the Service of Love’: John Dewey’s ‘Logic’ and the Dream of a Common Language,” Hypatia, 8(2): 1990–214.
James, V. Denise, 2009. “Theorizing Black Feminist Pragmatism: Forethoughts on the Practice and Purpose of Philosophy as Envisioned by Black Feminists and John Dewey”, Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 23(2): 92–99.
Leach, Mary, 1995. “(Re)searching Dewey for Feminist Imaginaries: Linguistic Continuity, Discourse, and Gossip,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13(3–4): 291–306.
Pappas, Gregory Fernando, 1993. “Dewey and Feminism: The Affective and Relationships in Dewey’s Ethics,” Hypatia, 8(2): 78–95.
Pappas, Gregory Fernando, 2001. “Dewey and Latina Lesbians on the Quest for Purity,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 15(2): 152–161.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 1998. “John Dewey’s Pragmatist Feminism,” in Reading Dewey, Larry A. Hickman (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 1999. “Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29(2): 207–230.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 2000. “Feminist Ethics and the Sociality of Dewey’s Moral Theory,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 36(4): 529–534.
Sorrell, Kory Spencer, 1999. “Feminist Ethics and Dewey’s Moral Theory,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 35(1): 89–114.
Sullivan, Shannon, 1997. “Teaching as a Pragmatist: Relating Non-Foundational Theory and Classroom Practice,” Teaching Philosophy, 20(4): 401–419.
Sullivan, Shannon, 2000. “Reconfiguring Gender with John Dewey: Habit, Bodies, and Cultural Change,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(1): 23–42.
Upin, Jane, 1993. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Instrumentalism Beyond Dewey,” Hypatia, 8(2): 15–37.

Jane Addams (1860–1935)

Books

Addams, Jane, 1972. The spirit of youth and the city streets, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Addams, Jane 1990. Twenty years at Hull-House, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Addams, Jane, 2002. Democracy and social ethics, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Addams, Jane, 2002. A new conscience and an ancient evil, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Addams, Jane, 2007. Newer ideals of peace, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Deegan, Mary Jo 1985. Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (ed.), 2002. The Jane Addams reader, New York: Basic Books.
Fischer, Marilyn, 2004. On Addams, Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth.
Fisher, Marilyn et al. (eds.), 2008. Jane Addams and the practice of democracy, Urbana: Illinois University Press.
Hamington, Maurice, 2004. Embodied care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and feminist ethics, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Hamington, Maurice, 2009. The social philosophy of Jane Addams, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Hamington, Maurice (ed.), 2010. Feminist interpretations of Jane Addams, Penn State Press.
Knight, Louise W., 2005. Citizen: Jane Addams and the struggle for democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Knight, Louise W., 2010. Jane Addams: Spirit in action, New York: W.W. Norton.

Articles

Fischer, Marilyn, 2002. “Jane Addams’s Critique of Capitalism as Patriarchal,” in Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey, Charlene Haddock Seigfried (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Leffers, M. Regina, 1993. “Pragmatists Jane Addams and John Dewey inform the ethic of care,” Hypatia 8 (2): 64–77.
MacMullan, Terrance, 2001. “On War as Waste: Jane Addams’ Pragmatic Pacifism,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 15(2): 86–104.
Mahowald, Mary Briody, 1997. “What Classical American Philosophers Missed: Jane Addams, Critical Pragmatism, and Cultural Feminism,” Journal of Value Inquiry, 31(1): 39–54.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 1999. “Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29(2): 207–230.
Sullivan, Shannon, 2003. “Reciprocal Relations between Races: Jane Addams’ Ambiguous Legacy,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 39(1): 43–60.

Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860–1935)

Books

Gilman, Charlotte Perkins, 1989. Women and economics. A study of the economic relation between men and women as a factor in social evolution, Boston: Small, Maynard & Co.
Lane, Ann J. & Meyerling, Sheryl L., 1990. To “Herland” and beyond. The life and works of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Pantheon Books.
Scharnhorst, Gary 1985. Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Boston: Twayne Publishers.

Articles

Deegan, Mary Jo, 2001. “The Ecofeminist Pragmatism of Charlotte Perkins Gilman,” Environmental Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Journal Dedicated to the Philosophical Aspects of Environmental Problems, 23(1): 16–36.
Diamond, Mary Ann, 1995. “The economics of Charlotte Perkins Gilman,” Woman of value, M.A. Diamond, (ed.) Aldershot: Elgar, 124–150.
Diller, Ann, 2003. “Dewey, Gilligan, and Gosselin on Learning Responsibility,” Philosophy of Education Yearbook 2003, 316–318.
Murphy, Julien S. 1995. “The economics of Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860–1935),” in A history of women philosophers. Contemporary women philosophers, 1900–today, M.E. Waithe (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer, 51–68.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 2001. “Can a Man-Hating Feminist Also Be a Pragmatist?: On Charlotte Perkins Gilman,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 15(2): 74–85.
Upin, Jane, 1993. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Instrumentalism Beyond Dewey,” Hypatia, 8(2): 15–37.

Other Nineteenth Century Philosophy

Harvey, Joy, 2004. Almost a Man of Genius: Clemence Royer, Feminism, and Nineteenth-Century Science, Rutgers University Press.
Jacobi, Juliane, 2000. “Friedrich Schleiermachers Idee zu einem Katechismus der Vernunft für edle Frauen. Ein Beitrag zur Bildungsgeschichte als Geschlechtergeschichte,” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, (46): 159–174. [contains the text of Schleiermacher’s essay]
Locke, Jill, and Eileen Hunt Botting (eds.), 2010. Feminist Interpretations of Alexis de Tocqueville, Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.
Landsberg, Hans, 1913 (ed.). Henriette Herz. Ihr Leben und ihre Zeit, Weimar: Kiepenheuer.
Li, Shang-Jen, 2004. “The Nurse of Parasites: Gender Concepts in Patrick Manson’s Parasitological Research,” Journal of the History of Biology, 37(1): 103–130.
Marshall, Megan, 2005. The Peabody Sisters: Three Women Who Ignited American Romanticism, New York: Mariner Books.
Miller, Marjorie C., 1994. “Essence and Identity: Santayana and the Category ‘Women,’” in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 30(1): 33–50.
Paulin, Roger, 2016. The Life of August Wilhelm Schlegel, Cosmopolitan of Art and Poetry, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Raymond, Camille, 2003. “L’utopie feminine americaine au 19e siecle: Victoria Woodhull et Tennessee Claflin,” Horizons Philosophiques, 14(1): 56–76.
Rogers, Dorothy G., 2004. “Before Care: Marietta Kies, Lucia Ames Mead, and Feminist Political Theory,” Hypatia: A Feminist Journal of Philosophy, 19(2): 105–117.
Sears, W. P., 1947. “The Educational Theories of Louisa May Alcott,” Dalhousie Review, 27: 327–334.
Stewart, Anna, 2010. “Revising ‘Harriet Jacobs’ for 1865,” American Literature 82 (4): 701–724.
Walhout, Donald, 2001. “Julia Gulliver as Philosopher,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 16(1): 72–89.
Wenzel, Catherina, 2000. “Wenn aus Drachen Prinzessinnen werden: Liselotte Richter als Universitatsprofessorin und leidenschaftlich religiose Denkerin,” Theologie und Philosophie: vierteljahresschrift, 75(2): 250–261.

Twentieth Century Philosophy: General

Books

Allen, Anne Taylor. Feminism and Motherhood in Western Europe, 1890–1970: The Maternal Dilemma, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Allen, Jeffner and Iris Marion Young (eds.), 1989. The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modern French Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Benstock, Shari (ed.), 1987. Feminist Issues in Literary Scholarship, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Haan, Francisca de, et al, 2006. Biographical Dictionary of Women’s Movements and Feminisms in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe, Budapest: Central European University Press.
Le Doeuff, Michele, 1990. The Philosophical Imaginary, Colin Gordon (trans.), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mathy, Jean Philippe, 1993. Extreme--Occident: French Intellectuals and America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Matthews, Eric, 1996. Twentieth-Century French Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Mortley, Raoul, 1991. French Philosophies in Conversation: Levinas, Schneider, Serres, Irigaray, Le Doeuff, Derrida, New York: Routledge.
Oliver, Kelly (ed.), 2000. French Feminism Reader, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Articles

Hall, Diana Long, 1976. “Biology, Sex Hormones, and Sexism in the 1920s,” in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Melander, Ellinor, 1992. “Toward the Sexual and Economic Emancipation of Women: The Philosophy of Grete Meisel-Hess,” History of European Ideas, 14(5): 695–713.
Pakszys, Elzbieta, 1998. “Women, Women’s Issues, and Feminism in Polish Philosophy,” in Philosophy in Post-Communist Europe, Dane R. Gordon (ed.), Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Sarvasy, Wendy, 1997. “Social Citizenship From a Feminist Perspective,” Hypatia, 12(4): 54–73.
Wosk, Julie, 1993. “The ‘Electric Eve’: Galvanizing Women in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Art and Technology,” Research in Philosophy and Technology, 13: 43–56.

Twentieth Century Philosophy: Classical Phenomenology

General Twentieth: Classical

Books

Casebien, Allan, 1992. Film and Phenomenology: Toward a Realist Theory of Cinematic Representation, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Articles

Dastur, Francoise, 2000. “Phenomenology of the Event: Waiting and Surprise,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(4): 178–189.
Kruks, Sonia, 1998. “Existentialism and Phenomenology,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
Oksala, Johanna, 2004. “What is Feminist Phenomenology? Thinking Birth Philosophically,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 126(July-August): 16–22.
Stoller, Silvia, 2005. “Asymmetrical Genders: Phenomenological Reflections on Sexual Difference,” Camilla R. Nielsen (trans.), in Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 20(2): 7–26.
Sullivan, Shannon, 2000. “Feminism and Phenomenology: A Reply to Silvia Stoller,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(1): 183–188.
Young, Iris Marion, 1980. “Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportments, Motility, and Spatiality,” Human Studies, 3: 137–156.
Willis, Clyde E., 1997. “The Phenomenology of Pornography: A Comment on Catharine MacKinnon’s ‘Only Words,’” Law and Philosophy, 16(2): 177–199.

Edmund Husserl (1859–1938)

Bergoffen, Debra B., 1996. “From Husserl to de Beauvoir: Gendering the Perceived Subject,” Metaphilosophy, 27(1–2): 53–62.
Nissim Sabat, Marilyn, 1991. “The Crisis in Psychoanalysis: Resolution Through Husserlian Phenomenology and Feminism,” Human Studies, 14: 33–66.

Edith Landmann-Kalischer (1877–1951)

Landmann-Kalischer, Edith, 1902. Analyse der ästhetischen Contemplation: (Malerei und Plastik), Leipzig.
Landmann-Kalischer, Edith, 1905. “Über den Erkenntniswert ästhetischer Urteile: Ein Vergleich zwischen Sinnes- und Werturteilen,” Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 5: 263–328.
Landmann-Kalischer, Edith, 1906. “Über künstlerische Wahrheit”, Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 1: 457–505.
Landmann-Kalischer, Edith, 1910. “Philosophie der Werte,” Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 18: 1–93.
Landmann-Kalischer, Edith, 1923. Die Transcendenz des Erkennens, Berlin: Bondi.
Landmann-Kalischer, Edith, 1952. Die Lehre vom Schönen, Vienna: Amandus.

Else Voigtländer (1882–1946)

Voigtländer, Else, 1910. Vom Selbstgefühl: Ein Beitrag zur Förderung psychologischen Denkens, Leipzig: Voigtländer.
Voigtländer, Else, 1916. “Über einen bestimmten Sinn des Wortes ‘unbewusst’,” Deutsche Psychologie, 1: 63–75.
Voigtländer, Else, 1917. “Zur Psychologie der Erzieherpersönlichkeit,” Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie und Jugendkunde, 18(5): 385–400.
Voigtländer, Else, 1920. “Zur Psychologie der politischen Stellungnahme,” Deutsche Psychologie, 3(3): 184–204.
Voigtländer, Else, 1923. “Über die ‘Art’ eines Menschen und das Erlebnis der ‘Maske’,” Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 92: 326–336.
Voigtländer, Else, 1928. “Fürsorgeerziehung und Psychoanalyse,” in Krisis der Psychoanalyse I, H. Prinzhorn and K. Mittenzwey (eds.), Leipzig: Der Neue Geist, 372–377.
Voigtländer, Else, 1937. “Über den Strafvollzug an Frauen,” Blätter für Gefängniskunde, 68(4): 268–278.

Hedwig Conrad-Martius (1888–1966)

Conrad-Martius, Hedwig, 1916. “Zur Ontologie und Erscheinungslehre der realen Außenwelt”, in Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 3, Halle: Max Niemeyer, 345–542.
Conrad-Martius, Hedwig 1924. “Realontologie”, special print in Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung VI, Halle: Max Niemeyer, 159–333.
Conrad-Martius, Hedwig, 1957. Das Sein, Kösel: München.
Miron, Ronny, 2014. “The Gate of Reality – Hedwig Conrad-Martius’ Idea of Reality in ‘Realontologie’,” in Phänomenologische Forschungen, 2014: 59–82.
Miron, Ronny, 2015. “The Vocabulary of Reality”, in Human Studies, 38(3): 331–347.
Miron, Ronny, 2016. “In the midst of Being – A Journey into the Internality of Being in Hedwig Conrad-Marius Metaphysics,” in Phenomenological Ontologies: Individuality, Essence, Idea (Special Issue of Discipline Filosofiche), 26(1): 217–244.
Miron, Ronny, 2018. “Essence, Abyss and Self – Hedwig Conrad-Martius on the Non-Spatial Dimensions of Being,” in Luft, Sebastian & Hagengruber, Ruth (eds.) Woman Phenomenologists on Social Ontology. We-Experiences, Communal Life, and Joint Action, Springer VS, 147–167.
Schmücker, Franz Georg, 1956. Die Phänomenologie als Methode der Wesenserkenntnis, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Auffassung der München-Göttinger Phänomenologenschule (Dissertation). München.

Edith Stein (1891–1942)

Books

Stein, Edith, 1989. On the Problem of Empathy, Stein, Waltraut (transl.), Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.
Stein, Edith, 2000. Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities, Mary Baseheart, Mary Catharine and Marianne Sawicki (transl.), Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.
Stein, Edith, 2002. Finite and Eternal Being, Kurt F. Reinhardt (transl.), Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.
Stein, Edith, 2004. Einführung in die Philosophie, in Edith-Stein-Gesamtausgabe, vol. 8, Mariéle-Claudia Wulf (ed.), Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
Stein, Edith, 2007. An Investigation Concerning the State, Sawicki Marianne (trans.), Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.
Baseheart, Mary Catherine, 2010. Person in the World: Introduction to the Philosophy of Edith Stein, Dordrecht: Springer.
Beckmann-Zöller, Beate and Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz (eds.), 2006. Die unbekannte Edith Stein: Phänomenologie und Sozialphilosophie, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Borden Sharkey, Sarah, 2009. Thine Own Self: Individuality in Edith Stein’s Later Writings, Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
Calcagno, Antonio 2014. Lived Experience from the Inside Out: The Social and Political Philosophy of Edith Stein, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Lebech, Mette, 2004. “Study Guide to Edith Stein’s Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities”, in Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society, 2004: 40–76.
Maskulak, Marian 2007. Edith Stein and the Body-Soul-Spirit at the Center of Holistic Formation, New York: Peter Lang.
Pezzella, Anna Maria, 2003. L’antropologia filosofica di Edith Stein: indagine fenomenologica della persona umana, Rome: Citta Nuova.
Rieß, Wolfgang, 2010. Der Weg vom Ich zum Anderen: Die philosophische Begründung einer Theorie von Individuum, Gemeinschaft und Staat bei Edith Stein, Dresden: Echard Richter und Co.
Sawicki, Marianne, 1997. Body, Text and Science: The Literacy of Investigative Practices and the Phenomenology of Edith Stein, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.

Articles

Ales Bello, Angela, 2001. “The Study of the Soul Between Psychology and Phenomenology,” in The Philosophy of Edith Stein: The Eighteenth Annual Symposium of the Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center, Pittsburgh, PA: Silverman Institute for Phenomenology at Duquesne University, 3–17.
Ales Bello, Angela, 2006. “Ontology, Metaphysics, and Life in Edith Stein,” in Contemplating Edith Stein, J.A. Berkman (ed.), Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 271–82.
Ales Bello, Angela, 2007. “The Study of the Soul between Psychology and Phenomenology,” Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, (8): 90–108.
Beer, Laura Judd, 2016. “Women’s Existence, Woman’s Soul: Essence and Existence in Edith Stein’s Later Feminism”, in Edith Stein: Women, Social-Political Philosophy, Theology, Metaphysics and Public History, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 35–45.
Borden Sharkey, Sarah, 2006. “What Makes You You? Edith Stein on Individual Form,” in Contemplating Edith Stein. Berkman, J.A. (ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 283–300.
Borden, Sarah, 2006, “Edith Stein’s Understanding of Woman”, International Philosophical Quarterly, 46(2): 171–190.
Brenner, Rachel Feldhay, 1994, “Edith Stein: A Reading of Her Feminist Thought”, Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 23(1): 43–56.
Calcagno, Antonio, 2008. “Thinking Community and the State from Within,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 82(1): 31–45.
Calcagno, Antonio, 2011. “Edith Stein’s Philosophy of Community in Her Early Work and in Her Later Finite and Eternal Being: Martin Heidegger’s Impact,” Philosophy and Theology, 23(2): 231–55.
De Vecchi, Francesca, 2015, “Edith Stein’s Social Ontology of the State, the Law and Social Acts: An Eidetic Approach:”, Studia Phaenomenologica, 15: 303–330.
Dullstein, Monika, 2013. “Direct Perception and Simulation: Stein’s Account of Empathy,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(2): 333–50.
Galvani, Martina, 2018, “The Role of the Intellectual in the Social Organism: Edith Stein’s Analysis Between Social Ontology and Philosophical Anthropology”, in Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology: We-Experiences, Communal Life, and Joint Action, Luft and Hagengruber (eds.), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 75–84.
Haney, Kathleen, 2000. “Edith Stein: Woman and Essence”, in Feminist Phenomenology, Linda Fisher and Lester Embree (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 213–235.
Haney, Kathleen, 2009. “Empathy and Otherness,” Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry, 4(8): 11–19.
Jani, Anna, 2018. “The Ontic-Ontological Aspects of Social Life. Edith Stein’s Approach to the Problem,” in Sebastian Luft and Ruth Hagengruber (eds.): Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology. We-Experiences, Social Life, and Joint Action, Springer VS, 45–61.
Schulz, Peter 2008. “Toward the Subjectivity of the Human Person: Edith Stein’s Contribution to the Theory of Identity,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 82(1): 161–76.

Gerda Walther (1897–1977)

Walther, Gelda, 1922. Ein Beitrag zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften: Mit einem Anhang zur Phänomenologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften, Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
Walther, Gelda, 1923. “Zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften,” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 6: 2–158.
Walther, Gelda, 1923. Zur Phänomenologie der Mystik, Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
Walther, Gelda, 1925. “Zur Psychologie der sogenannten ‘moral insanity’,” Japanisch-deutsche Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Technik, 3: 174–184.
Walther, Gelda, 1927. “Zur innenpsychischen Struktur der Schizophrenie,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 108: 56–85.
Walther, Gelda, 1960. Zum anderen Ufer: Vom Marxismus und Atheismus zum Christentum, Remagen: Reichl.
Calcagno, Antonio (ed.), 2018. Gerda Walther’s phenomenology of sociality, psychology, and religion, Dordrecht: Springer.

Martin Heidegger (1889–1976)

Books

Graybeal, Jean, 1990. Language and “The Feminine” in Nietzsche and Heidegger, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Holland, Nancy, 1998. The Madwoman’s Dream: The Concept of the Appropriate in Ethical Thought, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Holland, Nancy J. and Patricia Huntington (eds.), 2001. Feminist Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Huntington, Patricia J., 1998. Ecstatic Subjects, Utopia, and Recognition: Kristeva, Heidegger, Irigaray, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Articles

Bauer, Nancy, 2001. “Being-with as Being-Against: Heidegger Meets Hegel in the Second Sex,” Continental Philosophy Review, 34(2): 129–149.
Dastur, Francoise, 2000. “Phenomenology of the Event: Waiting and Surprise,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(4): 178–189.
Froese, Katrin, 2005. “Woman’s Eclipse: The Silenced Feminine in Nietzsche and Heidegger,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 31(2): 165–184.
Holland, Nancy J., 1985. “Heidegger and Derrida Redux: A Close Reading,” in Hermeneutics and Deconstruction, Hugh J. Silverman (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press.
Keltner, Stacy, 2003. “The Politics of Traumatic Temporality: Review of Time, Death, and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger by Tina Chanter,” Research in Phenomenology, 33: 306–315.
Klawiter, Maren, 1990. “Using Arendt and Heidegger to Consider Feminist Thinking on Women and Reproductive/Infertility Technologies,” Hypatia, 5(3): 65–89.
Mansbach, Abraham, 1998. “Martin Heidegger: Political Enemy/Philosophical Enemy?” in Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 47(October): 418–426.
Ortega, Mariana, 2001. “New Mestizas, ‘World’-Travelers, and Dasein: Phenomenology and the Multi-Voiced, Multi-Cultural Self,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 16(3): 1–29.
Paley, John, 2000. “Heidegger and the Ethics of Care,” in Nursing Philosophy: An International Journal for Healthcare Professionals, 1(1): 64–75.
Standish, Paul, 1999. “Only Connect: Computer Literacy from Heidegger to Cyberfeminism,” Educational Theory, 49(4): 417–435.
Vasey, Craig R., 1992. “Faceless Women and Serious Others,” in Ethics and Danger, Arleen B. Dallery (ed.), Albany: State University of New York Press.

Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908–1961)

Books

Evans, Fred and Leonard Lawlor (eds.), 2000. Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty’s Notion of Flesh, Albany: State University Press.
Olkowski, Dorothea and Gail Weiss (eds.), 2006. Feminist Interpretations of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Vasseleu, Cathryn, 2001. Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas, and Merleau-Ponty, New York: Routledge.

Articles

Antonio, Diane, 2001. “The Flesh of All That Is: Merleau-Ponty, Irigaray, and Julian’s ‘Showings,’” in Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics, 40(2): 47–65.
Bigwood, Carol, 1991. “Renaturalizing the Body (With a Little Help from Merleau-Ponty),” Hypatia, 6(3): 54–73.
Cataldi, Suzanne Laba, 2004. “The Philosopher and Her Shadow: Irigaray’s Reading of Merleau-Ponty,” Philosophy Today, 48(4): 343–354.
Coole, Diana, 2001. “Thinking Politically with Merleau-Ponty,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 108(July-August): 17–28.
Fielding, Helen, 1996. “Grounding Agency in Depth: The Implications of Merleau-Ponty’s Thought for the Politics of Feminism,” Human Studies, 19(2): 175–184.
Hough, Sheridan, 2003. “Phenomenology, Pomo Baskets and the Work of Mabel McKay,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 18(2): 103–113.
Kozel, Susan, 1996. “The Diabolical Strategy of Mimesis: Luce Irigaray’s Reading of Maurice Merleau-Ponty,” Hypatia, 11(3): 114–129.
Lopez Saenz, Maria Carmen, 2004. “Interpretacion feminista de la corporalidad: Merleau-Ponty revistado,” Estudios Filosoficos, 53(152): 45–58.
O’Loughlin, Marjorie, 1995. “Intelligent Bodies and Ecological Subjectivists: Merleau-Ponty’s Corrective to Postmodernism’s ‘Subjects’ of Education,” in Philosophy of Education, Alven Neiman (ed.), Urbana: Philosophy of Education and Society.
O’Loughlin, Marjorie, 1998. “Overcoming the Problems of ‘Difference’ in Education: Empathy as ‘Intercorporeality,’” in Studies in Philosophy of Education, 17(4): 283–293.
Popen, Shari, 1995. “Merleau-Ponty Confronts Postmodernism: A Reply to O’Loughlin,” in Philosophy of Education, Alven Neiman (ed.), Urbana: Philosophy of Education and Society.
Preston, Beth, 1996. “Merleau-Ponty and the Feminine Embodied Eixstence,” Man and World, 29(2): 167–186.
Stoller, Silvia, 2000. “Reflections on Feminist Merleau-Ponty Skepticism,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(1): 175–182.
Stoller, Silvia, 2001. “The Sexual Difference from the Perspective of Merleau-Ponty,” Alfred Leskovec (transl.) in Phainomena, 10(37–38): 199–210.
Sullivan, Shannon, 1997. “Domination and Dialogue in Merleau-Ponty’s ‘Phenomenology of Perception,’” Hypatia, 12(1): 1–19.
Welsh, Talia, 2001. “The Logic of the Observed: Merleau-Ponty’s Conception of Women As Outlined in His 1951–1952 Sorbonne Lecture The Question of Method in Child Psychology,” Symposium: Journal of the Canadian Society for Hermeneutics and Postmodern Thought, 5(1): 83–94.

Twentieth Century Philosophy: Early Analytic Philosophy

Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947)

Books

Davaney, Sheila Greeve (ed.), 1981. Feminism and Process Thought, New York: Mellen Press.

Articles

Cobb, John Jr., 1991. “Whiteheadian Thought,” Dialogue and Humanism, 1(2): 79–91.
Havell, Nancy R., 1988. “The Promise of a Process Feminist Theory of Relations,” Process Studies, 17: 78–87.
Morgan, Kathryn Pauly, 2002. “Desperately Seeking Evelyn, or, Alternatively, Exploring Pedagogies of the Personal in Alfred North Whitehead and Feminist Theory,” Philosophy of Education, 2002: 369–377.
Stengel, Barbara S., 2002. “Why Whitehead? Toward a Pedagogy of the Truly Personal,” Philosophy of Education, 2002: 378–381.
Thie, Marilyn, 1978. “Feminist Concerns and Whitehead’s Theory of Perception,” Process Studies, 8: 186–191.
Ulshofer, Gotlind B., 2000. “A Whiteheadian Business Ethics and the Western Hemisphere,” Journal of Business Ethics, 23(1): 67–71.
Wang, Zhihe, 2002. “What Can Whitehead’s Philosophy Contribute to Feminism?” Process Studies, 31(2): 125–137.

Bertrand Russell (1872–1970)

Harrison, Brian, 1984. “Bertrand Russell: The False Consciousness of a Feminist,” Russell, 4: 157–206.
Martin, Bill, 1989. “’To the Lighthouse’ and the Feminist Path to Posmodernity,” Philosophy and Literature, 13: 307–315.
Tait, Katharine, 1978. “Russell and Feminism,” Russell, 29: 5–16.

Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)

Books

Scheman, Naomi and Peg O’Connor (eds.), 2002. Feminist Interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Tanesini, Alessandro, 2004. Wittgenstein: A Feminist Interpretation, Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Articles

Caraway, Carol, 2002. “Kritika, kontekst I zajednica: Veze izmedu Wittgensteinova spisa o izvjesnosti I feministicke epistemologije,” Prolegomena: Casopis za filozofiju, Kristijan Krkac (transl.), 1(2): 155–162.
Davidson, Joyce and Mick Smith, 1999. “Wittgenstein and Irigaray: Gender and Philosophy in a Language (Game) of Difference,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(20): 72–96.
Duran, Jane, 2002. “Wittgenstein, Feminism and Theory,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 28(3): 321–336.
Garavaso, Pieranna, 1999. “The Quine/Wittgenstein Controversy: Any Role for Feminist Empiricism in It?” in Epistemologia: Rivista Italiana di Filosofia della Scienza, 22(1): 63–90.
Lampshire, Wendy Lee, 1991. “History as Genealogy: Wittgenstein and the Feminist Deconstruction of Objectivity,” Philosophy and Theology, 5(4): 313–331.
Lampshire, Wendy Lee, 1995. “Women--Animals--Machines: A Grammar for a Wittgensteinian Ecofeminism,” Journal of Value Inquiry, 29(1): 89–101.
Lee-Lampshire, Wendy, 1999. “The Sound of Little Hummingbird Wings: A Wittgensteinian Investigation of Forms of Life as Forms of Power,” Feminist Studies, 25(2): 409–426.
Lee-Lampshire, Wendy, 1999. “Spilling All Over the Wide Fields of Our Passions: Frye, Butler, Wittgenstein and the Context(s) of Attention, Intention and Identity (Or: From Arm Wrestling Duck to Abject Being to Lesbian Feminist),” in Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(3): 1–16.
Medina, Josa, 2005. “The Meanings of Silence: Wittgensteinian Contextualism and Polyphony,” in Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 47(6): 562–579.
Soulez, Antonia, 2000. “Conversion on Philosophy: Wittgenstein’s Saving Word,” in Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 15(4): 127–150.
Zerilli, Linda M.G., 1998. “Doing without Knowing: Feminism’s Politics of the Ordinary,” in Political Theory: An International Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(4): 435–458.

G.E.M. Anscombe (1919–2001)

Anscombe, G.E.M., 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy, 33: 1–19.
Anscombe, G.E.M., 1961. “War and Murder,” in Nuclear Weapons: A Catholic Response, Walter Stein (ed.), London: Merlin, 43–62.
Anscombe, G.E.M., 1972. “Contraception and Chastity,” The Human World, 9: 41–51.
Anscombe, G.E.M., 1981. Ethics, Religion and Politics (The Collected Philosophical papers of G.E.M. Anscombe, vol.3), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Anscombe, G.E.M., 2005. Human Life, Action, and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe, M. Geach and L. Gormally (eds.), Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Anscombe, G.E.M., 2008. Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe, M.Geach and L.Gormally (eds.), Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Ford, Anton, Jennifer Hornsby, and Frederick Stoutland,(eds.) 2011. Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Teichmann, Roger, 2008. The Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Twentieth Century Philosophy: Existentialism

Jean-Paul Sartre (1905–1980)

Books

Allen, Jeffner and Iris Marion Young (eds.), 1989. The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modern French Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Barrett, W., 1962. Irrational Man, New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Kruks, Sonia, 2001. Retrieving Experience: Subjectivity and Recognition in Feminist Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Murphy, Julien S. (ed.), 1999. Feminist Interpretations of Jean-Paul Sartre, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Articles

Barnes, Hazel E., 1990. “Sartre and Sexism,” Philosophy and Literature, 14(2): 340–347.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 1992. “The Look as Bad Faith,” Philosophy Today, 36(3): 221–227.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 2002. “Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre: Woman, Man, and the Desire to Be God,” Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 9(3): 409–418.
Charme, Stuart Z., 2000. “Revisiting Sartre on the Question of Religion,” Continental Philosophy Review, 33(1): 1–26.
Collins, Margery, 1973. “Holes and Slime: Sexism in Sartre’s Psychoanalysis,” in Philosophical Forum, 5(1): 112.
Comesana, Gloria M., 1986. “Analisis de las figuras femeninas en el teatro de Sartre,” Revista de Filosofia (Venezuela), 9: 103–133.
Comesana Santalices, Gloria, 1996. “’Behind Closed Doors’: Analysis of the Feminine Figures in Sartrean Theater,” Revista de Filosofia, 24(2): 53–79.
Comesana Santalices, Gloria M., 1998. “Jean Paul Sartre: Filosofo de la Disidencia,” Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de Filosofia Iberoamericana y Teoria Social, 3(5): 119–128.
Duran, Jane, 2004. “Sartre, Gender Theory and the Possibility of Transcendence,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 30(3): 265–281.
Fullbrook, Kate and Edward Fullbrook, 1995. “Sartre’s Secret Key,” in Feminist Interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, Margaret A. Simons (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Fullbrook, Edward, 1999. “She Came to Stay and Being and Nothingness,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 50–69.
Gothlin, Eva, 1999. “Simone de Beauvoir’s Notions of Appeal, Desire, and Ambiguity and Their Relationship to Jean-Paul Sartre’s Notions of Appeal and Desire,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 83–95.
Grell, Isabelle, 2004. “The Invention of Two Women in Les Chemins de la liberte,” Sartre Studies International: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Existentialism and Contemporary Culture, 10(2): 161–181.
Kruks, Sonia, 1995. “Simone de Beauvoir: Teaching Sartre About Freedom,” in Feminist Interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, Margaret A. Simons (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lancaster, Natascha H., 2000. “Women and Minorities vs. Sartre: Win, Win…Win!” in Sartre Studies International: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Existentialism and Contemporary Culture, 6(2): 12–25.
Mui, Constance, 1990. “Sartre’s Sexism Reconsidered,” Auslegung, 16(1): 31–41.
Murphy, Julien S., 1987. “The Look in Sartre and Rich,” Hypatia, 2: 113–124.
Oliver, Kelly, 2001. “The Look of Love,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 16(3): 56–78.
Skakoon, Walter, 2000. “A Commentary: Natascha H. Lancaster’s Minorities versus Sartre’s Saint Genet and Loren Ringer’s L’homosexuel imaginaire: Sartre’s Interpretive Grid in Saint Genet,” Sartre Studies International: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Existentialism and Contemporary Culture, 6(2): 36–45.

Simone de Beauvoir (1908–1986)

Books

Ascher, Carole, 1981. Simone de Beauvoir: A Life of Freedom, Brighton: Harvester Press.
Bauer, Nancy, 2001. Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy and Feminism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 1997. The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered Phenomenologies, Erotic Generosities, Albany: SUNY Press.
Bieber, Konrad, 1979. Simone de Beauvoir, Boston: Hall.
Card, Claudia (ed.), 2003. The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Easlea, B., 1981. Science and Sexual Oppression, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
Fallaize, Elizabeth (ed.), 1998. Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, New York: Routledge.
Fraser, Mariam, 2001. Identity without Selfhood: Bisexuality and Simone de Beauvoir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fullbrook, Edward and Kate Fullbrook, 1998. Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press and Malden MA: Blackwell.
Keefe, Terry, 1983. Simone de Beauvoir: A Study of Her Writings, Totowa: Barnes and Noble.
Moi, Toril, 1994. Simone de Beauvoir: The Making of an Intellectual Woman, Oxford: Blackwell.
Nordquist, Joan, 1991. Social Theory: A Bibliographic Series, No. 23--Simone de Beauvoir: A Bibliography, Santa Cruz: Reference and Research.
O’Brien, Wendy and Lester Embree (eds.), 2001. The Existential Phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir, Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Okely, Judith, 1986. Simone de Beauvoir, New York: Pantheon.
Pilardi, Jo-Ann, 1999. Simone de Beauvoir Writing the Self: Philosophy Becomes Autobiography, Westport CT: Greenwood Press.
Richards, Janet Radcliffe, 1980. The Sceptical Feminist: A Philosophical Inquiry, Boston: Routledge and K. Paul.
Sabrosky, Judith A., 1979. From Rationality to Liberation, Westport: Greenwood Press.
Savage Brosman, Catharine, 1991. Simone de Beauvoir Revisited, Boston: Twayne.
Simons, Margaret A. (ed.), 1995. Feminist Interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Simons, Margaret A., 1999. Beauvoir and The Second Sex: Feminism, Race, and the Origins of Existentialism, Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Wenzel, Helene Vivienne (ed.), 1986. Simone de Beauvoir: Witness to a Century, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Articles

Adan, Carme, 1999. “Entre a modernidade e a posmodernidade: Simone de Beauvoir,” Agora: Papeles de Filosofia, 18(2): 65–82.
Alexander, Anna, 1997. “The Eclipse of Gender: Simone de Beauvoir and the ‘Differance’ of Translation,” Philosophy Today, 41(1–4): 112–120.
Alexander, Anna, 2003. “Outside The Second Dex: Beauvoir’s pensee du dehors,” Bulletin de la Societe Americaine de Philosophie de Langue Francaise, 13(1): 94–127.
Andrew, Barbara S., 1998. “Care, Freedom, and Reciprocity in the Ethics of Simone de Beauvoir,” Philosophy Today, 42(3): 290–300.
Arp, Kristana, 1999. “Conceptions of Freedom in Beauvoir’s The Ethics of Ambiguity,” International Studies in Philosophy, 31(2): 25–34.
Barnes, Hazel, 1998. “Self-Encounter in She Came to Stay,” in Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, Elizabeth Fallaize (ed.), New York: Routledge, 157–170.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 1996. “From Husserl to de Beauvoir: Gendering the Perceived Subject,” Metaphilosophy, 27(1–2): 53–62.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 2001. “Menage a trois: Freud, Beauvoir, and the Marquis de Sade,” Continental Philosophy Review, 34(2): 151–163.
Bergoffen, Debra B., 2002. “Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre: Woman, Man, and the Desire to Be God,” Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 9(3): 409–418.
Butler, Judith, 1984. “Gendering the Body: Beauvoir’s Philosophical Contribution,” in Beyond Domination: New Perspectives on Women and Philosophy, Carol Gould (ed.), Totowa NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
Butler, Judith, 1998. “Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex,” in Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, Elizabeth Fallaize (ed.), New York: Routledge, 29–42.
Cataldi, Sue L., 1999. “Sexuality Situated: Beauvoir on Frigidity,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 70–82.
Chanter, Tina, 2000. “Abjection and Ambiguity: Simone de Beauvoir’s Legacy,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 14(2): 138–155.
Dallery, Arleen B., 1985. “Sexual Embodiment: Beauvoir and French Feminist (‘Ecriture Feminine’),” Hypatia, WSIF 3: 197–202.
Deutscher, Penelope, 1999. “Bodies, Lost and Found: Simone de Beauvoir from The Second Sex to Old Age,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 96(July-August): 6–16.
Dijkstra, Sandra, 1980. “Simone de Beauvoir and Betty Friedan,” Feminist Studies, 6: 290–303.
Duran, Jane, 2000. “The Two Simones,” Ratio: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 13(3): 201–212.
Dykeman, Therese B., 2001. “Simone de Beauvoir: Facilitator for Feminist Ethics,” International Journal for Field-Being, 1 (pt. 1)/1, 13/1–6.
Engel, Sabine, 2003. “Reprendre Le deuxieme sexe,” Bulletin de la Societe Americaine de Philosophie de Langue Francaise, 13(1): 1–15.
Fallaize, Elizabeth, 1998. “Narrative Strategies and Sexual Politics in Beauvoir’s Fiction,” in Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, Elizabeth Fallaize (ed.), New York: Routledge, 193–202.
Farrell Smith, Janet, 1986. “Possessive Power,” Hypatia, 1: 103–120.
Felstiner, Mary Lowenthal, 1980. “Seeing ‘The Second Sex’ Through the Second Wave,” Feminist Studies, 6: 247–276.
Ferguson, Ann, 1985. “Lesbian Identity: Beauvoir and History,” Hypatia, WSIF 3: 203–208.
Fraser, Miriam, 1997. “Feminism, Foucault, and Deleuze,” Theory, Culture, and Society, 14(2): 23–37.
Fullbrook, Edward and Kate Fullbrook, 1999. “The Absence of Beauvoir,” in Feminist Interpretations of Jean-Paul Sartre, Julien S. Murphy (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 45–63.
Gothlin, Eva, 1999. “Simone de Beauvoir’s Notions of Appeal, Desire, and Ambiguity and Their Relationship to Jean-Paul Sartre’s Notions of Appeal and Desire,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 83–95.
Green, Karen, 1999. “Sartre and de Beauvoir on Freedom and Oppression,” in Feminist Interpretations of Jean-Paul Sartre, Julien S. Murphy (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 175–199.
Heinamaa, Sara, 1999. “Simone de Beauvoir’s Phenomenology of Sexual Difference,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 114–132.
Hengehold, Laura, 2002. “Anonymity Would Have Suited Me Perfectly: Simone Beauvoir on Writing as a Practice of Intimacy,” Philosophical Forum, 33(2): 195–211.
Hughes, Alex, 1998. “Murdering the Mother I Memoirs of a Dutiful Daughter,” in Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, Elizabeth Fallaize (ed.), New York: Routledge, 120–131.
Hutchings, Kimberly, 2001. “De Beauvoir’s Hegelianism: Rethinking the Second Sex,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 107(May-June): 21–31.
Hollywood, Amy M., 1994. “Beauvoir, Irigaray, and the Mystical,” Hypatia, 9(4): 158–185.
Idt, Genevieve, 1991. “Simone de Beauvoir’s Adieux: A Funeral Rite and a Literary Challenge,” in Sartre Alive Ronald Aronson (ed.), Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Jeanson, Francis, 1998. “The Father in Memoirs of a Dutiful Daughter,” in Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, Elizabeth Fallaize (ed.), New York: Routledge, 111–119.
Krause, Sharon, 2000. “Lady Liberty’s Allure: Political Agency, Citizenship and The Second Sex,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 26(1): 1–24.
Kruks, Sonia, 1998. “Beauvoir: The Weight of Situation,” in Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, Elizabeth Fallaize (ed.), New York: Routledge, 43–71.
Kruks, Sonia, 2005. “Beauvoir’s Time/Our Time: The Renaissance in Simone de Beauvoir Studies,” Feminist Studies, 31(2): 286–309.
Kruks, Sonia, 2005. “Simone de Beauvoir and the Politics of Privilege,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 20(1): 178–205.
Kvigne, Kari and Marit Kirkevold, 2002. “A Feminist Perspective on Stroke Rehabilitation: The Relevance of de Beauvoir’s Theory,” Nursing Philosophy: A International Journal for Healthcare Professionals, 3(2): 79–89.
Langer, Monika, 1994. “A Philosophical retrieval of Simone de Beauvoir’s ‘Pour Une Morale de l’amiguite,’” Philosophy Today, 38(2): 181–190.
Lazaro, Reyes, 1996. “Feminism and Motherhood: O’Brien vs. Beauvoir,” Hypatia, 1: 87–102.
Le Doeuff, Michele, 1979. “Operative Philosophy: Simone de Beauvoir and Existentialism,” Ideology and Consciousness, 6(Autumn): 47–58.
Leon, Celine T., 1995. “Beauvoir’s Woman: Eunuch or Male?” in Feminist Interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, Margaret A. Simons (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 137–160.
Levaux, Michele, 1984. “Simone de Beauvoir, une feministe exceptionnelle,” Etudes, 360: 493–498.
Linsenbard, Gail E., 1999. “Beauvoir, Ontology, and Women’s Human Rights,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 145–162.
Lundgren Gothlin, Eva, 1997. “Ethics, Feminism, and Postmodernism: Seyla Benhabib and Simone de Beauvoir,” in The Postmodern Critique of the Project of the Enlightenment, Sven Eric Liedman (ed.), Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Lundgren Gothlin, Eva, 1994. “Simone de Beauvoir and Ethics,” History of European Ideas, 19(4–6): 899–903.
Mahowald, Mary Briody, 1992. “To be or Not to Be a Woman: Anorexia Nervosa, Normative Gender Roles, and Feminism,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17(2): 233–251.
Malion, Joseph, 1993. “Existentialism, Feminism, and Simone de Beauvoir,” History of European Ideas, 17(5): 651–658.
McCall, D. Kaufman, 1979. “Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex and Jean-Paul Sartre,” Signs, 5(2): 209–223.
Miller, Elaine P., 2000. “The Paradoxical Displacement: Beauvoir and Irigaray on Hegel’s Antigone,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 14(2): 121–137.
Okely, Judith, 1998. “Rereading The Second Sex,” in Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader, Elizabeth Fallaize (ed.), New York: Routledge, 19–28.
Opara, Chioma, 2001. “African Feminist Thought and Beauvoirism Paradigm,” Philosophy and Social Action, 27(3): 39–52.
Pilardi, Jo Ann, 1993. “The Changing Critical Fortunes of ‘The Second Sex,’” History and Theory, 32: 51–73.
Purvis, Jennifer, 2003. “Hegelian Dimensions of The Second Sex: A Feminist Consideration,” Bulletin de la Societe Americaine de Philosophie de Langue Francaise, 13(1): 128–156.
Sandford, Stella, 1999. “Contingent Ontologies: Sex, Gender and ‘Woman’ in Simone de Beauvoir and Judith Butler,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 97(September-October): 18–29.
Scholz, Sally J., 2000. “Simone de Beauvoir on Language,” Philosophy Today, 44(3): 211–223.
Scholz, Sally J., 2001. “Writing for Liberation: Simone de Beauvoir and Woman’s Writing,” Philosophy Today, 45(4): 335–348.
Schusterman, Richard, 2003. “Somaesthetics and The Second Sex: A Pragmatist Reading of a Feminist Classic,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 18(4): 106–136.
Schutte, Ofelia, 1997. “A Critique of Normative Heterosexuality: Identity, Embodiment, and Sexual Difference in Beauvoir and Irigaray,” Hypatia, 12(1): 40–62.
Secomb, Linnell, 1999. “Beauvoir’s Minoritarian Philosophy,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 96–113.
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock, 1985. “’Second Sex’: Second Thoughts,” Hypatia, WSIF 3: 219–229.
Simons, Margaret A., 1998. “Beauvoir and the Roots of Radical feminism,” in Reinterpreting the Politics: Continental Philosophy and Political Theory, Lenore Langsdorf (ed.), Albany: State University of New York Press.
Simons, Margaret A. and Jessica Benjamin, 1979. “Simone de Beauvoir: An Interview,” Feminist Studies, 5: 330–345.
Simons, Margaret A., 1990. “Sexism and the Philosophical Canon: On Reading Beauvoir’s ‘The Second Sex,’” Journal of the History of Ideas, 51(3): 487–504.
Simons, Margaret A., 1989. “Two Interviews With Simone de Beauvoir,” Hypatia, 3: 11–27.
Simons, Margaret A., 2000. “Beauvoir’s Philosophical Independence in a Dialogue with Sartre,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 14(2): 87–103.
Singer, Linda, 1985. “Interpretation and Retrieval: Rereading Beauvoir,” Hypatia, WSIF 3: 231–238.
Slattery, Patrick and Marla Morris, 1999. “Simone de Beauvoir’s Ethics and Postmodern Ambiguity: The Assertion of Freedom in the Face of the Absurd,” Educational Theory, 49(1): 21–36.
Spelman, Elizabeth, 1982. “Women as Body: Ancient and Contemporary Views,” Feminist Studies, 8(1): 109–131.
Tidd, Ursula, 1999. “The Self-Other Relation in Beauvoir’s Ethics and Autobiography,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 163–174.
Tirrell, Lynne, 1993. “Definition and Power: Toward Authority Without Privilege,” Hypatia, 8(4): 1–34.
Varikas, Eleni, 2005. “Lo que no somos: Historicidad del genero y estrategias de desidentificacion,” Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica, 25(July): 77–88.
Veltman, Andrea, 2004. “The Sisyphean Torture of Housework; Simone de Beauvoir and Inequitable Divisions of Domestic Work in Marriage,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(3): 121–143.
Vintges, Karen, 1999. “Simone de Beauvoir: A Feminist Thinker for Our Times,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 133–144.
Walzer, Michael, 2002. “Simone de Beauvoir and the Adapted Woman,” Filosoficky Casopis, 50(6): 943–961.
Walsh, Sylvia, 1998. “Feminine Devotion and Self-Abandonment: Simone de Beauvoir and Soren Kierkegaard on the Woman in Love,” Philosophy Today (Supplement), 42: 35–40.
Ward, Julie K., 1999. “Reciprocity and Friendship in Beauvoir’s Thought,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 14(4): 36–49.
Zakin, Emily, 2000. “Differences in Equality: Beauvoir’s Unsettling of the Universal,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination, 14(2): 104–120.
Zephyr, Jacques J., 1984. “Simone de Beauvoir et la femme,” Review of the University of Ottowa, 54: 37–53.

Albert Camus (1913–1960)

Allen, Jeffner and Iris Marion Young (eds.), 1989. The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modern French Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Bartlett, Elizabeth Ann, 1992. “Beyond Either/Or: Justice and Care in the Ethics of Albert Camus,” in Explorations in Feminist Ethics, Eve Browning (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kruks, Sonia, 1998. “Existentialism and Phenomenology,” in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Alison M. Jaggar (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.

Twentieth Century Philosophy: Social and Political Philosophy

Hannah Arendt (1906–1975)

Books

Bar On, Bat-Ami, 2002. The Subject of Violence: Arendtian Exercises in Understanding, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dietz, Mary G., 2003. Turning Operations: Feminism, Arendt and Politics, New York: Routledge.
Disch, Lisa J., 1994. Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Philosophy: With a New Preface, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Honig, Bonnie (ed.), 1995. Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Articles

Adams, Katherine, 2002. “At the Table with Arendt: Toward a Self-Interested Practice of Coalition Discourse,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 17(1): 1–33.
Allen, Amy, 1999. “Solidarity After Identity Politics: Hannah Arendt and the Power of Feminist Theory,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 25(1): 97–118.
Benhabib, Seyla, 1993. “Feminist Theory and Hannah Arendt’s Concept of Public Space,” History of the Human Sciences, 6(2): 97–114.
Birmingham, Peg, 2003. “Holes of Oblivion: The Banality of Radical Evil,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 18(1): 80–103.
Blattner, Sidonia and Irene M. Marti, 2005. “Rosa Luxemburg and Hannah Arendt: Against the Destruction of Political Spheres of Freedom,” Senem Saner (trans.), in Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 20(2): 88–101.
Cavarero, Adriana, 2003. “Review of Dietz and Bar On,” Political Theory: An International Journal of Political Philosophy, 31(6): 852–858.
Comesana-Santalices, Gloria M., 2001. “Lectura feminista de alguna textos de Hannah Arendt,” Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia, 18: 125–142.
Cutting Gray, Joanne, 1996. “Hannah Arendt, Feminism, and the Politics of Alterity: ‘What Will We Lose if We Win,’” in Hypatia’s Daughters: Fifteen Hundred Years of Women Philosophers, Linda Lopez McAlister (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Duhan, Laura, 1990. “Feminism and Peace Theory: Women as Nurturers versus Women as Public Citizens,” in In the Interest of Peace: A Spectrum of Philosophical Views, Wolfeboro: Longwood.
Franco, Vittoria, 1995. “Agnes Heller, una vita per l’autonomia e la liberta,” Iride, 8(16): 544–602.
Geddes, Jennifer L., 2003. “Banal Evil and Useless Knowledge: Hannah Arendt and Charlotte Delbo on Evil after the Holocaust,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 18(1): 104–115.
Guerra Palmero, Maria Jose, 1999. “Mujer, identidad y espacio publico,” Contrastes: Revista Interdisciplinar de Filosofia, 4: 45–64.
Klawiter, Maren, 1990. “Using Arendt and Heidegger to Consider Feminist Thinking on Women and Reproductive/Infertility Technologies,” Hypatia, 5(3): 65–89.
Lenz, Claudia, 2005. “The End or the Apotheosis of Labor? Hannah Arendt’s Contribution to the Question of the Good Life in Times of Global Superfluity of Human Labor Power,” Gertrude Postl (trans.), in Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 20(2): 135–154.
Long, Christopher Philip, 1998. “A Fissure in the Distinction: Hannah Arendt, the Family, and the Public/Private Dichotomy,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 24(5): 85–104.
McAfee, Noelle, 2004. “The Ends of Arendtian Politics: A Review of Hannah Arendt by Julia Kristeva; Speaking through the Mask: Hannah Arendt and the Politics of Social Identity by Norma Claire Moruzzi; and Our Sense of the Real: Aesthetic Experience and Arendtian Politics by Kimberly Curtis,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(4): 223–231.
Moynagh, Patricia, 1997. “A Politics of Enlarged Mentality: Hannah Arendt, Citizenship Responsibility, and Feminism,” Hypatia, 12(4): 27–53.
Winant, Terry, 1987. “The Feminist Standpoint: A Matter of Language,” Hypatia, 2: 123–148.
Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth, 1996. “Hannah Arendt Among Feminists,” in Hannah Arendt: Twenty Years Later, Larry May (ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Simone Weil (1909–1943)

Books

Weil, Simone, 1988–2012. Oeuvres complètes, André Devaux and Florence de Lussy (eds.), 7 vols., 1988–2012.
Allen, Diogenes and Eric O. Springsted, 1994, Spirit, Nature and Community: Issues in the Thought of Simone Weil, (Simone Weil Studies), Albany: State University of New York Press.
Avery, Desmond, 2008, Beyond Power: Simone Weil and the Notion of Authority, New York: Lexington Books.
Bell, Richard H. (ed), 1993, Simone Weil’s Philosophy of Culture: Readings toward a Divine Humanity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bell, Richard H., 1998, Simone Weil: The Way of Justice as Compassion, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Blum, Lawrence A. and Victor J. Seidler, 2010, A Truer Liberty: Simone Weil and Marxism, New York: Routledge Revivals.
Dargan, Joan, 1999, Simone Weil: Thinking Poetically, (Simone Weil Studies), Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dietz, Mary, 1988, Between the Human and the Divine: The Political Thought of Simone Weil, Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Doering, E. Jane, 2010, Simone Weil and the Specter of Self-Perpetuating Force, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Dunway, John M. and Eric O. Springsted (eds.), 1996, The Beauty that Saves: Essays on Aesthetics and Language in Simone Weil, Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.
Finch, Henry Leroy, 2001, Simone Weil and the Intellect of Grace, Martin Andic (ed.), New York: Continuum.
McLellan, David, 1990, Utopian Pessimist: The Life and Thought of Simone Weil, New York: Poseidon Press.
Morgan, Vance, 2005, Weaving the World: Simone Weil on Science, Mathematics, and Love, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Rozelle-Stone, A. Rebecca (ed.), 2017, Simone Weil and Continental Philosophy, London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Articles

Bourgault, Sophie, 2014. “Beyond the Saint and the Red Virgin: Simone Weil as Feminist Theorist of Care.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 35(2): 1–27.
Eaton, Jeffrey C., 1986. “Simone Weil and Feminist Spirituality,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 54(4): 691–704.
Kinsella, Helen M., 2021 “Of Colonialism and Corpses: Simone Weil on Force,” in Women’s International Thought: A New History, Patricia Owens and Katharina Rietzler (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–92.
Pinnock, S. K., (2010). “Mystical selfhood and women’s agency: Simone Weil and French feminist philosophy,” in The relevance of the radical: Simone Weil 100 years later, A. R. Rozelle-Stone & L. Stone (eds.), Continuum, 205–220.
Springsted, Eric O., 2010, “Mystery and Philosophy”, in The Relevance of the Radical: Simone Weil 100 Years Later, A. Rebecca Rozelle-Stone and Lucian Stone (eds), New York: Continuum, pp. 91–104.

John Rawls (1921–2002)

Agra, Maria Xose, 1994. “Justicia y Genero: Algunas cuestiones relevantes en torno a la teoria de la justicia de J. Rawls,” Anales de la Catedra Francisco Suarez, 31: 123–145.
Anderson, David, 1992. “False Stability in Rawlsian Liberalism,” Contemporary Philosophy, 14(5): 11–16.
Baehr, Amy R., 1996. “Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas,” Hypatia, 11(1): 49–66.
Brake, Elizabeth, 2004. “Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality?” in Journal of Moral Philosophy: An International Journal of Moral, Political and Legal Philosophy, 1(3): 293–309.
Cornell, Drucilla, 1995. “Response to Thomas McCarthy: The Political Alliance Between Ethical Feminism and Rawls’s Kantian Constructivism,” Constellations, 2(2): 189–206.
Graham, Kevin M., 2000. “The Political Significance of Social Identity: A Critique of Rawls’s Theory of Agency,” Social Theory and Practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy, 26(2): 201–222.
Green, Karen, 1986. “Rawls, Women, and the Priority of Liberty,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy (Supplement), 64: 26–36.
Green, Karen, 2006. “Parity and Procedural Justice,” Essays in Philosophy, 7(1): 1–18.
Laden, Anthony Simon, 2003. “Radical Liberals, Reasonable Feminists: Reason, Power and Objectivity in MacKinnon and Rawls,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(2): 133–152.
Meyers, Diana Tietjens, 1993. “Moral Reflections: Beyond Impartial Reason,” Hypatia, 8(3): 21–47.
Russell, J. S., 1995. “Okin’s Rawlsian Feminism? Justice in the Family and Another Liberalism,” Social Theory and Practice, 21(3): 397–426.
Sehon, Scott, 1996. “Okin on Feminism and Rawls,” Philosophical Forum, 27(4): 321–332.
Smith, Andrew F., 2004. “Closer but Still No Cigar: On the Inadequacy of Rawls’s Reply to Okin’s Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender,” Social Theory and Practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy, 30(1): 59–71.
Thompson, Janna, 1993. “What Do Women Want? Rewriting the Social Contract,” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 8(3): 257–272.

Michel Foucault (1926–1984)

Books

Foucault, Michel, 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel, 1979. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley, New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel, 1980. “Two Lectures”in Colin Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, Michel, 1983. “Afterword: The Subject and Power” in Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butler, Judith P., 1990, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London and New York: Routledge.
Diamond, Irene and Lee Quinby (eds.), 1988. Feminism and Foucault: Reflections of Resistance, Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Hekman, Susan (ed.), 1996. Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Heyes, Cressida, 2007. Self-Transformations: Foucault, Ethics, and Normalized Bodies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McNay, L., 1992. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and the Self, Cambridge: Polity Press.
McWhorter, Ladelle, 1999. Bodies and Pleasures: Foucault and the Politics of Sexual Normalization, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Rajchman, J., 1991. Truth and Eros: Foucault, Lacan, and the question of ethics, New York: Routledge.
Ramazanoglu, Caroline (ed.), 1993. Up Against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism, London: Routledge.
Rodríguez Magda, R.M., 1999. Foucault y la genealogía de los sexos, Barcelona: Anthropos.
Sawicki, Jana, 1991, Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power and the Body, New York: Routledge
Taylor, D. and K. Vintges (eds.), 2004. Feminism and the final Foucault, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Articles

Alcoff, Linda, 1990. “Feminist Politics and Foucault: The Limits to a Collaboration,” in Crises in Continental Philosophy, Arlene Dallery and Charles Scott (eds.), Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Amigot, Patricia and Margot Pujal, 2009. “On Power, Freedom, and Gender: A Fruitful Tension between Foucault and Feminism,” Theory and Psychology, 19(5): 646–669.
Butler, Judith, 2002. “What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue,” in The political: Blackwell readings in continental philosophy, D. Ingram (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 212–228.
Deveaux, Monique, 1994. “Feminism and Empowerment: A Critical Reading of Foucault,” Feminist Studies, 20(2): 223–247.
Fraser, Miriam, 1997. “Feminism, Foucault, and Deleuze,” Theory, Culture, and Society, 14(2): 23–37.
Hartsock, Nancy, 1990. “Foucault on power: A theory for women?” in Feminism/postmodernism, L. Nicholson (ed.), London: Routledge, 157–175.
King, Angela, 2004. “The Prisoner of Gender: Foucault and the Disciplining of the Female Body,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(2): 29–39.
Macleod, Catriona and Kevin Durrheim, 2002. “Foucauldian Feminism: The Implications of Governmentality,” Journal for The Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(1): 41–60.
McLaren, Margaret A., 1997. “Foucault and the Subject of Feminism.” Social Theory and Practice, 23(1): 109–128.
Moi, T., 1985. “Power, sex and subjectivity: Feminist reflections on Foucault,” Paragraph: Journal of the Modern Critical Theory Group, 8(5): 95–102.
Perrot, M., 1997. “De Mme. Jourdain à Herculine Barbin: Michel Foucault et l’histoire des femmes,” Au risque de Michel Foucault, D. Franche et al. (eds.), Paris: Editions du Centre Pompidou, 95–108.
Phelan, Shane, 1990. “Foucault and Feminism.” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 34 (2): 421–440.
Still, Judith, 1994. “What Foucault Fails to Acknowledge…: Feminism and ‘The History of Sexuality,’” History of Human Sciences, 7(2): 150–157.

Richard Rorty (1931–2007)

Books

Rothleder, Dianne, 1999. The Work of Friendship: Rorty, His Critics, and the Project of Solidarity, Albany: SUNY Press.

Articles

Amoros, Celia, 1997. “Richard Rorty and the ‘Tricoteuses,’” Constellations, 3(3): 364–376.
Amoros, Celia, 2002. “Movimentos feministas y resignificaciones linguisticas,” Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciencia, 30–31: 7–21.
Fraser, Nancy, 1988. “Solidarity or Singularity? Richard Rorty Between Romanticism and Technocracy,” Praxis International, 8: 257–272.
Fritzman, J. M., 1993. “Thinking With Fraser About Rorty, Feminism, and Pragmatism,” Praxis International, 13(2): 113–125.
Leland, Dorothy, 1988. “Rorty on the Moral Concern Philosophy: A Critique Froma Feminist Point of View,” Praxis International, 8: 273–283.
Renegard, Valerie R. and Stacey K. Sowards, 2003. “Liberal Irony, Rhetoric, and Feminist Thought: A Unifying Third Wave Feminist Theory,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 36(4): 330–352.
Rorty, Richard, 1991. “Feminism and Pragmatism,” Michigan Quarterly Review, 30(2): 231–58
Schultz, Bart, 1999. “Comment: The Private and Its Problems--Pragmatism, Pragmatic Feminism, and Homophobia,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29(2): 281–305
Skillen, Tony, 1992. “Reply to Richard Rorty’s ‘Feminism and Pragmatism’: Richard Rorty--Knight Errant,” Radical Philosophy, 62: 24–26.
Wilson, Catherine, 1992. “Reply to Richard Rorty’s ‘Feminism and Pragmatism’: How Did the Dinosaurs Die Out? How Did the Poets Survive?” Radical Philosophy, 62: 20–23.

Frankfurt School

Books

Alway, Joan, 1995. Critical Theory and Political Possibilities: Conceptions of Emancipatory Politics in the Works of Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, and Habermas, Westport: Greenwood Press.
Fraser, Nancy, 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Heberle, Renee (ed.), 2006. Feminist Interpretations of Theodor Adorno, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hutchings, Kimberly, 1996. Kant, Critique, and Politics, New York: Routledge.
Ingram, David, 1990. Critical Theory and Philosophy, New York: Paragon House.
Kelly, Michael (ed.), 1994. Critique and Power, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mills, Patricia Jagentoowicz, 1987. Woman, Nature, and Psyche, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stevernagel, Gertrude A., 1979. Political Philosophy as Therapy: Marcuse Reconsidered, Westport: Greenwood.

Articles

Allen, Amy, 2000. “Reconstruction or Deconstruction? A Reply to Johanna Meehan,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 26(3): 53–60.
Baehr, Amy R., 1996. “Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas,” Hypatia, 11(1): 49–66.
Couture, Tony, 1995. “Feminist Criticisms of Habermas’ Ethics and Politics,” Dialogue, 34(2): 259–279.
Crocker, Nancy, 1992. “The Problem of Community,” Southwest Philosophical Studies, 19: 50–62.
Eagan, Jennifer L., 2006. “Unfreedom, Suffering, and the Culture Industry: What Adorno Can Contribute to a Feminist Ethics,” in Feminist Interpretations of Theodor Adorno, Renee Heberle (ed.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 277–300.
Farganis, Sondra, 1977. “Liberty: Two Perspectives on the Women’s Movement,” Ethics, 88: 62–73.
Fleming, Marie, 1993. “Women and the ‘Public Use of Reason,’” Social Theory and Practice, 19(1): 27–50.
Guerra Palmero, Maria Jose, 1999. “Mujer, identidad y espacio publico,” Contrastes: Revista Interdisciplinar de Filosofia, 4: 45–64.
Herrera, Maria, 1992. “Equal Respect Among Unequal Partners: Gender Difference and the Constitution of Moral Subjects,” Philosophy East and West, 42(2): 263–275.
Johnson, Pauline, 2001. “Distorted Communications: Feminism’s Dispute with Habermas,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 27(1): 39–62.
Landes, Joan B., 1992. “Jurgen Habermas’s ‘The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere’: A Feminist Inquiry,” Praxis International, 12(1): 106–127.
Mahadevan, Kanchana, 2001. “Capabilities and Universality in Feminist Politics,” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 18(4): 75–105.
McNay, Lois, 2003. “Having it Both Ways: The Incompatibility of Narrative Identity and Communicative Ethics in Feminist Thought,” Theory, Culture and Society, 20(6): 1–20.
Meehan, Johanna, 2000. “Feminism and Habermas’ Discourse Ethics,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 26(3): 39–52.
Mullin, Amy, 2000. “Adorno, Art Theory, and Feminist Practice,” Philosophy Today, 44(1): 16–30.
Pamerleau, William C., 1996. “Can Habermas’ Discourse Ethics Accommodate the Feminist Perspective?” in Rending and Renewing the Social Order, Yeager Hudson (ed.), Lewiston: Mellen Press.
Phelan, Shane, 1990. “The Jargon of Authenticity: Adorno and Feminist Essentialism,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39–54.
Ryle, Martin, 1996. “Histories of Cultural Populism,” Radical Philosophy (78): 27–33.
Rumpf, Mechthild, 1993. “ ‘Mystical Aura’: Imagination and the Reality of Maternal in Horkheimer’s Writings,” in On Max Horkheimer, Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Cambridge: MIT Press.
Warnke, Georgia, 2000. “Feminism and Democratic Deliberation,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 26(3): 61–74.
Wilke, Sabine and Heidi Schlipphacke, 1997. “Construction of Gendered Subject: A Feminist Reading of Adorno’s ‘Aesthetic Reading,’” in The Semblance of Subjectivity, Tom Huhn (ed.), Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wright, Charles, 2004. “Particularity and Perspective Taking: On Feminism and Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Morality,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(4): 49–76.
Young, Iris Marion, 1986. “Impartiality and the Civic Public: Some Implications of Feminist Critiques of Moral and Political Theory,” Praxis International, 5: 381–401.

Twentieth Century Philosophy: Psychoanalysis

General Twentieth: Psychoanalysis

Flax, Jane, 1989. Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz, 1987. Woman, Nature, and Psyche, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nordquist, Joan, 2001. Social Theory: A Bibliographic Series, No. 64—Feminism and Psychoanalysis: A Bibliography, Santa Cruz: Reference & Research Services.
Whitbeck, Caroline, 1976. “Theories of Sex Difference,” in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)

Beardsworth, Sara, 2005. “Freud’s Oedipus and Kristeva’s Narcissus: Three Heterogeneities,” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 20(1): 54–77.
Fuchs, Jo Ann Pilardi, 1983. “On the War Path and Beyond: Hegel, Freud, and Feminist Theory,” Women Studies International Forum, 6: 565–572.
Keiser, R. Melvin, 1990. “Postcritical Religion and the Latent Freud,” Zygon, 433–447.
Kittay, Eva Feder, 1894. “Rereading Freud on ‘Femininity,’ or Why Not ‘Womb’ Envy,” Women Studies International Forum, 2: 385–391.
O’Neill, John (ed.), 1996. Freud and the Passions, University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
Malabou, Catherine, 2001. “History and the Process of Mourning in Hegel and Freud,” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy, 106 (March-April). 15–20.
Metcalf, Robert, 2000. “The Truth of Shame-Consciousness in Freud and Phenomenology,” Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 31(1): 1–18.
Nissim Sabat, Marilyn, 1985. “Freud, feminism, and faith,” Listening, 20: 208–220.
Pawlowski, Pawel Maciej, 1998. “On Some Philosophical Problems of Sigmund Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory,” Kwartalnik Filozoficzny, 26(2): 101–114. (Polish)

Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961)

Keller, Catherine, 1990. “Reconnecting: A Reply to Robert Moore,” in Archetypal Process: Self and Divine in Whitehead, Jung, and Hillman, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Valle, Valerie A. and Elizabeth L. Kruger, 1981. “The Nature and Expression of Feminine Consciousness,” in The Metaphors of Consciousness, Rolf von Eckartsberg (ed.), New York: Plenum Press.
Whitbeck, Caroline, 1976. “Theories of Sex Difference,” in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, Carol C. Gould and Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

Twentieth Century Philosophy: Other

Hekman, Susan (ed.), 1996. Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Holland, Nancy J. (ed.), 1997 Feminist Interpretations of Jacques Derrida, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania University State Press.

Acknowledgment

[Note: This bibliography was compiled by Abigail Gosselin and maintained by her until 2006. In 2015, it was revised and restructured by Rosalind Chaplin and Emily Hodges. In 2021, it was revised and restructured by Alin Varciu.]

Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative.
The Encyclopedia Now Needs Your Support
Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free

Supplement to Feminist History of Philosophy

Bibliography of Feminist Philosophers Writing about the History of Philosophy

General

Ancient Philosophy

General Ancient

Diotima of Mantinea (ca. 440 BCE)

Plato (429?–347 BCE)

Aesara of Lucania (ca. 400–300 BCE)

Aristotle (384–322 BCE)

Ban Zhao (5–116? CE)

Medieval Philosophy

General Medieval

Murasaki Shikibu (973?–1020?)

Hildegard of Bingen (1098–1179)

Heloise (1100-01?–1163-64?)

Akka Mahadevi (c. 1130–1160)

Herrad of Hohenburg/Landsberg (1130–1195)

Clare of Assisi (1194–1253)

Hadewijch (fl. 13th c.)

The Beguines

Mechthild of Magdeburg (1207?–1282/1294)

Margaret of Oingt (1240?–1310)

Angela of Foligno (1248–1309)

Marguerite Porete (1250–1310)

Gertrude of Helfta (1256–1302)

Julian of Norwich (1343–1416?)

Catherine of Siena (1347–1380)

Christine de Pizan (1364–1430?)

Other Medieval Philosophy

Renaissance and Sixteenth Century Philosophy

General Renaissance and Sixteenth

Isotta Nogarola (1418–1466)

Cassandra Fedele (1465–1558)

Laura Cereta (1469–1499)

Veronica Gambara (1485–1550)

Henricus Cornelius Agrippa (1486–1535)

Francis Bacon (1561–1626)

Oliva Sabuco de Nantes (1562–1626?)

Lucrezia Marinella (1571–1653)

Other Renaissance and Sixteenth Century Philosophy

Seventeenth Century Philosophy

General Seventeenth

Marie de Gournay (1565–1645)

Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679)

Angelique Arnauld (1591–1661)

Agnes Arnauld (1593–1671)

Rene Descartes (1596–1650) and Cartesianism

Bathsua Makin (1600–1675)

Anna Maria van Schurman (1607–1678)

Madeleine de Scudery (1607–1701)

Margaret Fell Fox (1614–1702)

Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia (1618–1680)

Margaret Cavendish (1623–1673)

Jane Lead[e] (1624–1704)

Jacqueline Pascal (1625–1661)

Queen Christina of Sweden (1626–1689)

Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, marquise de Sévigné (1626–1696)

Sophie of Hannover (1630–1714) and Sophie Charlotte (1668–1705)

Anne Conway (1631–1679)

Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677)

Gabrielle Suchon (1632–1703)

John Locke (1632–1704)

Françoise d’Aubigné, marquise de Maintenon (1635–1719)

Aphra Behn (1640–1689)

Marguerite Hessein, Madame de Sablière (1640–1693)

G.W. Leibniz (1646–1716)

Anne Le Fèvre Dacier (1647–1720)

François Poulain de la Barre (1647–1723)

Anne Therése, marquise de Lambert (1647–1733)

Sor Juana de la Cruz (1648–1695)

Jeanne-Marie Guyon (1648–1717)

Damaris Cudworth Masham, Lady Masham (1659–1708)

Mary Astell (1666–1731)

Other Seventeenth Century Philosophy

Eighteenth Century Philosophy

General Eighteenth

Bluestocking Women

Catharine Trotter Cockburn (1679–1749)

Giuseppa-EleonoraBarbapiccola (1702–1740)

Emilie du Châtelet (1706–1749)

Hadewijch (fl. 13^th c.)